Validation of linear scaling semiempirical LocalSCF method

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Volumn 2, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1685-1692

  Anisimov, Victor M ^a   Bugaenko, Vladislav L ^b   Bobrikov, Vladimir V ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF PHARMACY   (United States)

^b Quantum Biochemistry Group   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846187742     PISSN: 15499618     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ct600222t     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Anikin, N. A.; Anisimov, V. M.; Bugaenko, V. L.; Bobrikov, V. V.; Andreyev, A. M. LocalSCF Method for Semiempirical Quantum-Chemical Calculation of Ultralarge Biomolecules. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121 (3), 1266-1270.
2. Bugaenko, V. L.; Bobrikov, V. V.; Andreyev, A. M.; Anikin, N. A.; Anisimov, V. M. LocalSCF2 User Manual; Fujitsu Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan, 2005.
3. Stewart, J. J. P. Application of Localized Molecular Orbitals to the Solution of Semiempirical Self-Consistent Field Equations. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1996, 58 (2), 133-146.
4. Roothaan, C. C. J. New Developments in Molecular Orbital Theory. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1951, 23 (2), 69-89.
5. Hall, G. G. The Molecular Orbital Theory of Chemical Valency VIII: A Method for Calculating lonization Potentials. Proc. R. Soc. London 1951, A205, 541-5552.
6. Lee, T.-S.; York, D. M.; Yang, W. Linear-Scaling Semiempirical Quantum Calculations for Macromolecules. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105 (7), 2744-2750.
7. Dixon, S. L.; Merz, K. M., Jr. Semiempirical Molecular Orbital Calculations with Linear System Size Scaling. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104 (17), 6643-6649.
8. Millam, J. M.; Scuseria, G. E. Linear Scaling Conjugate Gradient Density Matrix Search as an Alternative to Diagonalization for First Principles Electronic Structure Calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 106 (13), 5569-5577.
9. Seijo, L.; Barandiaran, Z. Parallel, Linear-Scaling Building-Block and Embedding Method Based on Localized Orbitals and Orbital-Specific Basis Sets. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121 (14), 6698-6709.
10. Goedecker, S.; Scuseria, G. E. Linear Scaling Electronic Structure Methods in Chemistry and Physics. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2003, 5 (4), 14-21.
11. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28 (1), 235-242.
12. MacKerell, A. D.; Bashford, D.; Bellott, M.; Dunbrack, R. L.; Evanseck, J. D.; Field, M. J.; Fischer, S.; Gao, J.; Guo, H.; Ha, S.; Joseph-McCarthy, D.; Kuchnir, L.; Kuczera, K.; Lau, F. T. K.; Mattos, C.; Michnick, S.; Ngo, T.; Nguyen, D. T.; Prodhom, B.; Reiher, W. E.; Roux, B.; Schlenkrich, M.; Smith, J. C.; Stole, R.; Straub, J.; Watanabe, M.; Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera, J.; Yin, D.; Karplus, M. All-Atom Empirical Potential for Molecular Modeling and Dynamics Studies of Proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102 (18), 3586-3616.
13. Feller, S. E.; Zhang, Y.; Pastor, R. W.; Brooks, B. R. Constant Pressure Molecular Dynamics Simulation: The Langevin Piston Method. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103 (11), 4613-4621.
14. Ryckaert, J.-P.; Ciccotti, G.; Berendsen, H. J. C. Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 1977, 23 (3), 327-341.
15. York, D. M.; Darden, T. A.; Pedersen, L. G. The Effect of Long-Range Electrostatic Interactions in Simulations of Macromolecular Crystals: A Comparison of the Ewald and Truncated List Methods. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99 (10), 8345-8388.
16. Greengard, L. The Rapid Evaluation of Potential Fields in Particle Systems; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1988.
17. White, C. A.; Head-Gordon, M. Derivation and Efficient Implementation of the Fast Multipole Method. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101 (8), 6593-6605.
18. Dewar, M. J. S.; Thiel, W. Ground States of Molecules. 38. The MNDO Method. Approximations and Parameters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99 (15), 4899-4907.
19. Dewar, M. J. S.; Zoebisch, E. G.; Healy, E. F.; Stewart, J. J. P. Development and Use of Quantum Mechanical Molecular Models. 76. AMI: A New General Purpose Quantum Mechanical Molecular Model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107 (13), 3902-3909.
20. Stewart, J. J. P. Optimization of Parameters for Semiempirical Methods I. Method. J. Comput. Chem. 1989, 10 (2), 209-220.
21. Stewart, J. J. P. MOPAC2002, release 2.1; Fujitsu Limited: Tokyo, Japan, 2002.
22. Anisimov, V. M.; Anikin, N.; Bugaenko, V.; Bobrikov, V.; Andreyev, A. Accuracy Assessment of Semiempirical Molecular Electrostatic Potential of Proteins. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2003, 109 (4), 213-219.
23. Giese, T. J.; Sherer, E. C.; Cramer, C. J.; York, D. M. A Semiempirical Quantum Model for Hydrogen-Bonded Nucleic Acid Base Pairs. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2005, 1 (6), 1275-1285.
24. Villar, R.; Gil, M. J.; García, J. I.; Martínez-Merino, V. Are AMI Ligand-Protein Binding Enthalpies Good Enough for Use in the Rational Design of New Drugs? J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26 (13), 1347-1358.
25. Metzger, T. G.; Ferguson, D. M.; Glauser, W. A. A Computational Analysis of Interaction Energies in Methane and Neopentane Dimer Systems. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 18 (1), 70-79.
26. Vasilyev, V.; Bliznyuk, A. Application of Semiempirical Quantum Chemical Methods as a Scoring Function in Docking. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2004, 112 (4), 313-317.