Welfare to what? after workfare in Toronto

International Social Security Review

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 95-106

  Lightman, Ernie ^a   Mitchell, Andrew ^a   Herd, Dean ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846143968     PISSN: 0020871X     EISSN: 1468246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-246X.2005.00227.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Brauner, S.; Loprest, P. 1999. Where are they now? What states’ studies of people who left welfare tell us (series “New federalism: Issues and options for states”, No. A-32, May). Washington, DC, Urban Institute.
2. Brenner, N.; Theodore, N. 2002. “Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’”, in Antipode, Vol. 34, No. 3.
3. Campbell, N.; Maniha, J. K.; Rolston, H. 2002. Job retention and advance mentin welfare reform (WR&B Brief No. 18, March). Washington, DC, Brookings Institution.
4. City of Ottawa. 2002. Job retention services evaluation report (May). Ottawa, Office of Workforce Development, Innovation, Development and Partnerships Branch, People Services.
5. City of Toronto. 2002. After Ontario Works: A survey of people who left Ontario Works in Toronto in 2001 (May). Toronto, Community and Neighbourhood Services.
6. Cranford, C.; Vosko, L. F.; Zukewich, N. 2003. “Precarious employment in the Canadian labour market: A statistical portrait”, in Just Labour, Vol. 3 (fall).
7. Daguerre, A. 2004. “Importing workfare: Policy transfer of social and labour market policies from the USA to Britain under New Labour”, in Social Policy and Administration, Vol. 38, No. 1.
8. Economic Council of Canada. 1990. Good jobs, bad jobs: Employment in the service economy — A statement by the Economic Council of Canada. Ottawa.
9. Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, Polity Press.
10. Ford, R.; Gyarmati, D.; Foley, K.; Tattrie, D.; Jimenez, L. 2003. Can work incentives pay for themselves? (Final report on the self-sufficiency project for welfare applicants). Ottawa, Social Demonstration Research Corporation.
11. Fraser, J.; Wilkey, C.; Frenschkowski, J.-A. 2003. Denial by design: Ontario disability support program. Toronto, Income Security Advocacy Centre.
12. Frenette, M.; Picot, G. 2003. Life after welfare: The economic well being of welfare leavers in Canada during the 1990s (Research Paper Series, No. 192, March). Ottawa, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
13. Friedlander, D.; Burtless, G. 1995. Five years after: The long-term effects of welfare-to-work programs. New York, NY, Russel Sage Foundation.
14. Friedlander, D.; Riccio, J.; Freedman, S. 1993. Benefits, costs, and three-year impacts of a welfare-to-work program. New York, NY, Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
15. Gal, J. 2004. Personal communication, 5 March.
16. Gorlick, C.; Brethour, G. 2002. Welfare to work programs in Canada: Policy intentions and program realities. London, Ontario, University of Western Ontario.
17. Gray, D. 2003. National versus regional financing and management of unemployment and related benefits: The case of Canada (OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 14). Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
18. Hamilton, G. 2002. Moving people from welfare to work: Lessons from the national evaluation of welfare-to-work strategies (July). New York, NY, Man power Demonstration Research Corporation.
19. Heisz, A.; Jackson, A.; Picot, G. 2002. Winners and losers in the labour market of the 1990s (Analytical Studies Branch, Research Paper Series, No. 184, Catalogue No. 11F0019). Ottawa, Statistics Canada.
20. Herd, D.; Mitchell, A.; Lightman, E. 2005. “Rituals of degradation: Administration as policy in the Ontario Works program”, in Social Policy and Administration, Vol. 39, No. 1.
21. HRDC. 2000. Reconnecting social assistance recipients to the labour market (HRDC Report No. SPAH123E–03–00). Ottawa, Human Resources Development Canada, Strategic Policy Division, Evaluation and Data Development Branch.
22. Jackson, A. 2003. “Good jobs in good workplaces”: Reflections on medium-term labour market challenges (July). Ottawa, Caledon Institute of Social Policy.
23. Lichter, D. T.; Jayakody, R. 2002. “Welfare reform: How do we measure success?”, in Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 28.
24. Lightman, E. 2003. Social policy in Canada. Toronto, Oxford University Press.
25. Moffitt, R. A. 2002. From welfare to work: What the evidence shows (WR&B Brief No. 13, January). Washington, DC, Brookings Institution. Also available at http://www.brookings.edu/dybdocroot/wrb/publications/pb/pb13.htm (visited on 23 May 2005).
26. OECD. 2003. Employment outlook 2003. Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
27. Ontario, Ministry of Community and Social Services. 1998. Survey of individuals who left social assistance (April). Toronto, Ekos Research Associates.
28. Ontario, Ministry of Community and Social Services. 1999a. Ontario Works policy directive 2.0. Toronto.
29. Ontario, Ministry of Community and Social Services. 1999b. Ontario Works policy directive 37.0. Toronto.
30. Ontario Progressive Conservative Party. 1994. The commonsense revolution (May). Toronto.
31. Peck, J. 1999. “Workfare in the sun: Politics, representation and method in US welfare-to-work strategies”, in Political Geography, Vol. 17, No. 5.
32. Peck, J. 2001. Workfare states. New York, NY, Guilford Press.
33. Peck, J.; Theodore, N. 2000. “‘Work first’: Workfare and the regulation of contingent labour markets”, in Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 24, No. 1.
34. Saunders, R. 2003. Defining vulner ability in the labour market (October). Ottawa, Canadian Policy Research Net works.
35. Scott, E. K.; Edin, K.; London, A. S.; Kissane, R. J. 2004. “Unstable work, unstable income: Implications for family well-being in the era of time-limited welfare”, in Journal of Poverty, Vol. 8, No. 1.
36. Statistics Canada (annual). Labour Force Historical Review (Catalogue No. 71F0004-XCB). Ottawa.
37. Statistics Canada. 2003. Income of Canadian families (Catalogue No. 96F0030XIE-2001014). Ottawa.
38. Zyblock, M. 1996. Individual earnings inequality and polarization: An exploration into population sub-group trends in Canada, 1981–1993 (Working paper No. W–96–8E). Ottawa, Human Resources Development Canada, Applied Research Branch.