Stochastic environmental research risk assessment

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 201, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 118-126

  Nunes, Carla ^a,b   Soares, Amilcar ^a  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Ecosystems; Environmental impact; Environmental indices; Pollution; Risk Assessment

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOSYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; POLLUTION CONTROL; PROBABILISTIC LOGICS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICES; PENINSULA ECOSYSTEMS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STOCHASTICITY; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EURASIA; EUROPE; LISBOA [PORTUGAL]; LISBON; PORTUGAL; SETUBAL PENINSULA; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

EID: 33846209133     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Armstrong M., Chetboun G., and Hubbert P. Kriging the rainfall in Lesotho. In: Soares A. (Ed). Geostatistics Tróia'92 vol. 2 (1993), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 661-672
2. Bilonick R.A. The space-time distribution of sulphate deposition in the northeastern United States. Atmos. Environ. 19 (1985) 1829-1845
3. Bras R.L., and Rodrigues-Iturbe I. Random Functions and hydrology (1984), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA p. 559
4. Carvalho J., Soares A., and Bio A. Improving satellite images classification using remote and ground data integration by means of stochastic simulation. Int. J. Remote Sens. 27 16 (2006) 3375-3386
5. Chow T., Gaines K., Hodgson M., and Wilson M. Habitat and exposure modelling for ecological risk assessment: a case study for the raccoon on the Savannah River Site. Ecol. Model. 189 (2005) 151-157
6. Clerici, N., Bidini, A., Ferrarini, A., 2004. Sustainability at the local scale: defining highly agregated indices for assessing environmental performance. The province of Reggio Emilia (Italy) as a case study. Environmental Management (published online November 17, 2004).
7. Eynon B.P., and Switzer P. The variability of rainfall acidity. Can. J. Stat. 11 (1983) 11-24
8. Goovaerts P. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Characterization (1997), Oxford University Press, New York 483 pp
9. In: Haines-Young R., Green D., and Cousins S. (Eds). Landscape Ecology and GIS (1993), Taylor and Francis, London 288 pp
10. Hohn M.E., Liebhold A.M., and Gribko L.S. Geostatistical model for forecasting spatial dynamics of defoliation caused by the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Environ. Entomol. 22 (1993) 1066-1075
11. In: Hunsaker C., Goodchild M., Friedl M., and Case T. (Eds). Spatial Uncertainty in Ecology (2001), Springer, New York 402 pp
12. Lillesand T.M., and Kiefer R.W. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. 3rd ed. (1994), John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York 750 pp
13. Nunes C., and Soares A. Geostatistical space-time simulation model. Environmetrics 16 (2005) 393-404
14. Pykh Y.A., Kennedy E., and Grant W.E. An overview of systems analysis methods in delineating environmental indices. Ecol. Model. 130 (2000) 25-38
15. Rouhani S., and Wackernagel H. Multivariate geostatistical approach to space-time data analysis. Water Resour. Res. 26 (1990) 585-591
16. Santos, E., Almeida, J., Soares, A., 2000. Geostatistical characterisation of the migration patterns and pathways of the wood pigeon in Portugal. In: Kleingeld, W.J., Krige, D.G. (Eds.), Geostatistics 2000, vol. 2, South Africa, pp. 615-622.
17. Sample B., and Suter G. Estimating Exposure of Terrestrial Wildlife to Contaminants. Environmental Science Division (1994), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN ES/ER/TM-125
18. Silvert W. Fuzzy indices of environmental conditions. Ecol. Model. 130 (2000) 111-119
19. Suter G. Ecological Risk Assessment (1993), Lewis Publishers, Chelsea pp. 33-39
20. Switzer P. Statistical considerations in network design. Water Resour. Res. 15 (1979) 109-123
21. US Environmental Protection Agency. Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Process for Designing and Conducting Ecological Risk Assessment (1997), US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC EPA/630/R-021011