Prior-based segmentation and shape registration in the presence of perspective distortion

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 309-328

  Riklin Raviv, Tammy ^a   Kiryati, Nahum ^a   Sochen, Nir ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Homography; Level sets; Prior based segmentation; Projective transformation; Registration; Variational methods

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

HOMOGRAPHY; LEVEL-SETS; PRIOR-BASED SEGMENTATION; PROJECTIVE TRANSFORMATION; REGISTRATION; VARIATIONAL METHODS;

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION;

EID: 33846197950     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: 15731405     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-006-9042-y     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aubert, G. and Kornprobst, P. 2002. Mathematical Problems in Image Processing: Partial Differential Equations and the Calculus of Variations, Springer.
2. Binford, T.O. 1971. Visual perception by computer. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Systems and Control.
3. Chan, T.F. and Vese, L.A. 2001. Active contours withoutedges. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 10(2):266-277.
4. Chen, Y., Tagare, H.D., Thiravenkadam, S., Huang, F., Wilson, D., Gopinath, K.S., Briggs, R.W., and Geiser, E.A. 2002. Using prior shapes in geometric active contours in a variational framework. International Joumal of Computer Vision, 50(3):315-328.
5. Coleman, T.F. Optimization toolbox: Quasi newton methods. The Mathworks, Inc., 1994-2005. http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/toolbox.
6. Cone, in mathematics. 2001. The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th Edition. Columbia University Press.
7. Cootes, G.J., Edwards, T.F., and Taylor, C.J. 1998. Active appearance models. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, volume 2, pages 484-498.
8. Cootes, T.F., Taylor, C.J., Cooper, D.H., and Graham, J. 1995. Active shape models - their training and application. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 61(1):38-59.
9. Cremers, D., Kohlberger, T., and Schnörr, C. 2003. Shape statistics in kernel space for variational image segmentation. Pattern Recognition, 36(9): 1929-1943.
10. Cremers, D. and Soatto, S. 2003. A pseudo-distance for shape priors in level set segmentation. In Workshop on Variational, Geometric and Level Set Methods in Computer Vision, pages 169-176.
11. Cremers, D., Sochen, N., and Schnorr, C. 2003. Towards recognition-based variational segmentation using shape priors and dynamic labeling. In Intl. Conf. on Scale-Space Theories in Computer Vision, pages 388-400.
12. Cremers, D., Sochen, N., and Schnörr, C. 2006. Multiphase dynamic labeling for variational recognition-driven image segmentation. International Journal of Computer Vision, 66(1):67-81.
13. Duci, A., Yezzi, A., Mitter, S., and Soatto, S. 2002. Region matching with missing parts. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, volume 3, pages 48-64.
14. Faugeras, O. 1993. Three-Dimensional Computer Vision: A Geometric Viewpoint. MIT Press.
15. Faugeras, O., Luong, Q.T., and Papadopoulo, T. 2001. The Geometry of Multiple Images. MIT Press.
16. Forsyth, D.A. and Ponce, J. 2003. Computer Vision: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall.
17. Haralick, R.M. and Shapiro, L.G. 1993. Computer and Robot Vision, volume II. Addison-Wesley. pp. 593-594.
18. Hartley, R.I. and Zisserman, A. 2003. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition.
19. Huang, X., Li, Z., and Metaxas, D. 2004. Learning coupled prior-shape and appearance models tor segmentation. In Medical Image. Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI04, vol-ume I, pages 60-69.
20. Irani, M. and Anandan, P. 1999. All about direct methods. In W. Triggs, A. Zisserman, and R. Szeliski, editors, Vision Algorithms: Theory and Practice. Springer-Verlag.
21. Jain, A.K., Zhong, Y., and Dubuisson-Jolly, M.P. 1998. Deformable template models: A review. Signal Processing, 71(2):109-129.
22. Jain, R., Kasturi, R., and Schunck, E.G. 1995. Machine Vision. McGraw-Hill. pp. 482-483.
23. Jurie, F. and Dhome, M. 2001. Real time 3d template matching. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 1, pages 791-797.
24. Leventon, M., Faugeraus, O., Crimson, W., and Wells, W. III. 2000a. Level set based segmentation with intensity and curvature priors. In Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis Proceedings, pages 4-11.
25. Leventon, M.E., Grimson, W.E.L., and Faugeras, O. 2000b. Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume I, pages 316-323.
26. Levine, M.D. 1985. Vision in Man and Machine. McGraw-Hill. pp. 46-53.
27. Ma, Y., Soatto, S., Košecká, J., and Sastry, S.S. 2003. An Invitation to 3-D Vision. Springer-Verlag.
28. Marr, D. 1982. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. W.H. Freeman.
29. Miller, M.I. and Younes, L. 2001. Group actions, homeomorphisms and matching: a general framework. International Journal of Computer Vision, 41:61-84. Special issue on statistical and computational theories of vision: Part 2.
30. Mumford, D. and Shah, J. 1989. Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems. Communications on Pure, and Applied Mathematics, 42:577-684.
31. Neider, J.A. and Mead, R. 1965. A simplex method for function minimization. Computer Journal, 7:308-313.
32. Osher, S. and Sethian, J.A. 1988. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 79:12-49.
33. Rao, K.G. and Medioni, G. 1992. Generalized cones: Useful geometric properties. In Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, pages 185-208.
34. Riklin-Raviv, T. 2005. Segmentation examples, http://www.eng.tau.ac.il/ ~tammy/PriorBasedGif.htm.
35. Riklin-Raviv, T., Kiryati, N., and Sochen, N. 2004. Unlevel-sets: Geometry and prior-based segmentation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, volume 4, pages 50-61.
36. Rousson, M. and Paragios, N. 2002. Shape priors for level set representation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 78-92.
37. Springer, C.E. 1964. Geometry and Analysis of Projective Spaces, Freeman.
38. Stockman, G.C. and Agrawala, A.K. 1977. Equivalence of hough curve detection to template matching. Communications of the ACM, 20(11):820-822.
39. Torn, A. and Zilinskas, A. 1989. Global Optimization, volume 350 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer.
40. Tsai, A., Yezzi, A., Jr., Wells, W.M., III, Tempany, C., Tucker, D., Fan, A., Crimson, W.E.L., and Willsky, A.S. 2003. A shape-based approach to the segmentation of medical imagery using level sets. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 22(2): 137-154.
41. Veltkamp, R.C. and Hagedoorn, M. 2000. Shape similarity measure, properties and constructions. In Principles of Visual Information Retrieval, pages 467-476, London, UK. Springer-Verlag.
42. Veltkamp, R.C. and Hagedoorn, M. 2001. State of the art in shape matching. In Principles of Visual Infoimation Retrieval, pages 87-119. Springer-Verlag, London, UK.
43. Vese, L.A. and Chan, T.F. 2002. A multiphase level set framework for image segmentation using mumford and shah model. International Journal of Computer Vision, 50(3):271-293.
44. Weisstein, E.D. Euler angles. From MathWorld-A Wolfram Web Resource., 1999-2005. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EulerAngles.html.