Pittsburgh Registry of Infant Multiplets (PRIM): An update

Twin Research and Human Genetics

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1006-1008

  Jenkins, Elizabeth A ^a   Maher, Brion S ^a   Marazita, Mary L ^a   Tarter, Ralph E ^a   Ganger, Jennifer B ^b   Watt Morse, Margaret ^c   Vanyukov, Michael M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIOR DISORDER; DENTAL HEALTH; HERITABILITY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR;

ABNORMALITIES; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; GENETICS, BEHAVIORAL; HUMANS; INFANT; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; MULTIPLE BIRTH OFFSPRING; PATIENT SELECTION; PENNSYLVANIA; PILOT PROJECTS; REGISTRIES; TWIN STUDIES; TWINS, DIZYGOTIC; TWINS, MONOZYGOTIC;

EID: 33846189292     PISSN: 18324274     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1375/183242706779462921     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. (2000). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 11/2-5/LDR and 2000 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
2. Babyonyshev, M., Ganger, J., Pesetsky, D., & Wexler, K. (2001). The maturation of grammatical principles: Evidence from Russian unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 1-44.
3. Borer, H., & Wexler, K. (1992). Bi-unique relations and the maturation of grammatical principles. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 10, 147-189.
4. Conners C. (2000). Conners' Continuous Performance Test II. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi Health Systems.
5. Ganger, J., Dunn, S., & Gordon, P. (2005). Genes prevail when the input fails: A twin study of the passive voice. Poster presented at the Society for Research in Child Development biennial meeting, Atlanta, GA.
6. Gordon, P., & Chafetz, J. (1990). Verb-based versus class-based accounts of actionality effects in children's comprehension of passives. Cognition, 36, 227-254.
7. Heiser, P., Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, M., Frey, J., Smidt, J., Grabarkiewicz, J., Friedel, S., Kuhnau, W., Schmidtke, J., Remschmidt, H., & Hebebrand, J. (2006). Twin study on heritability of activity, attention, and impulsivity as assessed by objective measures. Journal of Attention Disorders, 9, 575-581.
8. Holmes, J., Hever, T., Hewitt, L., Ball, C., Taylor, E., Rubia, K., & Thapar, A. (2002). A pilot twin study of psychological measures of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behavior Genetics, 32, 389-395.
9. Jenkins, E. (2006). A study of minor physical anomalies in twin pairs age 5-12 years: A predictor of behavioral variation? Master of Science thesis, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health.
10. McCarthy, D. (1972). McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
11. Nichols, R. C., & Bilbro, W. C. (1966). Diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genetica et Statistica Medica, 16, 265-275.
12. Sivkov, S. T., & Akabaliev, V. H. (2003). Minor physical anomalies in schizophrenic patients and normal controls. Psychiatry, 66, 222-233.
13. Strassberg, M., Peters K., Marazita, M., Ganger, J., Watt-Morse, M., Murrelle, L., Tarter, R., & Vanyukov, M. (2002). Pittsburgh Registry of Infant Multiples (PRIM). Twin Research, 5, 499-501.
14. Waldrop M., & Halverson, C. (1971). Minor physical anomalies and hyperactive behavior in children. In J. Hellmuth (Ed.), Exceptional Infant: Studies in abnormalities (Vol. 2). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
15. Windle, M., & Lerner, R. (1986) Reassessing the dimensions of temperamental individuality across the life span: The Revised Dimensions of Temperament Survey (DOTS-R). Journal of Adolescent Research, 1, 213-230.