Disrupting digital library development with scenario informed design

Interacting with Computers

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 70-82

  Blandford, Ann ^a   Keith, Suzette ^b   Butterworth, Richard ^b   Fields, Bob ^b   Furniss, Dominic ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Digital libraries; Scenario based design; Software development processes; Usability evaluation

Indexed keywords

FUNCTION EVALUATION; FUNCTIONS; PROBLEM SOLVING; PRODUCT DESIGN; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

DISCRETE FUNCTIONS; SCENARIO BASED DESIGN; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES; USABILITY EVALUATION;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 33846194012     PISSN: 09535438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.intcom.2006.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bainbridge, D., Thompson, J., Witten, I.H., 2003. Assembling and enriching digital library collections. In: Proc. Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. Houston, Texas, pp. 323-334.
2. Bates M. The cascade of interactions in the digital library interface. Information Processing and Management 38 (2002) 381-400. http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/bates/articles/cascade.html Available from
3. Bellotti V. Implications of current design practice for the use of HCI techniques. In: Jones D., and Winder R. (Eds). People and Computers IV, Proceedings of HCI'89 (1989), Cambridge University Press 13-34
4. Bellotti, V., Buckingham Shum, S., Maclean, A., Hammond, N., 1995. Multidisciplinary modelling in HCI design... in theory and in practice. In: Proceedings of CHI '95 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing, pp. 146-153.
5. Blandford A., and Rugg G. A case study on integrating contextual information with usability evaluation. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 57 1 (2002) 75-99
6. Blandford, A., Keith, S., Connell, I., Edwards, H., 2004. Analytical usability evaluation for Digital Libraries: a case study. In: Proceedings of ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 27-36.
7. Blandford A., Keith S., and Fields B. Claims Analysis 'in the wild': a case study on digital library development. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 21 2 (2006) 197-218
8. Bødker S., and Christiansen E. Scenarios as springboards in design. In: Bowker G., Gasser L., Star S.L., and Turner W. (Eds). Social Science Research, Technical Systems and Cooperative Work (1997), Erlbaum 217-234
9. Bødker, S., Nielsen, C., GravesPetersen, M.G., 2000. Creativity, Cooperation and Interactive Design. In: Proc. DIS 2000. ACM, pp. 252-261.
10. Buckingham Shum, S., Hammond, N., 1994. Transferring HCI Modelling and Design Techniques to Practitioners: A Framework and Empirical Work. In: Proceedings of HCI'94: People and Computers IX, Glasgow, 23-26 August, 1994. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 21-36.
11. Butterworth, R., Ghosh, M., Wise, C., 2005. Designing for broadening access: model based iterative design of digital library resources for life-long learners. Presented at Digital Resources for the Humanities 2005. Extended abstract available from: .
12. Carroll J.M. Making use is more than a matter of task analysis. Interacting with Computers 14 (2002) 619-627
13. Carroll J.M., and Rosson M.B. Getting around the task-artifact cycle: how to make claims and design by scenario. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 10 2 (1992) 181-221
14. Champeny, L., Borgman, C., Leazer, G., Gilliland-Swetland, A., Millwood, A., D'Avolio, L., Finley, J., Smart, L., 2004. Developing a digital learning environment: an evaluation of design and implementation processes. In: Proc. JCDL 2004, pp. 37-46.
15. Cooper A. The Inmates are Running the Asylum (1999), Sams Publishing, Indianapolis
16. Hammond N., Jorgensen A., MacLean A., Barnard P., and Long J. Design practice and interface usability. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1983) 40-44
17. Heinbokel T., Sonnentag S., Frese M., Stolte W., and Brodbeck F. Dont underestimate the problems of user centredness in software development projects there are many. Behaviour and Information Technology 15 4 (1996) 226-236
18. Hertzum M., and Jacobsen N.E. The evaluator effect: a chilling fact about usability evaluation methods. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 13 4 (2001) 421-443
19. John B. On our case study of claims analysis and other usability evaluation methods. Behaviour and Information Technology 17 4 (1998) 244-246
20. Komlodi, A., Marchionini, G., 1998. Key frame preview techniques for video browsing. In: Proc. ACM Digital Libraries 1998, pp. 118-125.
21. Kyrillidou, M., Giersch, S., 2005. Developing the DigiQUAL protocol for digital library evaluation. In: Proc. 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 172-173.
22. MacLean A., Young R.M., Bellotti V., and Moran T. Questions, options, and criteria: elements of design space analysis. Human-Computer Interaction 6 3-4 (1991) 201-250 In: Carroll J.M., Moran T.P. (Eds.), Special Issue on Design Rationale
23. Maiden, N., Robertson, S., 2005. Developing use cases and scenarios in the requirements process. In: Proc. ICSE 2005, pp. 561-570.
24. Newell A., and Card S.K. The prospects for psychological science in human-computer interaction. Human Computer Interaction 1 (1985) 209-242
25. Nielsen J. Heuristic evaluation. In: Nielsen J., and Mack R. (Eds). Usability Inspection Methods (1994), John Wiley, New York 25-62
26. O'Neill, E., 1998. User-developer cooperation in software development: building common ground and usable systems. Ph.D. Thesis. Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London.
27. Paddison, C., Englefield, P., 2003. Applying heuristics to perform a rigorous accessibility inspection in a commercial context. In: Proc. CUU 2003, pp. 126-133.
28. Papadakis, I., Andreou, I., Chrissikopoulos, V., 2002. Interactive search results. In: Agosti, M., Thanos, C. (Eds.), Proc. ECDL 2002. Springer LNCS 2458, pp. 448-462.
29. Rosson M.B., and Carroll J.M. Usability Engineering (2002), Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco
30. Rosson M., Maass S., and Kellogg W. The designer as user building requirements for the design tools from design practice. Communications of the ACM 31 11 (1988) 1288-1298
31. Spasser M. The Flora of North America Project: Making the case [study] for Social Realist Theory. In: Bishop A.P., Van House N.A., and Buttenfield B.P. (Eds). Digital Library Use (2003), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
32. Spencer, R., 2000. The streamlined cognitive walkthrough method, working around social constraints encountered in a software development company. In: Proc. CHI'2000, pp. 353-359.
33. Sutcliffe A.G., and Carroll J.M. Designing claims for reuse in interactive systems design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 50 (1999) 213-241
34. Vredenburg, K., Mao, J.-Y., Smith, P., Carey, T., 2002. A survey of user-centred design practice. In: Proc. ACM CHI 2002, pp. 471-478.
35. Wharton C., Rieman J., Lewis C., and Polson P. The cognitive walkthrough method: a practitioner's guide. In: Nielsen J., and Mack R. (Eds). Usability Inspection Methods (1994), John Wiley, New York 105-140
36. Witten I.H., Bainbridge D., and Boddie S.J. Greenstone: open-source digital library software with end-user collection building. Online Information Review 25 5 (2001) 288-298
37. Young R.M., and Barnard P.J. The use of scenarios in human computer interaction: turbocharging the tortoise of cumulative science. In: Carroll J.M., and Tanner P.P. (Eds). Proc CHI + GI '87-Human Factors in Computing Systems and Graphics Interface (1987), ACM, New York 291-296