Increase in the molecular component of the adhesive pressure in polymer composites induced by electric charge

Composite Interfaces

Volumn 13, Issue 8-9, 2006, Pages 865-897

  Zhandarov, Serge ^a,b   Mäder, Edith ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF POLYMER RESEARCH DRESDEN   (Germany)

^b VA Belyi Metal Polymer Research Institute of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus   (Belarus)

Author keywords

ACTIVATION ENERGY; ADHESIVE PRESSURE; ELECTRIC CHARGE; GLASS FIBERS; KINETICS; LOCAL ADHESIVE BONDS; MICROBOND TEST; POLYMERS

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC CHARGE; ELECTRIC FIELDS; GLASS FIBERS; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); POLYMER BLENDS; PRESSURE EFFECTS;

ADHESIVE PRESSURE; LOCAL ADHESIVE BONDS; MICROBOND TEST;

COMPOSITE MATERIALS;

EID: 33846205133     PISSN: 09276440     EISSN: 15685543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156855406779366804     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Harris, F., 1990. Powder bonding technology:nonwoven structures and laminates. Nonwoven Ind., 21:42–44.
2. Kinloch, A. J., 1994. Adhesion and Adhesives:Science and Technology, London:Chapman and Hall.
3. Zaborskaya, L. V., Dovgyalo, V. A., and Yurkevich, O. R., 1995. On the interaction of molten thermoplastics and fibre surfaces. J. Adhesion Sci. Technol., 9:61–71.
4. Lipatov, Y. S., 1995. Polymer Reinforcement, ChemTec Publishing.
5. Pisanova, E., and Zhandarov, S., 2001. Reversible and irreversible adhesion of polymers:possibilities for measurement and calculation. J. Adhesion, 75:89–127.
6. Fowkes, F. M., 1991. Physicochemical Aspects of Polymer Surfaces, Edited by:Mittal, K. L., Vol. 2, 153–175. New York:Plenum Press.
7. Derjaguin, B. V., Krotova, N. A., and Smilga, V. P., 1978. Adhesion of Solids, New York:Consultants Bureau.
8. Pisanova, E., Zhandarov, S., and Schneider, K., 1999. Kinetics of adhesive contact formation between thermoplastic melts and solid surfaces:Effect on bond strength. J. Macromol. Sci. — Phys., B38:945–955.
9. Wu, J., Kang, E. T., Neoh, K. G., Tan, K. L., Cui, C. Q., and Lim, T. B., 1999. Surface modification of poly(tetrafluoroethylene) films by graft copolymerization for adhesion improvement with sputtered In-Sn oxides. J. Adhesion, 71:357–376.
10. Mäder, E., and Gao, S., 2001. Prospect of nanoscale interphase evaluation to predict composite properties. J. Adhesion Sci. Technol., 15:1015–1037.
11. Lange, J., and Wyser, Y., 2003. Recent innovations in barrier technologies for plastic packaging — a review. Packaging Technol. Sci., 16:149–158.
12. Park, S.-J., and Kim, J.-S., 2001. Surface energy characterization of modified carbon blacks and its relationship to composites tearing properties. J. Adhesion Sci. Technol., 15:1443–1452.
13. Mironov, V. S., Zhandarov, S. F., Dovgyalo, V. A., and Yurkevich, O. R., 1995. Effect of electrophysical activation of components of polymer composites on their adhesional interaction. Mech. Compos. Mater., 31:734–741.
14. Honda, H., Kimura, M., Honda, F., Matsuno, T., and Koishi, M., 1994. Preparation of monolayer particle coated powder by the dry impact blending process utilizing mechanochemical treatment. Colloids and Surfaces, A82:117–128.
15. Awenat, K. M., Davis, P. J., Moloney, M. G., and Ebenezer, W., 2005. A chemical method for the convenient surface functionalisation of polymers. Chem. Comm., 8:990–992.
16. Bismarck, A., Lee, A. F., Saraç, A. S., Schulz, E., and Wilson, K., 2005. Electrocoating of carbon fibres:a route for interface control in carbon fibre reinforced poly methylmethacrylate?. Compos. Sci. Technol., 65:1564–1573.
17. Hughes, J. F., 1989. Powder coating technology. J. Electrostatics, 23:3–23.
18. Zhandarov, S. F., Dovgyalo, V. A., and Pisanova, E. V., 1994. The effect of electric field on the bond strength between the thermoplastic polymers and carbon fibers. J. Adhesion Sci. Technol., 8:995–1005.
19. Nardin, M., and Schultz, J., 1993. Relationship between fibre-matrix adhesion and the interfacial shear strength in polymer-based composites. Composite Interfaces, 1:424–431.
20. Pisanova, E., Zhandarov, S., and Mäder, E., 2001. How can adhesion be determined from micromechanical tests?. Composites:Part A, 32:425–434.
21. Lee, L. H., 1991. Adhesive Bonding, New York:Plenum Press.
22. Allara, D. L., Fowkes, F. M., Noolandi, J., Rubloff, G. W., and Tirrell, M. V., 1986. Bonding and adhesion of polymer interfaces. Material Sci. Engng., 83:213–226.
23. Moore, D. R., and Cervenka, A., 2002. Future requirements in the characterization of continuous fiber-reinforced polymeric composites (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure and Applied Chem., 74:601–628.
24. Waterbury, M. C., and Drzal, L. T., 1990. “ Interfacial shear strengths of carbon fibers in bisphenol-A polycarbonate ”. In Controlled Interphases in Composite Materials, Edited by:Ishida, H., 731–739. New York:Elsevier Press.
25. Pisanova, E. V., Zhandarov, S. F., and Dovgyalo, V. A., 1994. Interfacial adhesion and failure modes in single filament thermoplastic composites. Polym. Compos., 15:147–155.
26. Pisanova, E., Dutschk, V., and Lauke, B., 1998. Work of adhesion and local adhesional strength in glass fibre - thermoplastic polymer systems. J. Adhesion Sci. Technol., 12:305–322.
27. Privalko, V. P., 1986. Molecular Structure and Properties of Polymers, Leningrad:Khimia.
28. nd edn., Upper Saddle River, N. J:Prentice Hall Publishers.
29. Ruckenstein, E., 2002. Microscopic origin of macroscopic wetting. Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 206:3–10.
30. Roginskii, S. Z., 1958. Adsorption und Katalyse an Inhomogenen Oberflächen, Berlin:Akademie Verlag.
31. Vyazovkin, S., 2000. On the phenomenon of variable activation energy for condensed phase reactions. New J. Chem., 24:913–917.
32. Seebauer, E. G., 1994. Quantitative extraction of continuous distributions of energy states and preexponential factors from thermal desorption spectra. Surf. Sci., 316:391–405.
33. Reusch, W., 1999. Virtual Textbook of Organic Chemistry, Michigan State University. http://www.cem.msu.edu/∼reusch/VirtualText/physprop.htm#exp5
34. Zhandarov, S., and Mäder, E., 2003. Some reflections on the ‘self-consistent’ approach to the calculation of acid-base parameters of solids and liquids from wetting data. Composite Interfaces, 10:41–60.
35. Dovgyalo, V. A., Zhandarov, S. F., and Yurkevich, O. R., 1990. On some regularities of charge transfer in fluidized-bed dispersed dielectrics. J. Engng. Phys. (USSR), 59:989–995.
36. Zhandarov, S. F., Dovgyalo, V. A., Pisanova, E. V., and Mironov, V. S., 1993. Effect of electric fields and charges on adhesive interaction between the components of fibrous polymer composites. Mech. Compos. Mater., 29:267–273.
37. Miller, B., Muri, P., and Rebenfeld, L., 1987. A microbond method for determination of the shear strength of a fiber-resin interface. Compos. Sci. Technol., 28:17–32.
38. Zhandarov, S., and Mäder, E., 2005. Characterization of fiber/matrix interface strength:applicability of different tests, approaches and parameters. Compos. Sci. Technol., 65:149–160.
39. Piggott, M. R., and Xiong, Y. J., 1994. Visualisation of debonding of fully and partially embedded glass fibres in epoxy resins. Compos. Sci. Technol., 52:535–540.
40. Marotzke, C., 1993. Influence of the fiber length on the stress transfer from glass and carbon fibers into a thermoplastic matrix in the pull-out test. Composite Interfaces, 1:153–166.
41. Liu, C.-H., and Nairn, J. A., 1999. Analytical and experimental methods for a fracture mechanics interpretation of the microbond test including the effects of friction and thermal stresses. Int. J. Adhesive Adhesives, 19:59–70.
42. Marotzke, C., and Qiao, L., 1997. Interfacial crack propagation arising in single-fiber pull-out tests. Compos. Sci. Technol., 57:887–897.
43. Scheer, R. J., and Nairn, J. A., 1995. A comparison of several fracture mechanics methods for measuring interfacial toughness with microbond tests. J. Adhesion, 53:45–68.
44. Piggott, M. R., 1995. A new model for interface failure in fibre-reinforced polymers. Compos. Sci. Technol., 55:269–276.
45. th edn., Cambridge:Wolfram Media/Cambridge University Press.
46. Zhandarov, S., Pisanova, E., and Mäder, E., 2000. Is there any contradiction between the stress and energy failure criteria in micromechanical tests? Pt II. Crack propagation:effect of friction on forcedisplacement curves. Composite Interfaces, 7:149–175.
47. Nayfeh, A. H., 1977. Thermomechanically induced interfacial stresses in fibrous composites. Fibre Sci. Technol., 10:195–209.
48. Zhandarov, S., and Mäder, E., in press. Peak force as function of the embedded length in the pull-out and microbond tests:Effect of specimen geometry. J. Adhesion Sci. Technol.
49. Henstenburg, R. B., and Phoenix, S. L., 1989. Interfacial shear strength studies using the single-filamentcomposite test:II. A probability model and Monte Carlo simulation. Polym. Compos., 10:390–408.
50. Tamuzs, V. P., Korabelnikov, Y. G., Rashkovan, I. A., Karklins, A. A., Gorbatkina, Y. A., and Zakharova, T. Y., 1991. Determination of strength of reinforcing fibres and their adhesion to matrices from the results of testing single filaments in a polymer block. Mech. Compos. Mater., 27:641–647.
51. Yavin, B., Gallis, H. E., Scherf, J., Eitan, A., and Wagner, H. D., 1991. Continuous monitoring of the fragmentation phenomenon in single fiber composite materials. Polym. Compos., 12:436–446.
52. Zhandarov, S. F., and Pisanova, E. V., 1995. Two approaches to interfacial shear strength calculation based on the single fibre composite test. Mech. Compos. Mater., 31:446–461.
53. Gorbatkina, Y. A., 1992. Adhesive Strength of Fiber-Polymer Systems, New York:Ellis Horwood.
54. Bely, V. A., Egorenkov, N. I., and Pleskachevskii, Y. M., 1971. Polymer Adhesion to Metals, Minsk:Navuka i Technika.
55. Dovgyalo, V. A., and Yurkevich, O. R., 1992. Composite Materials and Coatings Based on Dispersed Polymers, Minsk:Navuka i Technika.