Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) or French "classification ACR". What tool for what use? A point of view

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 187-191

  Dilhuydy, Marie Hélène ^a  

^a INSTITUT BERGONIÉ   (France)

Author keywords

BI RADS; French screening programme; Screening mammography

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; DIAGNOSIS; HEALTH RISKS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT MONITORING; RADIOLOGY;

BI-RADS; FRENCH SCREENING PROGRAM; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FRANCE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL SOCIETY; ORGANIZATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST;

BREAST DISEASES; FRANCE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 33846246811     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.08.032     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). 4th ed. (2004), American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
2. BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System). Atlas d'imagerie du sein-Mammographie. Deuxième édition française basée sur la 4ème édition américaine. Société Française de Radiologie, Paris, 2004.
3. Berg W.A., Campassi C., Langenberg P., and Sexton M.J. Breast imaging reporting and data system: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR 174 (2000) 1769-1777
4. Geller B.M., Barlow W.E., Ballard-Barbash R., et al. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS to report on the mammographic evaluation of women with signs and symptoms of breast disease. Radiology 222 (2002) 536-542
5. Liberman L., Abramson A.F., Squires F.B., Glassman J.R., Morris E.A., and Dershaw D.D. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR 171 (1998) 34-40
6. Taplin S.H., Ichikawa L.E., Kerlikowske K., et al. Concordance of breast imaging reporting and data system assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography. Radiology 222 (2002) 529-535
7. Obenauer S., Hermann K.P., and Grabbe E. Applications and literature review of the BI-RADS classification. Eur Radiol 15 (2005) 1027-1036
8. Berg W.A., D'Orsi C.J., Jackson V.P., et al. Does training in the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography?. Radiology 224 (2002) 871-880
9. Lehman C., Holt S., Peacock S., White E., and Urban N. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists: concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms. AJR 179 (2002) 15-20
10. Sickles E.A., Wolverton D.E., and Dee K.E. Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists. Radiology 224 (2002) 861-869
11. Varas X., Leborgne J.H., Leborgne Fr, Mezzera J., Jaumandreu S., and Leborgne Fe. Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions. AJR 179 (2002) 691-695
12. Europe Against Cancer. European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening, 4th ed. European Commission, 2003.
13. Welch H.G., and Black W.C. Using autopsy series to estimate the disease "reservoir" for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: how much more breast cancer can we find?. Ann Int Med 127 (1997) 1023-1028
14. Zahl P.H., Stand B.H., and Maehlen J. Incidence of breast cancer in Norway and Sweden during introduction of nationwide screening: prospective cohort study. Br Med J 328 (2004) 921-924
15. Schwartz L.M., Woloshin S., Sox H.C., Fischhoff B., and Welch H.G. US Women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional survey. Br Med J 320 (2000) 1635-1640
16. Smith-Bindman R., Chu P.W., Miglioretti D.L., et al. Comparison on screening mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom. JAMA 290 (2003) 2129-2137
17. Olsen A.H., Njor S.H., Vejborg I., et al. Breast cancer mortality in Copenhagen after introduction of mammography screening: cohort study. Br Med J 330 (2005) 220-222