Perception and recognition memory of words and werds: Two-way mirror effects

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1495-1511

  Becker, D Vaughn ^a   Goldinger, Stephen D ^a   Stone, Gregory O ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; DECISION MAKING; FALSE MEMORY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; LANGUAGE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHONETICS; RELIABILITY; SEMANTICS; VERBAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 33846240921     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195914     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. ATKINSON, R. C., & JUOLA, J. F. (1973). Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 583-612). New York: Academic Press.
2. BALOTA, D. A., & CHUMBLEY, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 340-357.
3. BECKER, C. A., & KILLION, T. H. (1977). Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 389-401.
4. COLTHEART, M., RASTLE, K., PERRY, C., LANGDON, R., & ZIEGLER, J. (2001). DRC: A dual-route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
5. DONALDSON, W. (1992). Measuring recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 275-277.
6. FORSTER, K. I., & FORSTER, J. C. (1996). DMASTR (version 2.16) [computer program]. Available at www.u.arizona.edu/~kforster/ dmastr /dmastr.htm.
7. GLANZER, M., ADAMS, J. K., IVERSON, G. J., & KIM, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 100, 546-567.
8. GLANZER, M., & EHRENREICH, S. L. (1979). Structure and search of the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 381-398.
9. GOLDINGER, S. D., KLEIDER, H. M., & SHELLEY, E. (1999). The marriage of perception and memory: Creating two-way illusions with words and voices. Memory & Cognition, 27, 328-338.
10. GORDON, B. (1983). Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 24-44.
11. GOTTLOB, L., GOLDINGER, S. D., STONE, G. O., & VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1999). Reading homographs: Orthographic, phonologic, and semantic dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 561-574.
12. GRAINGER, I., & JACOBS, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple readout model. Psychological Review, 183, 518-565.
13. GREEN, D. M., & SWETS, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
14. GROSSBERG, S. (1980). How does a brain build a cognitive code? Psychological Review, 87, 1-51.
15. GROSSBERG, S., & STONE, G. O. (1986). Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: Attentional priming, learning, and resonance. Psychological Review, 93, 46-74.
16. HARM, M. W., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491-528.
17. HINTZMAN, D. L. (1986). "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
18. HINTZMAN, D. L., & CURRAN, T. (1997). Comparing retrieval dynamics in recognition memory and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 228-247.
19. HOLMES, V. M., & NG, E. C. (1993). Word-specific knowledge, word-recognition strategies, and spelling ability. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 230-257.
20. JACOBY, L. L. (1999). Ironic effects of repetition: Measuring age-related differences in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 3-22.
21. JACOBY, L. L., & DALLAS, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.
22. JACOBY, L. L., & WHITEHOUSE, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126-135.
23. JARED, D., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1991). Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 358-394.
24. KUČERA, H., & FRANCIS, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
25. LEWELLEN, M. J., GOLDINGER, S. D., PISONI, D. B., & GREENE, B. (1993). Lexical familiarity and processing efficiency: Individual differences in naming, lexical decision, and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 316-330.
26. LOGAN, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
27. LUKATELA, G., EATON, T., LEE, C. H., CARELLO, C., & TURVEY, M. T. (2002). Equal homophonic priming with words and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 3-21.
28. LUKATELA, G., FROST, S. J., & TURVEY, M. T. (1999). Identity priming in English is compromised by phonological ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 775-790.
29. LUKATELA, G., & TURVEY, M. T. (1994a). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107-128.
30. LUKATELA, G., & TURVEY, M. T. (1994b). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 331-353.
31. MACMILLAN, N. A., & CREELMAN, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330.
33. NEELY, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. PAAP, K. R., NEWSOME, S. L., MCDONALD, J. E., & SCHVANEVELDT, R. W. (1982). An activation- verification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
35. PERFETTI, C. A., & BELL, L. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 msec of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and masked priming. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 473-485.
36. PERFETTI, C. A., & ZHANG, S. (1995). Very early phonological activation in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 24-33.
37. PLAUT, D. C., MCCLELLAND, J. L., SEIDENBERG, M. S., & PATTERSON, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
38. RATCLIFF, R. (1988). Continuous versus discrete information processing: Modeling accumulation of partial information. Psychological Review, 95, 238-255.
39. RHODES, G., PARKIN, A. J., & TREMEWAN, T. (1993). Semantic priming and sensitivity in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 154-165.
40. ROEDIGER, H. L., III (1996). Memory illusions. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 76-100.
41. RUECKL, I. G. (2002). The dynamics of visual word recognition. Ecological Psychology, 14, 5-19.
42. SCHVANEVELDT, R. W., & MCDONALD, J. E. (1981). Semantic context and the encoding of words: Evidence for two modes of stimulus analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 673-687.
43. SEIDENBERG, M. S., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
44. SEIDENBERG, M. S., & ZEVIN, J. D. (2003, November). Sensitivity to sublexical statistics and subject variability in the triangle model of reading. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
45. SHIFFRIN, R. M., & STEYVERS, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 145-166.
46. STONE, G. O., VANHOY, M., & VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 36, 337-359.
47. STONE, G. O., & VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1993). Strategic control of processing in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 744-774.
48. UNDERWOOD, B. J. (1969). Attributes of memory. Psychological Review, 76, 559-573.
49. VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181-198.
50. VAN ORDEN, G. C., & GOLDINGER, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains the perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
51. VAN ORDEN, G. C., STONE, G. O., GARLINGTON, K. L., MARKSON, L. R., PINNT, G. S., SIMONFY, C. M., & BRICHETTO, T. (1992). "Assembled" phonology and reading: A case study in how theoretical perspective shapes empirical investigation. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 249-292). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
52. WAGENMAKERS, E.-J., STEYVERS, M., RAAIJMAKERS, J. G. W., SHIFFRIN, R. M., VAN RIJN, H., & ZEELENBERG, R. (2004). A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 332-367.
53. WAGENMAKERS, E.-J., ZEELENBERG, R., STEYVERS, M., SHIFFRIN, R. M., & RAAIJMAKERS, J. G. W. (2004). Nonword repetition in lexical decision: Support for two opposing processes. Quarterly Journal of Experiment Psychology, 57A, 1191-1210.
54. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & CANTWELL, A. L. (1987). Enduring influence of the purpose of experiences: Encoding-retrieval interactions in word and pseudoword perception. Memory & Cognition, 15, 465-472.
55. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & LEBOE, J. (2000). The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: Fluency, generation and resemblance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 84-106.
56. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & WILLIAMS, L. D. (2001). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 3-13.
57. ZIEGLER, J. C., JACOBS, A. M., & KLÜPPEL, D. (2001). Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: Still a challenge for current word recognition models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 547-559.
58. ZIEGLER, J. C., STONE, G. O., & JACOBS, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 600-618.