Testing the applicability of the SASS5 scoring procedure for assessing wetland health: A case study in the KwaZulu-Natal midlands, South Africa

African Journal of Aquatic Science

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 229-246

  Bowd, Rebecca ^a   Kotze, Donovan C ^a   Morris, Craig D ^a   Quinn, Nevil W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bioassessment; Environmental impacts; Macroinvertebrates; Microhabitats; Palustrine wetlands; Sampling methods; SASS5; Water quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846241790     PISSN: 16085914     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2989/16085910609503893     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. ADAMUS PR and BRANDT K (1990) Impacts on quality of inland wetlands of the United States: a survey of indicators, techniques and applications of community-level biomonitoring data. Report No. EPA/600/3-90/073, US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington DC, USA
2. nd edn). EPA 841-B-99-002. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. Washington DC, USA
3. BATTLE J, GOLLADAY SW and CLAYTON B (2001) Aquatic macroinvertebrates and water quality characteristics in five wetland types: preliminary results on biomonitoring. In: Hatcher KJ (ed) Proceedings of the 2001 Georgia Water Resources Conference, March 26-27, 2001, University of Georgia. Institute of Ecology. University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA, pp 333-336
4. BATZER BDJ, RADER RR and WISSINGER SA (1999) Invertebrates in Freshwater Wetlands of North America: Ecology and Management. John Wiley, New York, USA, pp 1-22
5. BOWD R (2005) Towards a Macroinvertebrate Sampling Protocol for Monitoring Water Quality of Wetlands in South Africa. Unpublished MEnvDev thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, 211 pp
6. BOWD R, KOTZE DC, MORRIS CD and QUINN NW (2006) Developing a macroinvertebrate sampling technique for palustrine wetlands in South Africa: a pilot investigation in the KwaZulu-Natal midlands. African Journal of Aquatic Science
7. BUTCHER R (2003) Options for the assessment and monitoring of wetland condition in Victoria. The State of Victoria, State Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Committee, Australia
8. CHESSMAN BC, TRAYLER KM and DAVIS JA (2002) Family- and species-level biotic indices for macroinvertebrates of wetlands on the Swan coastal plain, Western Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 53: 919-930
9. CHUTTER FM (1994) The rapid biological assessment of stream and river water quality by means of the macroinvertebrate community in South Africa. In: Uys MC (ed) Classification of Rivers and Environmental Health Indicators. Proceedings of a Joint SA/Australian workshop. Report No. TT 63/94, Water Research Commission, Cape Town, South Africa, pp 217-234
10. CHUTTER FM (1998) Research on the rapid biological assessment of water quality impacts in streams and rivers. Report No. 422/1/98, Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa
11. DALLAS HF (2002) Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in lotic systems: implications for defining reference conditions for macroinvertebrates. Report No. KV 138/02, Water Research Commission, Cape Town, South Africa
12. DAVIS JA, ROSISCH JS, BRADLEY JS, GROWNS JE, SCHMIDT LG and CHEAL F (1993) Wetlands of the Swan Coastal Plain, Vol. 6: Wetland Classification on the Basis of Water Quality and Invertebrate Community Data. Water Corporation of Western Australia and Western Australia Department of Environmental Protection, Perth, Australia
13. DEKEYSER ES, KIRBY DR and ELL MJ (2003) An index of plant community integrity: development of the methodology for assessing prairie wetland plant communities. Ecological Indicators 3(2): 119-133
14. DE LA REY PA, TAYLOR JC, LAAS A, VAN RENSBURG L and VOSLOO A (2004) Determining the possible application value of diatoms as indicators of general water quality: a comparison with SASS5. Water SA 30: 325-332
15. th International Symposium on Trichoptera, 1998, Chiang Mai 1999. pp 237-244
16. DE MOOR FC (2002) Shortcoming and advantages of using rapid biological assessment techniques for the purpose of characterizing rivers in South Africa. Verhandlungen Internationale Vereinigungen für Theoretische und Angerwandte Limnologie 28: 651-662
17. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND TOURISM (DEAT) (1997) White paper on the conservation and sustainable use of South Africa's biological diversity. Government Gazette Vol. 385, No. 18163. Notice No. 1095 of 1997. Department of Environment Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria, South Africa
18. DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY (DWAF) (1996) South African Water Quality Guidelines, Vol. 7: Aquatic Ecosystems. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria, South Africa
19. DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY (DWAF) (2004) Development of a framework for the assessment of wetland ecological integrity in South Africa. Phase 1: situation analysis. By Uys MC, contributors Marneweck G and Maseti P. Resource Quality Services, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria, South Africa
20. DETENBECK NE (2002) Methods for evaluating wetland condition: wetlands classification. No. 7. EPA-822-R-02-017. Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington DC, USA
21. DICKENS CWS and GRAHAM PM (2002) The South African Scoring System (SASS) Version 5 rapid bioassessment method for rivers. African Journal of Aquatic Science 27:1-10
22. DIFRANCO J and STEVENSON J (2000) Maine Department of Environmental Protection. US Environmental Protection Agency. Available at http://www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/bawwg/case/me.html [accessed 17 September 2003]
23. FENNESSY S, GERNES M, MACK JJ and WARDROP DH (2002) Methods for evaluating wetland condition: using vegetation to assess environmental conditions in wetlands. EPA-822-R-02-020. Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, USA, 22pp
24. GERBER A and GABRIEL MJM (2002a) Aquatic invertebrates of South African rivers illustration. Institute for Water Quality Studies, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria, South Africa
25. GERBER A and GABRIEL MJM (2002b) Aquatic invertebrates of South African rivers: field guide. Institute for Water Quality Studies, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria, South Africa
26. GERNES MC and HELGEN JC (1999) Indexes of biotic integrity (IBI) for wetlands: vegetation and invertebrate IBI's. Final Report to US EPA. Federal Assistance #CD995525-01. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, USA
27. GERNES MC and HELGEN JC (2000) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Wetland Bioassessment Program. US Environmental Protection Agency. Available at http://www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/bawwg/case/mn1.html [accessed 17 September2003]
28. GERNES MC and HELGEN JC (2002) Indexes of biological integrity (IBI) for large depressional wetlands in Minnesota. Final Report to US EPA. Federal Assistance #CD995525-01, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, USA
29. GRAHAM MP, DICKENS CWS and TAYLOR RJ (2004) miniSASS - A novel technique for community participation in river health monitoring and management. African Journal of Aquatic Science 29(1): 25-35
30. HELGEN J (2002) Methods for evaluating wetland condition: developing an invertebrate index of biological integrity for wetlands. No. 9. EPA-822-R-02-019. Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington DC, USA
31. HICKS AL (2000) New England Freshwater Wetlands Invertebrate Biomonitoring Protocol (NEFWIBP). A Manual for Volunteers. University of Massachusetts Extension, Massachusetts, USA
32. KARR JR and CHU EW (1999) Restoring Life in Running Waters: Better Biological Monitoring. Island Press, Washington DC, USA
33. KOTZE DC, BREEN CM and QUINN N (1995) Wetland losses in South Africa. In: Cowan GI (ed) Wetlands of South Africa. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria, South Africa. pp 263-272
34. MALTBY E (1991) Wetland management goals: wise use and conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning 20: 9-18
35. MCMILLAN PH (2002) Invertebrate habitat assessment system IHAS-fantasy stream page. Available at http://www.csir.co.za/ihas/index. html [accessed 19 March 2005]
36. rd edn). John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, USA
37. OLSON EJ, ENGSTROM E, DOERINGSFELD M and BELLIG B (1995) Abundance and distribution of macroinvertebrates in relation to macrophyte communities in the Prairies marsh, Swan Lake, Minnisota. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 10(4): 325-335
38. PARKER AK (2002) Methods for evaluating wetland condition: study design for monitoring wetlands. No. 4. EPA-822-R-02-015. Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington DC, USA
39. PICKER M, GRIFFITHS C and WEAVING A (2003) Field Guide to Insects of South Africa. Struik Publishers, Cape Town, South Africa
40. SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL WATER ACT (1998) Act No. 36 of 1998. Government Gazette Vol. 398. No. 19182, 26 August 1998, Cape Town, South Africa
41. TEELS M and ADAMUS P (2002) Methods for evaluating wetland condition: developing metrics and indexes of biological integrity. No. 6. EPA-822-R-02-016. Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, USA
42. TER BRAAK CJF and ŠMILAUER P (2003) Canoco Reference Manual for Windows, Version 4.5. biometris - Plant Research International, Wageningen, The Netherlands
43. US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS) (1980) Habitat Evaluation Procedure (HEP) manual (102 ESM). US Fish and Wildlife Services, Washington DC, USA
44. VAN DER VALK A (2002) Methods for evaluating wetland condition: wetland bioassessment case studies. No. 14. EPA-822-R-02-013. Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, USA
45. VAN STADEN S (2003) A Case Study on the Use of Habitat Assessments and Biological Indices for the Management of Recreational Stream Fisheries. MSc thesis, Rand Afrikaans University, South Africa. Available at http://etd.rau.ac.za/theses/available/etd-02122004-100736/restricted/ Mscthesisbodydocument.pdf [accessed 20 March 2005]
46. VOS P, WEPENER V and CYRUS DP (2002) Efficiency of the SASS4 rapid bioassessment protocol in determining river health: a case study on the Mhlathuze River, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Water SA 28(1): 13-22
47. WHYTE AV (ed) (1995) Building a New South Africa, Vol. 4: Environment, Reconstruction and Development. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada