Comparison of continuous vs intermittent nasogastric enteral feeding in trauma patients: Perceptions and practice

Nutrition in Clinical Practice

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 118-122

  Steevens, Emmy C ^a   Lipscomb, A F ^a   Poole, Galen V ^a   Sacks, Gordon S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846225724     PISSN: 08845336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0115426502017002118     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Kudsk KA, Croce MA, Fabian TC, et al. Enteral versus parenteral feeding. Ann Surg 215:503-515, 1992.
2. Moore FA, Moore EE, Jones TN, et al. TEN versus total parenteral nutrition (TPN) following major abdominal trauma-reduced septic morbidity. J Trauma 29:916-922, 1989.
3. Campbell IT, Morton RP, Cole JA, et al. A comparison of the effects of intermittent and continuous nasogastric feeding on oxygen consumption and nitrogen balance of patients after major head and neck surgery. Am J Clin Nutr 38:870-878, 1983.
4. Pinchcofsky-Devin GD, Kaminski MV. Visceral protein increased associated with interrupt versus continuous enteral hyperalimentation. JPEN 9:474-476, 1985.
5. Ciocon JO, Galindo-Ciocon DJ, Tiessen C, et al. Continuous compared with intermittent tube feeding in the elderly. JPEN 16:525-528, 1992.
6. Coben RM, Weintraub A, DiMarino AJ, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux during gastrostomy feeding. Gastroenterology 106:13-18, 1994.
7. Fleiss JL. Random Numbers-Table A.7. IN The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments, 1st ed., Quigley S (ed). John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1986, p 405.
8. Bliss DZ, Guenter PA, Settle RG. Defining and reporting diarrhea in tube-fed patients-what a mess. Am J Clin Nutr 55:753-759, 1992.
9. Metheny NA, Clouse RE. Bedside methods for detecting aspiration in tube-fed patients. Chest 111:724-731, 1997.
10. Metheny NA, Aud MA, Wunderlich RJ. A survey of bedside methods used to detect pulmonary aspiration of enteral formula in intubated tube-fed patients. Am J Crit Care 8:160-167, 1999.
11. Bernstein L, Bachman TE, Meguid M, et al. Measurement of visceral protein status in assessing protein and energy malnutrition: Standard of care. Nutrition 11:169-171, 1995.
12. Mattox TW, Teasley-Strausburg KM. Overview of biochemical markers used for nutrition support. Ann Pharmacother 25:265-271, 1991.
13. Hiebert JM, Brown A, Anderson RG, et al. Comparison of continuous vs. intermittent tube feedings in adult burn patients. JPEN 5:73-75, 1981.
14. Kocan MJ, Hickisch SM. A comparison of continuous and intermittent enteral nutrition in NICU patients. J Neurosci Nurs 18:333-337, 1986.
15. Montejo JC. Enteral nutrition-related gastrointestinal complications in critically ill patients: A multicenter study. Crit Care Med 27:1447-1453, 1999.
16. Mullan H, Roubenoff RA, Roubenoff R. Risk of pulmonary aspiration among patients receiving enteral nutrition support. JPEN 16:160-164, 1992.
17. Grahm TW, Zadrozny DB, Harrington T. The benefits of early jejunal hyperalimentation in the head-injured patient. Neurosurgery 25:729-735, 1989.
18. Chiarelli A, Enzi G, Casadei A, et al. Very early enteral nutrition in burned patients. Am J Clin Nutr 51:1035-1039, 1990.
19. Kompan L, Kremzar B, Gradzijev E, et al. Effects of early enteral nutrition on intestinal permeability and the development of multiple organ failure after multiple injury. Intensive Care Med 25:157-161, 1999.