QMatch - Using paths to match XML schemas

Data and Knowledge Engineering

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 260-282

  Tansalarak, Naiyana ^a   Claypool, Kajal T ^a  

^a University of Massachusetts Lowell   (United States)

Author keywords

Hybrid schema matching; Schema integration; Schema matching; XML schema matching

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATABASE SYSTEMS; HYBRID COMPUTERS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; QUERY LANGUAGES; SEMANTICS; XML;

HYBRID SCHEMA MATCHING; SCHEMA INTEGRATION; SCHEMA MATCHING; XML SCHEMA MATCHING;

SCHEMATIC DIAGRAMS;

EID: 33846199229     PISSN: 0169023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.datak.2006.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. D. AnHai, P. Domingos, A. Haley, Reconciling schemas of disparate data sources: a machine-learning approach, in: SIGMOD, 2001.
2. Bairoch A., and Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence databank and its supplement TrEMBL. Nucleic Acid Res. 1 27 (1999) 49-54
3. Bergamaschi S., Castano S., Vincini M., and Beneventano D. Semantic integration of heterogeneous information sources. Data Knowl. Eng. 36 3 (2001) 215-249
4. Bright M.W., Hurson A.R., and Pakzad S.H. Automated resolution of semantic heterogeneity in multidatabases. TODS 19 2 (1994) 212-253
5. F. Bry, P. Kroger, A computational biology database digest: data, data analysis, and data management, Int. J. Distrib. Parallel Databases, special issue on Bioinformatics, 2002.
6. J. Berlin, A. Motro AutoPlex: automated discovery of content for virtual databases, in: CoopIS, 2001, pp. 108-122.
7. Robin Dhamankar, Yoonkyong Lee, AnHai Doan, Alon Y. Halevy, Pedro Domingos, imap: Discovering complex mappings between database schemas, in: SIGMOD Conference, 2004, pp. 383-394.
8. Hong Hai Do, E. Rahm, COMA - a system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches, in: Int. Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 2002.
9. GDB. GDB: The Genome Database. Available from: .
10. Bin He, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang, Statistical schema matching across Web query interfaces, in: SIGMOD Conference, 2003, pp. 217-228.
11. V. Hegde, QoM: A taxonomy based approach to schema matching, Master's Thesis, UMass-Lowell, April 2004.
12. Haas L.M., Miller R.J., Niswonger B., Roth M.T., Schwarz P., and Wimmers E.L. Transforming heterogeneous data with database middleware: beyond integration. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 22 1 (1999) 31-36
13. Jaewoo Kang, Jeffrey F. Naughton, On schema matching with opaque column names and data values, in: SIGMOD Conference, 2003, pp. 205-216.
14. Wen-Syan Li, C. Clifton, Semantic integration in heterogeneous databases using neural networks, in: Int. Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 1994.
15. Lin D. An information-theoretic definition of similarity. Proc. 15th International Conf. on Machine Learning (1998), Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, CA 296-304
16. J. Madhavan, P. Bernstein, E. Rahm, Generic schema matching with cupid, in: Int. Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 2001, pp. 49-58.
17. G.A. Miller, Wordnet: a lexical database for English language, 2002. Available from: .
18. A. Neirman, H.V. Jagadish, evaluating structural similarity in XML documents, in: International Workshop on the Web and Databases, 2002.
19. Ted Pedersen, Siddharth Patwardhan, Jason Michelizzi, Wordnet::Similarity - measuring the relatedness of concepts, in: AAAI, 2004, pp. 1024-1025.
20. PubMed. Available from: .
21. Zhibiao Wu, Martha Palmer, Verb semantics and lexical selection, in: 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, 1994, pp. 133-138.