Readiness for change and drug use outcomes after treatment

Addiction

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 301-308

  Gossop, Michael ^a   Stewart, Duncan ^a   Marsden, John ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Heroin; Outcomes; Readiness for change; SOCRATES; Stages of change

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE DERIVATIVE; BENZODIAZEPINE DERIVATIVE; COCAINE; DIAMORPHINE; ILLICIT DRUG;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; DRUG MISUSE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ENGLAND; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; METHADONE; MIDDLE AGED; NARCOTICS; SUBSTANCE ABUSE DETECTION; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 33846247833     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01681.x     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. De Leon G. Integrative recovery: a stage paradigm. Subst Abuse 1996; 17: 51-63.
2. Sutton S. Can 'stages of change' provide guidance in the treatment of addictions? A critical examination of Prochaska and DiClemente's model. In: Edwards G., Dare C., editors. Psychotherapy, psychological treatments and the addictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996, p. 189-205.
3. Joe G. W., Simpson D. D., Broome K. M. Retention and patient engagement models for different treatment modalities in DATOS. Drug Alcohol Depend 1999; 57: 113-26.
4. Flynn P. M., Joe G. W., Broome K. M., Simpson D. D., Brown B. S. Looking back on cocaine dependence: reasons for recovery. Am J Addict 2003; 12: 398-411.
5. West R. Theory of Addiction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2006.
6. Prochaska J. O., DiClemente C. C. Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more integrative model of change. Psychother Theory Res Pract 1982; 19: 276-88.
7. DiClemente C. C., Prochaska J. O. Toward a comprehensive, transtheoretical model of change. In: Miller W. R., Heather N., editors. Treating addictive behaviors. New York: Plenum Press; 1998, p. 3-24.
8. Prochaska J. O., DiClemente C. C., Norcross J. C. In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol 1992; 47: 1102-14.
9. DiClemente C. C., Schlundt D., Gemmell L. Readiness and stages of change in addiction treatment. Am J Addict 2004; 13: 103-19.
10. DiClemente C. C., Story M., Murray K. On a roll: the process of initiation and cessation of problem gambling among adolescents. J Gambling Stud 2000; 16: 289-313.
11. Miller W. R., Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press, 1991.
12. Davidson R. Prochaska and DiClemente's model of change: a case study? Br J Addict 1992; 87: 821-2.
13. Davidson R. The Transtheoretical Model: a critical overview. In: Miller W., Heather N., editors. Treating addictive behaviors. New York: Plenum, 1998, p. 25-38.
14. West R. Time for a change. putting the transtheoretical (stages of change) model to rest. Addiction 2005; 100: 1036-9.
15. Etter J. F. Theoretical tools for the industrial era in smoking cessation counselling: a comment on West (2005). Addiction 2005; 100: 1041-2.
16. Callaghan R. C., Herzog T. A. The relation between processes-of-change and stage-transition in smoking behavior: a two-year longitudinal test of the Transtheoretical Model. Addict Behav 2005; 31: 1331-45.
17. Etter J. F., Sutton S. Assessing 'stage of change' in current and former smokers. Addiction 2002; 97: 1171-82.
18. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy. New York: Freeman; 1997.
19. Joseph J., Breslin C., Skinner H. Critical perspectives on the transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: Tucker J. A., Donovan D. M., Marlatt A., editors. Changing addictive behavior: bridging clinical and public health strategies. New York: Guilford Press; 1999, p. 161-90.
20. DiClemente C. C., Prochaska J. O., Fairhurst S. K., Velicer W. F., Velasquez M. M., Rossi J. S. The process of smoking cessation. an analysis of precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991; 59: 295-304.
21. Miller W. R., Westerberg V. S., Harris R. J., Tonigan J. S. What predicts relapse? Prospective testing of antecedent models. Addiction 1996; 91: S155-71.
22. Isenhart C. E. Pretreatment readiness for change in male alcohol dependent subjects: predictors of one-year follow-up status. J Stud Alcohol 1997; 58: 351-7.
23. Zhang A. Y., Harmon J. A., Werkner J., McCormick R. A. Impacts of motivation for change on the severity of alcohol use by patients with severe and persistent mental illness. J Stud Alcohol 2004; 65: 392-7.
24. Henderson M. J., Saules K. K., Galen L. W. The predictive validity of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Questionnaire in a heroin-addicted polysubstance abuse sample. Psychol Addict Behav 2004; 18: 106-12.
25. Maisto S. A., Conigliaro J., McNeil M., Kraemer K., O'Connor M., Kelley M. E. Factor structure of the socrates in a sample of primary care patients: a multisite outpatient and aftercare clinical sample of problem drinkers. Addict Behav 1999; 24: 879-92.
26. Farkas A. J., Pierce J. P., Zhu S.-H., Rosbrook B., Gilpin E. A., Berry C. et al. Addiction versus stages of change models in predicting smoking cessation. Addiction 1996; 91: 1271-80.
27. Siegel H. A., Li L., Rapp R. C., Saha P. Measuring readiness for change among crack cocaine users: a descriptive analysis. Subst Use Misuse 2001; 36: 687-700.
28. Campbell W. G. Evaluation of a residential program using the addiction severity index and stages of change. J Addict Dis 1997; 16: 27-39.
29. Carpenter K. M., Miele G. M., Hasin D. S. Does motivation to change mediate the effect of DSM-IV substance use disorders on treatment utilization and substance use? Addict Behav 2002; 27: 207-25.
30. Julian D. G. What is right and what is wrong about evidence-based medicine? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003; 14: S2-5.
31. Dickersin K., Rennie D. Registering clinical trials. JAMA 2003; 290: 516-23.
32. Jennions M. D., Moller A. P. Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the 'trim and fill' method. Biol Rev Camb Phil Soc 2002; 77: 211-22.
33. Cleophas R. C., Cleophas T. J. Is selective reporting of clinical research unethical as well as unscientific? Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 1999; 37: 1-7.
34. DiClemente C. C. A premature obituary for the transtheoretical model: a response to West (2005). Addiction 2005; 100: 1046-8.
35. Prochaska J. O., DiClemente C. C., Velicer W. F., Rossi J. S. Criticisms and concerns of the transtheoretical model in light of recent research. Br J Addict 1992; 87: 825-8.
36. Abellanas L., McLellan A. T. 'Stage of change' by drug problem in current opioid, cocaine and cigarette users. J Psychoact Drugs 1993; 25: 307-13.
37. Gossop M., Marsden J., Stewart D., Kidd T. The National Treatment Outcome Research Study (NTORS): 4-5-year follow-up results. Addiction 2003; 98: 291-303.
38. Miller W. R., Tonigan J. S. Assessing drinkers' motivation to change. the Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES). Psychol Addict Behav 1996; 10: 81-9.
39. Project Match Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol 1997; 58: 7-29.
40. Gossop M., Darke S., Griffiths P., Hando J., Powis B., Hall W. et al. The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS): psychometric properties of the SDS in English and Australian samples of heroin, cocaine and amphetamine users. Addiction 1995; 90: 607-14.
41. Gossop M., Marsden J., Stewart D., Lehmann P., Edwards C., Wilson A. et al. Substance use, health and social problems of clients at 54 drug treatment agencies: intake data from the National Treatment Outcome Research Study (NTORS). Br J Psychiatry 1998; 173: 166-71.
42. Gossop M., Marsden J., Stewart D. NTORS at One Year: the National Treatment Outcome Research Study: changes in substance use, health and criminal behaviors at one year after intake. London: Department of Health; 1998.
43. Derogatis L. R. The Brief Symptom Inventory: Administration, Scoring and Procedures. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems, Inc., 1993.
44. Strang J., Griffiths P., Abbey J., Gossop M. Survey of use of injected benzodiazepines among drug users in Britain. BMJ 1994; 308: 308-1082.
45. Stitzer M. L., Chutape M. A. Other substance use disorders in methadone treatment: prevalence, consequences, detection and management. In: Strain E. C., Stitzer M. L., editors. Methadone treatment for opioid dependence. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1999, p. 86-118.
46. De Wet C., Reed L., Glasper A., Moran P., Bearn J., Gossop M. Benzodiazepine co-dependence exacerbates the opiate withdrawal syndrome. Drug Alcohol Depend 2004; 76: 31-5.
47. Bandura A. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1977.
48. Hubbard R. L., Marsden M. E., Rachal J. V., Harwood H. J., Cavanaugh E. R., Ginzburg H. M. Drug Abuse Treatment: a National Study of Effectiveness. London: Chapel Hill; 1989.
49. Hubbard R. L., Craddock S. G., Flynn P. M., Anderson J., Etheridge R. M. Overview of 1 year follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav 1997; 11: 261-78.
50. McLellan T. A., Alterman A. I., Metzger D. S., Grissom G. R., Woody G. E., Luborsky L. et al. Similarity of predictors across opiate, cocaine, and alcohol treatments: role of treatment services. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994; 62: 1141-58.
51. Abrams D. B., Herzog T. A., Emmons K. M., Linnan L. Stages of change versus addiction: a replication and extension. Nicotine Tob Res 2000; 2: 223-9.
52. Willoughby F. W., Edens J. F. Construct validity and predictive utility of the stages of change for alcoholics. J Subst Abuse 1996; 8: 275-91.
53. Martin R. A., Rohsenow D. J., Mackinnon S. V., Abrams D. B., Monti P. M. Correlates of motivation to quit smoking among alcohol dependent patients in residential treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend 2005; 83: 73-8.
54. Kludt C. J., Perlmuter L. Effects of control and motivation on treatment outcome. J Psychoact Drugs 1999; 31: 405-14.
55. Dino G. A., Kamal K., Horn K., Kalsekar I., Fernandes A. Stage of change and smoking cessation outcomes among adolescents. Addict Behav 2004; 29: 935-40.
56. Shiffman S. 'Addiction versus stages of change models' versus 'addiction and stages of change models'. Addiction 1996; 91: 1289-90.
57. Simpson D. D., Joe G. W. Motivation as a predictor of early dropout from drug abuse treatment. Psychotherapy 1993; 30: 357-68.
58. Gossop M., Stewart D., Marsden J. Treatment process components and heroin use outcomes among methadone patients. Drug Alcohol Depend 2003; 71: 93-102.
59. Callaghan R. C., Hathaway A., Cunningham J. A., Vettese L. C., Wyatt S., Taylor L. Does stage-of-change predict dropout in a culturally diverse sample of adolescents admitted to inpatient substance-abuse treatment? A test of the Transtheoretical Model. Addict Behav 2005; 30: 1834-47.
60. Pisinger C., Vestbo J., Borch-Johnsen K., Thomsen T., Jorgensen T. Acceptance of the smoking cessation intervention in a large population-based study: the Inter99 study. Scand J Public Health 2005; 33: 138-45.
61. McLellan A. T., Grissom G. R., Zanis D., Randall M., Brill P., O'Brien C. Problem-service 'matching' in addiction treatment: a prospective study in 4 programs. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997; 54: 730-5.
62. De Leon G., Jainchill N. Circumstances, motivation, readiness and suitability as correlates of treatment tenure. J Psychoact Drugs 1986; 18: 203-8.
63. Fiorentine R., Nakashima J., Anglin M. D. Client engagement in drug treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat 1999; 17: 199-206.
64. Institute of Medicine. Broadening the Base of Treatment for Alcohol Problems. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.
65. Pisinger C., Vestbo J., Borch-Johnsen K., Jorgensen T. Is it possible to help smokers in earlymotivational stages to quit? The Inter99 study. Prev Med 2005; 40: 278-84.
66. Pisinger C., Vestbo J., Borch-Johnsen K., Jorgensen T. Smoking cessation intervention in a large randomised population-based study. The Inter99 study. Prev Med 2005; 40: 285-92.