Does persistence of social exclusion exist in Spain?

Journal of Economic Inequality

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 53-72

  Poggi, Ambra ^a  

^a Centre for Employment Studies   (Italy)

Author keywords

Discrete panel data model; Dynamics; Heterogeneity; Persistence; Social exclusion

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846228773     PISSN: 15691721     EISSN: 15738701     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10888-006-9025-9     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adiego, M., Moneo, C.: Poverty and persistent poverty in Spain, 1994-2001. In: Social Indicators of Spain 2004, Instituto Nacional de Estadistica, Madrid (2004).
2. Ahn, S.C., Schmidt, P.: Efficient estimation of models for dynamic panel data. J. Econom. 68, 5-28 (1995).
3. Anderson, T.W., Hsiao, C.: Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. J. Econom. 68, 5-27 (1982).
4. Arellano, M., Bond, S.R.: Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econ. Stud. 58, 277-297 (1991).
5. Arellano, M., Bover, O.: Another look at the instrumental variables estimation of error-component models. J. Econom. 68, 29-51 (1995).
6. Arriba, A., Moreno, L.: Spain: Poverty, social exclusion and safety nets, Documento de trabajo 02-10, Unidad de Politicas Comparadas (CISC) (2002).
7. Arulampalam, W., Booth A.L., Taylor, M.P.: Unemployment persistence. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 52, 24-50 (2000).
8. Atkinson, A.B.: On the poverty measurement. Econometrica 55, 749-64 (1999).
9. Bane, M.J., Ellwood, D.T.: Slipping into and out of poverty: The dynamics of spells. J. Hum. Resour. 12 (1), 1-23 (1986).
10. Biewen, M.: Measuring state dependence in individual poverty status: Are there feedback effects to employment decisions and household composition?, Discussion paper No. 1138, IZA, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn (2004).
11. Blundell, R., Bond, S.: Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econom. 87, 115-143 (1998).
12. Brandolini, A., D'Alessio, G.: Measuring well-being in the functioning space (mimeo), Bank of Italy, Rome (1998).
13. Burchardt, T.: Social exclusion: Concept and evidence. In: Gordon, D., Townsend, P. (eds.) Breadline Europe: The Measurement of Poverty, pp. 385-406. Policy, Bristol (2000).
14. Burchardt, T., LeGrande, J., Piachaud, D.: Degrees of exclusion: Developing a dynamic multidimensional measure. In: Hills, J., Le Grand, J., Pichaud, D. (eds.) Understanding Social Exclusion, Ch. 3, Oxford University Press (2002).
15. Burgess, S., Propper, C.: An economic model of household income dynamics, with an application to poverty dynamics among American woman. CASE Papers 09, Centre for the Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics, London (1998).
16. Cappellari, L., Jenkins, S.: Modelling low income transitions. J. Appl. Econ. 19 (5), 593-610 (2004).
17. Cappellari, L., Jenkins, S.P.: Who stays poor? Who becomes poor? Evidence from the British household panel survey. Econ. J. 112 (478), C60-C67 (2002).
18. D'Ambrosio, C., Chakravarty, S.R.: The measurement of social exclusion. Discussion Paper 364, German Institute for Economic Research (DIW-Berlin) (2003).
19. Devicienti, F.: Poverty persistence in Britain: A multivariate analysis using the BHPS, 1991-1997. J. Econ. 9, 1-34 (2001).
20. European Commission: European competitiveness report 2001, Luxembourg (2001).
21. Gardiner, K., Hills, J.: Policy implications of new data on income mobility. Econ. J. 109, F91-F111 (1999).
22. Hahn, J.: How informative is the initial condition in the dynamic panel data model with fixed effects? J. Econom. 93, 309-326 (1999).
23. Heckman, J.: Statistical models for discrete panel data. In: Manski, C., McFadden, D. (eds.) Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, pp. 114-178. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1981).
24. Heckman, J.J.: Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system. Econometrica 46 (4), 921-959 (1978).
25. Honore, B.E.: Orthogonality conditions for Tobit models with fixed effects and lagged dependent variables. J. Econom. 59 (1-2), 35-61 (1993).
26. Honore, B.E.: Non-linear models with panel data. Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, working paper CWP 13/02, the Institute for Fiscal Studies, London (2002).
27. Honore, B.E., Arellano, M.: Panel data models: Some recent developments. In: Heckman, J.J., Learmer, E. (eds.) Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 5, pp. 3229-3296, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (2001).
28. Honore, B.E., Kyriazidou, E.: Panel data discrete choice models with lagged dependent variables. Econometrica 68, 839-874 (2000).
29. Hsiao, C.: Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986).
30. Jenkins, S.P.: Modelling household income dynamics. J. Popul. Econ. 13, 529-567 (2000).
31. Lee, P., Murie, A.: Literature Review of Social Exclusion. Scottish Office Central Research Unit, Stationery Office, Edinburgh (1999).
32. Nolan, B., Whelan, C.T., Maitre, Layte: Poverty dynamics: An analysis of the 1994-95 waves of the European community household panel. Working Paper 10, ISER, EPAG, University of Essex (2000).
33. Nolan, B., Whelan, C.T., Maitre, Layte: Explaining deprivation in european union. Acta Sociol. 44 (2), 105-122 (2001a).
34. Nolan, B., Whelan, C.T., Maitre, Layte: Income deprivation and economic strain: An analysis of the European Community Household Panel. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 17 (4), 357-372 (2001b).
35. Nolan, B., Whelan, C.T., Maitre, Layte: Persistent income poverty and deprivation in the European Union. Working Paper 17, ISER, EPAG, University of Essex (2001c).
36. OECD: Economic survey of Spain, 2005. Policy Brief, OECD Observer (2005).
37. Sen, A.: Social Exclusion: Concept, application and scrutiny. Social Development Papers, No.1, Asian Development Bank (2000).
38. Stevens, A.H.: Climbing out of poverty, falling back in. J. Hum. Resour. 34 (31) 557-588 (1999).
39. Stewart, M.B., Swaffield, J.K.: Low pay dynamics and transition probabilities. Economica 66 (261), 23-42 (1999).
40. Trivellato, E., Giraldo, A., Rettore, E.: The persistence of poverty: True state dependence or unobserved heterogeneity? Some evidence from the Italian survey on household income and wealth, paper prepared for the 27th General Conference of the IARIW (2002).
41. Tsakloglou, P., Papadopoulos, F.: Poverty, material deprivation and multi-dimensional disadvantage during four life stages: Evidence from ECHP. In: Heady, C. (ed.) Poverty and social exclusion in Europe. E. Elgar, Cheltenham; Northampton, MA (2002)
42. Wooldridge, J.M.: Simple solution to the initial conditions problem in dynamic, non-linear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity. J. Appl. Econ. 20 (1), 39-54 (2005).