Interactive technologies and videotapes for patient education in cancer care: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

Supportive Care in Cancer

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 7-20

  Gysels, Marjolein ^a,b   Higginson, Irene J ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cancer; Decision making; Interactive technologies; Patient education; Videotapes

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; AUTOMATION; CALCULATION; CANCER PATIENT; CINAHL; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE; KNOWLEDGE BASE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; NORTH AMERICA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; RISK; STANDARDIZATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM; VIDEOTAPE;

COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 33846149637     PISSN: 09414355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-006-0112-z     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Ader DH, Seibring AR, Bhaskar P, Melamed BG (1992) Information seeking and interactive videodisc preparation for third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:27-31
2. Agre P, Kurtz R, Krauss B (1994) A randomised trial using videotape to present consent information for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 40(3):271-276
3. Bartlett EE, Grayson M, Barker R (1984) The effects of physician communication skills on patient satisfaction, recall and adherence. J Chronic Dis 37:765-772
4. Brown RF, Butow PN, Sharrock MA, Henman M, Boyle F, Goldstein D et al (2004) Education and role modelling for clinical decisions with female cancer patients. Health Expect 7(4):303-316
5. Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V (1980) Informed consent - why are its goals imperfectly realised? Ann Intern Med 92:832-836
6. Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D (1999) Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough? Br Med J 318:318-322
7. Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire GP, Baum M (1990) Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial. Br Med J 301:575-580
8. Gustafson DH, Hawkins R, Pingree S, McTavish F, Arora NK, Mendenhall J et al (2001) Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer. J Gen Intern Med 16(435):445
9. Hughes KK (1993) Decision making by patients with breast cancer: the role of information in treatment selection. Oncol Nurs Forum 20:623-628
10. Jones R, Pearson J, McGregor J (1999) Cross-sectional survey of patients satisfaction with information about cancer. Br Med J 319:1247-1248
11. Jones R, Pearson J, McGregor S, Cawsey J, Barrett A, Craig N et al (1999) Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for cancer patients. Br Med J 319:1241-1247
12. Maslin AM, Baum M, Walker JS, A'Hearn R, Prouse A (1998) Using an interactive video disk in breast cancer patient support. Nurs Times 94(44):52-55
13. Meredith C, Symonds P, Webster L (1996) Information needs of cancer patients in the west of Scotland: cross-sectional survey of patients' views. Br Med J 313:724-726
14. Mills ME, Sullivan K (1999) The importance of information giving for patients newly diagnosed with cancer: a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs 8:631-642
15. Molenaar S, Sprangers MA, Postma-Schuit FC (2000) Feasibility and effects of decision aids. Med Decis Making 20:112-127
16. Morris J, Ingham R (1988) Choice of surgery for early breast cancer: psychosocial considerations. Soc Sci Med 27:1257-1262
17. National Cancer Alliance (1996) Patient-centred cancer services? What patients say. National Cancer Alliance, Oxford
18. O'Connor A, Fiset V, DeGrasse C, Graham I, Evans W, Stacey D et al (1999) Decision aids for patients considering options affecting cancer outcomes: evidence of efficacy and policy implications. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 25:67-80
19. O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, Tetroe J, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H et al (1999) Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. Br Med J 319:731-734
20. Rinck G, Van den Bos G, Kleijnen J, de Haes H, Schade E, Veenhof C (1997) Methodologic issues in effectiveness research on palliative cancer care: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol 15(4):1697-1707
21. Russell I, Di Blasi Z, Lambert M, Russell D (1998) Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: opportunities and threats. In: Templeton AA, O'Brien PMS (eds) Evidence-based fertility treatment. RCOG, London
22. Shaw M, Beebe T, Tomshine P, Adlis S, Oliver W (2001) A randomized controlled trial of interactive, multimedia software for patient colonoscopy education. J Clin Gastroenterol 32(2):142-147
23. Slavin RE (1995) Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to metaanalysis. J Clin Epidemiol 48:9-18
24. Steward MA (1995) Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J 152:1423-1433
25. Street RL, Voight B, Geyer C, Manning T, Swanson GP (1995) Increasing patient involvement in choosing treatment for early breast cancer. Cancer 76(11):2275-2285
26. Thomas R, Daly M, Perryman B, Stockton D (2000) Forewarned is forearmed - benefits of preparatory information on videocassette for patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy - a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 36:1536-1543
27. Whelan T, Sawka C, Levine M, Gafni A, Reyno L, Willan A et al (2003) Helping patients make informed choices: a randomised trial of a decision aid for adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(8):581-587
28. World Health Organisation/UICC (2003) Global action against cancer. World Health Organisation/UICC, Geneva