Reply from Walter Herzog (on behalf of the authors) and Tim Leonard [2]

Journal of Physiology

Volumn 578, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 617-620

  Herzog, Walter ^a   Leonard, Tim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; MYOSIN;

ACTIN MYOSIN INTERACTION; HUMAN; LETTER; MUSCLE FIBRIL; MUSCLE FORCE; MUSCLE ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; MUSCLE LENGTH; MYOTATIC REFLEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SARCOMERE LENGTH; HYDROLYSIS; MUSCLE RIGIDITY; MUSCLE STRENGTH; MUSCLE STRETCHING; MUSCLE TONE; NONHUMAN; SARCOMERE LENGTH NON UNIFORMITY THEORY; THEORY;

EID: 33846190148     PISSN: 00223751     EISSN: 14697793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.125443     Document Type: Letter

References (24)

1. Abbott BC & Aubert XM (1952). The force exerted by active striated muscle during and after change of length. J Physiol 117, 77-86.
2. Altman D, Sweeney HL & Spudich JA (2004). The mechanism of myosin VI translocation and its load-induced anchoring. Cell 116, 737-749.
3. Cook CS & McDonagh MJN (1995). Force responses to controlled stretches of electrically stimulated human muscle-tendon complex. Exp Physiol 80, 477-490.
4. De Ruiter CJ, Didden WJM, Jones DA & de Haan A (2000). The force-velocity relationship of human adductor pollicis muscle during stretch and the effects of fatigue. J Physiol 526, 671-681.
5. Edman KAP, Elzinga G & Noble MIM (1982). Residual force enhancement after stretch of contracting frog single muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol 80, 769-784.
6. Herzog W, Lee EJ & Rassier DE (2006). Residual force enhancement in skeletal muscle. J Physiol 574, 635-642.
7. Herzog W & Leonard TR (2002). Force enhancement following stretching of skeletal muscle: A new mechanism. J Exp Biol 205, 1275-1283.
8. Herzog W, Schachar R & Leonard TR (2003). Characterization of the passive component of force enhancement following active stretching of skeletal muscle. J Exp Biol 206, 3634-3643.
9. Hill AV (1938). The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. Proc R Soc Lond 126, 136-195.
10. Huxley AF (1957). Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem 7, 255-318.
11. Huxley HE & Hanson J (1954). Changes in cross-striations of muscle during contraction and stretch and their structural implications. Nature 173, 973-976.
12. Huxley AF & Niedergerke R (1954). Structural changes in muscle during contraction. Interference microscopy of living muscle fibres. Nature 173, 971-973.
13. Josephson RK & Stokes DR (1999). Work-dependent deactivation of a crustacean muscle. J Exp Biol 202, 2551-2565.
14. Linari M, Lucii L, Reconditi M, Casoni ME, Amenitsch H, Bernstorff S, Piazzesi G & Lombardi V (2000). A combined mechanical and x-ray diffraction study of stretch potentiation in single frog muscle fibres. J Physiol 526, 589-596.
15. Mehta A, Altman D, Forrester K, Spudich J & Herzog W (2006). Is. residual force enhancement caused by a stretch induced increase in the duty ratio of cross bridges? Sixth International Muscle Energetics Conference, Banff, Canada, July 22-27.
16. Morgan DL, Whitehead NP, Wise AK, Gregory JE & Proske U (2000). Tension changes in the cat soleus muscle following slow stretch or shortening of the contracting muscle. J Physiol 522, 503-513.
17. Peterson D, Rassier D & Herzog W (2004). Force enhancement in single skeletal muscle fibres on the ascending limb of the force-length relationship. J Exp Biol 207, 2787-2791.
18. Purcell TJ, Sweeney HL & Spudich JA (2005). A force-dependent state controls the coordination of processive myosin V. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102, 13873-13878.
19. Rassier DE & Herzog W (2005). Relationship between force and stiffness in muscle fibres after stretch and altering cross-bridge kinetics. J Appl Physiol 99, 1769-1775.
20. Rassier DE, Herzog W, Wakeling J & Syme D (2003). Stretch-induced, steady-state force enhancement in single skeletal muscle fibers exceeds the isometric force at optimal fibre length. J Biomechanics 36, 1309-1316.
21. Rief M, Rock RS, Mehta AD, Mooseker MS, Cheney RE & Spudich JA (2000). Myosin-V stepping kinetics: A molecular model for processivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97, 9482-9486.
22. Sugi H (1972). Tension changes during and after stretch in frog muscle fibers. J Physiol 225, 237-253.
23. Telley IA, Stehle R, Ranatunga KW, Pfitzer G, Stussi E & Denoth J (2006). Dynamic behaviour of half-sarcomeres during and after stretch in activated rabbit psoas myofibrils: Sarcomere asymmetry but no 'sarcomere popping'. J Physiol 573, 173-185.
24. Veigel C, Schmitz S, Wang F & Sellers JR (2005). Load-dependent kinetics of myosin-V can explain its high processivity. Nat Cell Biol 7, 861-869.