Empirical models of formative augmenting in accordance with the relations of same, opposite, more-than and less-than;Modelos empíricos de augmenting formativo de acuerdo a las relaciones de igualdad, oposiciín, mayor-que y menor que

International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 285-302

  Whelan, Robert ^a   Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Derived consequential stimuli; Establishing operations; Formative augmenting; Motivation; RFT

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846167903     PISSN: 15777057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayes, S.C., Dymond, S., & O'Hora, D. (2001). Multiple stimulus relations and the transformation of stimulus functions. In S.C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Reno, NV: Context Press.
2. Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayes, S.C., & Gregg, J. (2001). Religion, Spirituality, and Transcendence. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Reno, NV: Context Press.
3. Barnes-Holmes, D., O'Hora, D., Roche, B., Hayes, S.C., Bisset, T., & Lyddy, F. (2001). Understanding and verbal regulation. In S.C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Reno, NV: Context Press.
4. Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., Healy, O., Lyddy, F., Cullinan, V.A., & Hayes, S.C. (2001). Psychological Development. In S.C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Reno, NV: Context Press.
5. Cohen, J.D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). Psyscope: a new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral research methods, instruments and computers, 25, 257-271.
6. Dymond, S. & Barnes, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163-184.
7. Dymond, S. & Barnes, D. (1996). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness and opposition. ThePsychological Record, 46, 271-300.
8. Green, G., Stromer, R., & Mackay, H.A. (1993). Relational learning in stimulus sequences. The Psychological Record, 43, 599-615.
9. Hayes, S.C., Kohlenberg, B.S., & Hayes, L. J. (1991). The transfer of specific and general consequential functions through simple and conditional equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 119-137.
10. Hayes, S.C., & Wilson, K.G. (1993). Some applied implications of a contemporary behavior-analytic account of verbal events. Behavior Analyst, 16, 283-301.
11. O'Hora, D., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P.M. (2002). Response latencies to multiple derived stimulus relations: Testing two predictions of relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 52, 51-75.
12. Roche, B. & Barnes, D. (1996). Arbitrarily applicable relational responding and sexual categorization: A critical test of the derived difference relation. The Psychological Record, 46, 451-475.
13. Roche, B. & Barnes, D. (1997). A transformation of respondently conditioned stimulus function in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 275-301.
14. Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, D., Smeets, P.M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & McGready, S. (2000). Contextual control over the derived transformation of discriminative and sexual arousal functions. The Psychological Record, 50, 267-291.
15. Roche, B., Stewart, I., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (1999). Psyscope: an easy-to-use graphical system for designing and controlling equivalence experiments. The Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 21, 37-52.
16. Sidman, M. (1992). Equivalence: Some basic considerations. In S.C. Hayes & L.J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 15-27). Reno, NV: Context Press.
17. Sidman, M. (1997). Equivalence: A theoretical or descriptive model? Revista Mexicana de Analisis de al Conducta, 23, 125-145.
18. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
19. Steele, D.L. & Hayes, S.C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrary applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519-555.
20. Whelan, R. (2002). Derived stimulus relations under contextual control produce association and mediated priming. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 20, 22-23.