SENS survives the challenge: Now let's get to work

Rejuvenation Research

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 429-430

  De Grey, Aubrey D N J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGING; CONSENSUS; EDITORIAL; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GERONTOLOGY; HUMAN; LONGEVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SENESCENCE;

AGING; GERIATRICS; HUMANS; REJUVENATION;

EID: 33846200451     PISSN: 15491684     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/rej.2006.9.429     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. de Grey ADNJ. The SENS Challenge: $20,000 says the foreseeable defeat of aging is not laughable. Rejuvenation Res 2005;8:207-210.
2. Pontin J. Is defeating aging a dream? MIT Technol Rev 2006;109:80-84.
3. Warner H, Anderson J, Austad S, Bergamini E, Bredesen D, Butler R, Carnes BA, Clark BF, Cristofalo V, Faulkner J, Guarente L, Harrison DE, Kirkwood T, Lithgow G, Martin G, Masoro E, Melov S, Miller RA, Olshansky SJ, Partridge L, Pereira-Smith O, Peris T, Richardson A, Smith J, von Zglinicki T, Wang E, Wei JY, Williams TF. Science fact and the SENS agenda: what can we reasonably expect from ageing research? EMBO Rep 2005;6:1006-1008.
4. Estep P, Kaeberlein M, Kapahi P, Kennedy BK, Lithgow GJ, Martin GM, Melov S, Powers RW, Tissenbaum HA. Preston Estep et al. dissent. MIT Technology Review 2006. URL: www.technologyreview. com/read_article.aspx?id=17146&ch= biotech.
5. de Grey ADNJ. Leon Kass: quite substantially right. Rejuvenation Res 2004;7:89-91.
6. de Grey ADNJ. Three self-evident life-extension truths. Rejuvenation Res 2004;7:165-167.
7. de Grey ADNJ. Aging, childlessness, or overpopulation: the future's right to choose. Rejuvenation Res 2004;7:237-238.
8. Warner HR. Scientific and ethical concerns regarding engineering human longevity. Rejuvenation Res 2006;9:440-442.
9. de Grey ADNJ. Is SENS a farrago? Rejuvenation Res 2006;9:436-439.
10. de Grey ADNJ. SENS is hard, yes, but not too hard to try: a reply to Warner. Rejuvenation Res 2006;9:443-445.