Central venous catheter placement by an interventional radiology unit: An Australian experience

Australasian Radiology

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 35-41

  Lee, M K S ^a   Mossop, P J ^a   Vrazas, J I ^a  

^a ST VINCENT S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Central venous catheter; Complication; Interventional radiology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BLEEDING; CATHETER INFECTION; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; CHEMOTHERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMATOMA; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PNEUMOTHORAX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEPSIS; SUBCLAVIAN VEIN CATHETER; VASCULAR ACCESS; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUSTRALIA; CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33846165478     PISSN: 00048461     EISSN: 14401673     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2006.01656.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australian hospital statistics 2003-04. AIHW (Health Services Series no. 23), Canberra, 2005. AIHW Catalogue No.: HSE 37.
2. Lewis CA, Allen TE, Burke DR et al. Quality improvement guidelines for central venous access. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: S231-5.
3. Adam A. Insertion of long term central venous catheters: time for a new look. BMJ 1995; 311: 341-2.
4. Noh HM, Kaufman JA, Rhea JT, Kim SY, Geller SC, Waltman AC. Cost comparison of radiologic versus surgical placement of long-term hemodialysis catheters. AJR 1999; 172: 673-5.
5. David SJ, Thompson JS, Edney JA. Insertion of Hickman catheters in total parenteral nutrition: a prospective study of 200 consecutive patients. Am Surg 1984; 50: 673-6.
6. Basford TJ, Poenaru D, Silva M. Comparison of delayed complications of central venous catheters placed surgically or radiologically in pediatric oncology patients. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38: 788-92.
7. Miller AH, Roth BA, Mills TJ, Woody JR, Longmoor CE, Foster B. Ultrasound guidance versus the landmark technique for the placement of central venous catheters in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2002; 9: 800-805.
8. Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams RG et al. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ 2003; 327: 361.
9. Mansfield PF, Hohn DC, Fornage BD, Gregurich MA, Ota DM. Complications and failures of subclavian vein catheterization. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1735-8.
10. Calvert N, Hind D, McWilliams RG, Thomas SM, Beverley C, Davidson A. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound locating devices for central venous access: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2003; 7: 1-84.
11. Tseng M, Sadler D, Wong J et al. Radiologic placement of central venous catheters: rates of success and immediate complications in 3412 cases. Can Assoc Radiol J 2001; 52: 379-84.
12. McBride KD, Fisher R, Warnock N et al. A comparative analysis of radiological and surgical placement of central venous catheters. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1997; 20: 17-22.
13. Kincaid EH, Davis PW, Chang MC et al. "Blind" placement of long-term central venous access devices: report of 589 consecutive procedures. Am Surg 1999; 65: 520-23; discussion 523-4.
14. Silberzweig JE, Sacks D, Khorsandi AS. Reporting standards for central venous access. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: S443-52.
15. Cajozzo M, Quintini G, Cocchiera G. Comparison of central venous catheterization with and without ultrasound guide. Transfus Apher Sci 2004; 31: 199-202.
16. Mey U, Glasmacher A, Hahn C et al. Evaluation of an ultrasound-guided technique for central venous access via the internal jugular vein in 493 patients. Support Care Cancer 2003; 11: 148-55. Epub 2002 Oct 23.
17. Chan LL, Tan BS, Kaw GJ et al. Radiological placement of 211 central venous catheters: outcome and complications. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1999; 28: 481-7.
18. Pracchia LF, Dias LCS, Dorlhiac-Llacer PE, Chamone A. Comparison of catheter-related infection risk in two different long-term venous devices in adult hematology-oncology patients. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 2004; 59: 291-5.