Regional trading arrangements for chile: do the results differ with a dynamic model?

Economie Internationale

Volumn 94-95, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 261-281

  Rutherford, Thomas F ^a   Tarr, David G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b WORLD BANK   (United States)

Author keywords

Computable and other applied general equilibrium models; Computable general equilibrium models; Economic integration; Trade forecasting and simulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846181764     PISSN: 12408095     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Athukorala, P., Reidel, J., 1994. A demand and supply factors in the determination of NIE exports: a simultaneous error-correction model for Hong Kong: a comment, Economic Journal 104, November, 1411-1414.
2. Baldwin, R.E., 1992. Measurable dynamic gains from trade, Journal of Political Economy 100(1), 162-174.
3. Baldwin, R.E., Rikard, F., Haaland, J., 1999. Investment creation and investment diversion: simulation analysis of the Single Market programme, in Baldwin, R., Francois, J., (Eds), Dynamic Issues in Applied Commercial Policy Analysis.
4. Bhagwati, J., Arvind, P., 1996. Preferential trading areas and multilateralism: strangers, friends or foes?, in Bhagwati, J., Panagariya, A. (Eds), The Economics of Preferential Trading Arrangements, Washington, DC: The American Enterprise Institute Press.
5. Dantzig, G., Manne, A., 1974. A complementary algorithm for an optimal capital path with invariant proportions, Journal of Economic Theory 9, 312-323.
6. Francois, J., McDonald, B., Nordstom, H., 1994. The Uruguay Round: a global general equilibrium assessment, Geneva: GATT Secretariat, mimeo.
7. Francois, J., McDonald, B., Nordstom, H., 1996. Assessing the Uruguay Round, in Martin, W., Winters, L.A. (Eds), The Uruguay Round and the developing countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Hansen, T., Koopmans, T., 1972. On the definition and the computation of a capital stock invariant under optimization, Journal of Economic Theory 5, 487-523.
9. Harrison, G.W., Rutherford, T.F., Tarr, D.G., 1996. Increased competition and completion of the market in the European Community, The Journal of Economic Integration 11(3), 332-365.
10. Harrison, G.W., Rutherford, T.F., Tarr, D.G., 1997a. Quantifying the Uruguay Round, Economic Journal 107 (444), 1405-1430.
11. Harrison, G.W., Rutherford, T.F., Tarr, D.G., 1997b. Economic implications for Turkey of a customs union with the European Union, European Economic Review 41(3-5), 861-870.
12. Harrison, G.W., Rutherford, T.F., Tarr, DG., 2002. Trade policy options for Chile: the importance of market access, World Bank Economic Review 16(1), 49-79.
13. Hertel, T., (Ed), 1997. Global Trade Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Lucas, R.E., 1967. Optimal investment policy and the flexible accelerator, International Economic Review 8(1), 78-85.
15. McKibbon, W.J., Wilkoxin, P., 1995. The global costs of policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, Final Report on US Environmental Protection Agency Cooperative Agreement CR818579-01-0 Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
16. de Melo, J., Tarr, D., 1992. A general equilibrium analysis of US foreign trade policy, Cambridge MA.: MIT Press.
17. de Melo, J., Panagariya, A., 1993. New dimensions in regional integration, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Mercenier, J., Michel, P., 1994. Discrete time finite horizon approximation of optimal growth with steady-state invariance, Econometrica 62(3), May, 635-656.
19. Mercenier, J., Michel, P., 1995. Temporal aggregation in a multi-sector economy with endogenous growth, Working Paper 554, Minneapolis: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
20. Reidel, J., 1988. The demand for LDC exports of manufactures: estimates from Hong Kong, Economic Journal 98, March, 138-148.
21. Rutherford, T.F., Tarr, D.G., 2002. Trade liberalization and endogenous growth in a small open economy, Journal of International Economics 56(2), 247-272.
22. Shatz, H., Tarr, D.G., 2001. Exchange rate overvaluation and trade protection: lessons from experience, in Drabek, Z. (Ed), Globalization Under Threat: The Stability of Trade Policy and Multilateral Agreements, Edgar Elgar: Cheltenham, UK.
23. Schiff, M., 2002. Chile's trade and regional integration policy, World Economy 25(7), 973-990.
24. Thomas, V., Nash, J., and Associates, 1991. Best Practices in Trade Policy Reform, Oxford: Oxford University Press for the World Bank.
25. Treadway, A., 1969. On rational entrepreneurial behavior and the demand for investment, Review of Economic Studies 3(2), 628-652.
26. Uzawa, H., 1969. Time preference and the penrose effect in a two class model of economic growth, Journal of Political Economy 77, 628-652.
27. Valdes, A., 1996. Surveillance of agricultural price and trade policy in Latin America during major policy reforms, World Bank Discussion paper 349, Washington, DC.
28. World Bank, 1987. The World Development Report, Oxford University Press for the World Bank.