Current results of balloon aortic valvuloplasty in high-risk patients

Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-5

  Shareghi, Shahrzad ^a,b   Rasouli, Leila ^a,b   Shavelle, David M ^a,b   Burstein, Steven ^a,b   Matthews, Ray V ^a  

^a GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HEMODYNAMICS; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; REOPERATION; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL TIME; TRANSLUMINAL VALVULOPLASTY; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR DISEASE;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BALLOON DILATATION; CALCINOSIS; COHORT STUDIES; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX FACTORS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33846144407     PISSN: 10423931     EISSN: 15572501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Feldman T, Glagov S, Carroll JD. Restenosis following successful balloon valvuloplasty: Bone formation in aortic valve leaflets. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993;29:1-7.
2. Safian RD, Berman AD, Diver DJ, et al. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in 170 consecutive patients. N Engl J Med 1988;319:125-130.
3. Otto CM, Mickel MC, Kennedy JW, et al. Three-year outcome after balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Insights into prognosis of valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 1994;89:642-650.
4. Feldman T. Percutaneous valve repair and replacement: challenges encountered, challenges met, challenges ahead. Circulation 2006;113:771-773.
5. Munt B, Webb JG. Percutaneous valve repair and replacement techniques. Heart 2006;92:1369-1372.
6. Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:9-13.
7. ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2006;114:450-527.
8. Kolh P, Kerzmann A, Lahaye L, et al. Cardiac surgery in octogenarians: Peri-operative outcome and long-term results. Eur Heart J 2001;22:1235-1243.
9. NHLBI Registry. Percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Acute and 30-day follow-up results in 674 patients from the NHLBI Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry. Circulation 1991;84:2383-2397.
10. McKay RG. The Mansfield Scientific Aortic Valvuloplasty Registry: Overview of acute hemodynamic results and procedural complications. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:485-491.
11. Lieberman EB, Bashore TM, Hermiller JB, et al. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in adults: Failure of procedure to improve long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:1522-1528.
12. Aggarwal A, Kini AS, Attanti S, et al. Results of repeat balloon valvuloplasty for treatment of aortic stenosis in patients aged 59 to 104 years. Am J Cardiol 2005;1;95:43-47.
13. Klein A, Lee K, Gera A, et al. Long-term mortality, cause of death, and temporal trends in complications after percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty for calcific aortic stenosis. J Interv Cardiol 2006;19:269-275.
14. Roques F, Nashef SA, Michel P, et al. Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: Analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19,030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:816-822.
15. Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Tron C, et al. Treatment of calcific aortic stenosis with the percutaneous heart valve: Mid-term follow-up from the initial feasibility studies: The French experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1214-1223.
16. Webb JG, Chandavimol M, Thompson CR, et al. Percutaneous aortic valve implantation retrograde from the femoral artery. Circulation 2006;14;113:842-850.
17. Marchant D, Schwartz R, Chepurko L, Katz S. Access site management after aortic valvuloplasty using a suture mediated closure device: Clinical experience in 4 cases. J Invasive Cardiol 2000;12:474-477.
18. Solomon LW, Fusman B, Jolly N, et al. Percutaneous suture closure for management of large French size arterial puncture in aortic valvuloplasty. J Invasive Cardiol 2001;13:592-596.
19. Sakata Y, Syed Z, Salinger MH, Feldman T. Percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty: Antegrade transseptal vs. conventional retrograde transarterial approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;64:314-321.
20. Bouma BJ, van den Brink RB, van der Meulen JH, et al. To operate or not on elderly patients with aortic stenosis: The decision and its consequences. Heart 1999;82:143-148.
21. Iung B, Cachier A, Baron G, et al. Decision-making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: Why are so many denied surgery? Eur Heart J 2005;26:2714-2720.
22. Bouma BJ, van den Brink RB, Zwinderman K, et al. Which elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis benefit from surgical treatment? An aid to clinical decision making. J Heart Valve Dis 2004;13:374-381.