Students as research participants or as learners?

Journal of Academic Ethics

Volumn 4, Issue 1-4, 2006, Pages 205-220

  Shi, Ling ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Action research; Anonymous participation; Dual roles of the investigator; Ethics review; Informed consent

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846211033     PISSN: 15701727     EISSN: 15728544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10805-006-9028-y     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Adler, P. A. and Adler, P. (2002). Do university lawyers and the police define research values? In W. C. van den Hoonaard (Ed.), Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 34-42.
2. Barrett, P. A. (2001). The early mothering project: What happened when the words 'action research' came to life for a group of midwives, In P. Reason and H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, London: Sage, pp. 294-300.
3. Bradbury, H. and Reason, P. (2001). Broadening the bandwidth of validity: Issues and choice-points for improving the quality of action research, In P. Reason and H. Bradbury, (Eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, London: Sage, pp. 447-455.
4. Bresler, L. (1996). Ethical issues in the conduct and communication of ethnographic classroom research, Studies in Art Education 37(3), 133-144.
5. Course Outline. (2001-2003). Applied Linguistics for Teachers, University of British Columbia.
6. Eikeland, O. (2001). Action research as the hidden curriculum of the western tradition, In P. Reason and H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, London: Sage, pp. 145-155.
7. Everhart, R. B. (1975). Problems of doing fieldwork in educational evaluation, Human Organization 34(2), 205-215.
8. Friedman, V. J. (2001). Action science: Creating communities of inquiry in communities of practice, In P. Reason and H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, London: Sage, pp. 159-170.
9. Johnson, J. M. and Altheide, D. L. (2002). Reflections on professional ethics, In W. C. van den Hoonaard (Ed.), Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 59-69.
10. Kemmis, S. (2001). Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research: Emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jürgen Habermas, In P. Reason and H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, London: Sage, pp. 91-102.
11. Maguire, P. (2001). Uneven ground: Feminisms and action research, In P. Reason and H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, London: Sage, pp. 59-69.
12. Reason, P. (1994a). Human inquiry as discipline and practice, In P. Reason (Ed.), Participation in Human Inquiry, London: Sage, pp. 40-56.
13. Reason, P. (1994b). Inquiry and alienation, In P. Reason (Ed.), Participation in Human Inquiry, London: Sage, pp. 9-15.
14. Tobin, K. (1989). Ethical Concerns and Research in Science Classrooms: Resolved and Unresolved Dilemmas, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
15. van Beinum, H. (1998). Engaging in action research, In B. Boog, H. Coenen, L. Keune, and R. Lammerts (Eds.), The Complexity of Relationships in Action Research, Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, pp. 65-79.
16. van den Hoonaard, W. C., (Ed.) (2002). Walking the tightrope: Ethical issues for qualitative researchers, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. World Language Fair for Educators (2003). http://www.lerc.educ.ubc.ca/ LERC/courses/489/worldlang/index.html.