Should universities and colleges mandate sexual behavior?: Student perceptions of antioch college’s consent policy

Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 35-51

  Humphreys, Terry ^a   Herold, Ed ^b  

^a WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Antioch college; Sexual assault; Sexual consent; Sexual ity policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846255049     PISSN: 08907064     EISSN: 15408698     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J056v15n01_04     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abbey, A. (1987). Misperceptions of friendly behavior as sexual interest: A survey of naturally occurring incidents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11,173-194.
2. Antioch College (1996). TheAntioch College sexual offense prevention policy. Yellow Springs, Ohio: Antioch College.
3. Benson, D., Charlton, C., & Goodhart, F.(1992). Acquaintance rape on campus: A literature review. Journal of American College Health, 40,157-165.
4. Carlson, B.E. (1996). Dating violence: Studentbeliefs about consequences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 3-18.
5. DeKeseredy, W.S., & Kelly, K.(1993). The incidence and prevalence of woman abuse in Canadian university and college dating relationships. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 18,137-159.
6. Ellis, G.M. (1994). Acquaintance rape. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 30,11-16.
7. Gagnon, J.H. (1990). The explicit and implicit use of the scripting perspective in sex research. In J. Bancroft (Ed.), Annual review ofsex research (pp. 1-44). Lake Mills, IA: The Society for the Scientific Study of Sex.
8. Greer, A.E., & Buss, D.M. (1994). Tactics for promoting sexual encounters. The Journal of Sex Research, 31,185-201.
9. Guskin, A.E. (1994). The Antioch response: Sex, you don't just talk about it. Yellow Springs, Ohio: Antioch College.
10. Haffner, D.W. (1995/96). The essence of “consent, is communication. SIECUS Report, 24, 2-4.
11. Hair, J.F., Jr., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (1987). Multivariate data analysis with readings (2nd ed.). New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.
12. Hall, D.S. (1995). Consent for sexual behavior in a college sample population. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Institute for Advanced Study of Human Sexuality, San Francisco, California.
13. Hickman, S.E., & Muehlenhard, C.L. (1999). “By the semi-mystical appearance of a condom, : How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. The Journal of Sex Research, 36, 258-272.
14. Johnson, I.M., & Sigler, R.T. (2000). Forced sexual intercourse among intimates. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 95-108.
15. Knodel, J.(1993). The design and analysis of focus group studies: A practical approach. In D.L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 35-50). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
16. Koss, M.P., Gidycz, C.A., & Wisniewski, N.(1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55,162-170.
17. Krueger, R.A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18. Margolin, L., Moran, P.B., & Miller, M.(1989). Social approval for violations of sexual consent in marriage and dating. Violence and Victims, 4, 45-55.
19. Mooney, C.Z. (1999). The politics of morality policy. The Policy Studies Journal, 27, 675-680.
20. Muehlenhard, C.L., Powch, I.G., Phelps, J.L., & Giusti, L.M. (1992). Definitions of rape: Scientific and political implications. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 23-44.
21. O’Sullivan, L.F., & Byers, E.S. (1992). College students’ incorporation of initiator and restrictor roles in sexual dating interactions. Journal of Sex Research, 29,435-446.
22. Petro, M. (2001). Current perceptions of the SOPP. The Antioch Record, p. 5.
23. Price, A. (1996). Sexual Offense Policy, Part II: Statistical analysis of student opinion. The Antioch Record, p. 5.
24. Sawyer, R., Desmond, S., & Lucke, G. (1993). Sexual communication and the college student: Implications for date rape. Health Values, 17,11-20.
25. Shotland, R.L., & Goodstein, L.(1992). Sexual precedence reduces the perceived legitimacy of sexual refusal: An examination of attributions concerning date rape and consensual sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 756-764.
26. Waldby, C., Kippax, S., & Crawford, J. (1993). Research note: Heterosexual men and ‘safe sex’ practice. Sociology of Health & Illness, 15, 246-256.
27. Weinberg, J., & Biernbaum, M. (1993). Conversations of consent: Sexual intimacy without sexual assault. In E. Buchwald, P. Fletcher, & M. Roth (Eds.), Transforming a rape culture. Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions.
28. Zeller, R.A. (1990). Qualitative approaches to the study of human sexuality. In A. Chouinard & J. Albert (Eds.), Human sexuality: Research perspectives in a world facing AIDS. Ottawa, ON: International Development Research Centre.