New angles and tangles in the ethics review of research

Journal of Academic Ethics

Volumn 4, Issue 1-4, 2006, Pages 261-274

  Van Den Hoonaard, Will C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Changes in ethics regimes; Ethics fads; Ethics in research

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846244640     PISSN: 15701727     EISSN: 15728544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10805-006-9022-4     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Adler, P. A. and Adler, P. (2002). Do university lawyers and the police define research values? In W. C. van den Hoonaard (Ed.), Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers, Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, pp. 34-42.
2. Anthony, R. (2004). Consistency of ethics review, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 6 (1) (October), Art. 5. Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/ 1-05/05-1-5-e.htm.
3. Center for Advanced Study Project Steering Committee (2005). Improving the System for Protecting Human Subjects: Counteracting IRB 'Mission Creep,' Chicago. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
4. Dolan, B. (1999). The impact of local research ethics committees on the development of nursing knowledge, Journal of Advanced Nursing 30(5), 1009-1010.
5. Erikson, K. (1976). Everything in its Path: Destruction of Community in the Buffalo Creek. New York: Simon and Schuster.
6. ESRC (Science and Technology Studies Unit) (2004). Discussion Paper 4 - Implementing the ESRC Research Ethics Framework: The Case for Research Ethics Committees, York and Oxford; Department of Sociology, University of York, and School of Social Studies and Law, Oxford Brookes University.
7. Fitzgerald, M. H. (2004). Big basket or mission creep? Professional Ethics Report XVII(2), 1-3.
8. Haggerty, K. (2003). Ethical Drift: Governing Social Science Research in the Name of Ethics, Presented to the American Law and Society Meetings, Pittsburgh, 5-8 June.
9. Johnson, J. M., and Altheide, D. L. (2002). Reflections on Professional Ethics, In W. C. van den Hoonaard (Ed.), Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers, Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, pp. 59-69.
10. Kellner, F. (2002). Yet another current crisis: the ethics of conduct and representation in fieldwork-dependent social science. In Will C. van den Hoonaard (Ed.), Walking the Tightrope Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, pp. 48-62.
11. MRC et al. (Medical Research Council, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council) (1998). Tri-Council Policy Statement on Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Ottawa. ON: Public Works and Government Services Canada.
12. National Centre for Research Methods (2006). Commissioned Inquiry: Risk to Well-Being of Researchers in Qualitative Research, Cardiff, Wales: University of Cardiff. Accessed 4 April 2006 at http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/socsi/ qualiti/commissioned_inq_2.html.
13. NHMRC et al. (National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council, and Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee) (2006). Draft of the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research: Second Consultation, Canberra: NHMRC. Jan.
14. Rogers, W. T. (2001). The Potential Adverse Affect of the Tri-Council Ethical Guidelines on Educational Research, Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education. May.
15. SSHWC (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Special Working Committee) (2004). Giving Voice to the Spectrum, Ottawa: Secretariat on Research Ethics, 80 pp. (Unpubl.).
16. SSHWC (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Special Working Committee) (2006). Reconsidering Privacy and Confidentiality in the TCPS. Ottawa: Secretariat on Research Ethics. Febr.
17. SSHWC (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Special Working Committee) (2007). 'Qualitative Research' in the Context of the TCPS: A Discussion Paper Ottawa: Secretariat on Research Ethics, forthcoming.
18. SRA (Society for Research Administrators International) (2006). Announcement of Annual Meeting in Quebec City, 14-18 Oct. 2006, E-mail from Gilles B. Morier of University of Ottawa, 1 August 2006.
19. Üstün B. and Jakob R. (2005). Calling a spade a spade: meaningful definitions of health conditions. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 83, 802.
20. van den Hoonaard, W. C., (Ed.) (2002). Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
21. van den Hoonaard, W. C. (2006a). Trends in Canadian Sociology Master's Theses in Light of Research Ethics Review, 1995-2004, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (under review).
22. van den Hoonaard, W. C. (2006b). Re-Imagining the 'Subject': Conceptual and Ethical Considerations on the Participant in Qualitative Research, Meeting on Guidelines for Ethics Review of Qualitative Health Research,WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, Guaruja (Brazil), 30 Aug.
23. van den Hoonaard, W. C., and Connolly, A. (2006). Anthropological research in light of research-ethics review: Canadian master's theses, 1995-2004, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 1(2), 59-70.
24. Ward, H. J. T. et al. (2004). Obstacles to Conducting Epidemiological Research in the UK General Population, British Medical Journal 329, 277-279, (July).