Increasing the transparency of stated choice studies for policy analysis: Designing experiments to produce raw response graphs

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 189-199

  Sur, Dipika ^a   Cook, Joseph ^b   Chatterjee, Susmita ^c   Deen, Jacqueline ^d   Whittington, Dole ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHOLERA AND ENTERIC DISEASES   (India)

^b IL   (United States)

^c Indian Institute of Bio Social Research and Development   (India)

^d International Vaccine Institute   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846132889     PISSN: 02768739     EISSN: 15206688     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pam.20237     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Adamowicz, W. L. (2004). What's it worth? An examination of historical trends and future directions in environmental valuations. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 48(3), 419-443.
2. Alpizar, F., & Carlsson, F. (2003). Policy implications and analysis of the determinants of travel mode choice: An application of choice experiments to metropolitan Costa Rica. Environment and Development Economics, 8, 603-619.
3. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P. R., Leamer, E. E., Radner, R., & Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the NOAA Panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register, 58, 4601-4614.
4. Carlsson, F., & Martinsson, P. (2001). Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41, 179-192.
5. Cook, J., Whittington, D., Canh, D. G., Johnson, F. R., & Nyamete, A. (forthcoming). Reliability of stated preferences for cholera and typhoid vaccines with time to think in Hue, Vietnam. Economic Inquiry.
6. DeShazo, J. R., & Fermo, G. (2002). Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: The effects of complexity on choice consistency. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44, 123-143.
7. Diamond, P., & Hausman, J. (1994). Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 45-64.
8. Hanemann, W. M. (1994). Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 19-43.
9. Johnson, F. R., Mathews, K. E., & Bingham, M. F. (2000). Evaluating welfare-theoretic consistency in multiple-response, stated-preference surveys. TER Technical Working Paper No. T-0003, Triangle Economic Research, Durham, NC.
10. Portney, P. (1994). The contingent valuation debate: Why economists should care. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 3-17.
11. Swait, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2001). The influence of task complexity on consumer choice: A latent class model of decision strategy switching. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 135-148.
12. Train, K., & Sonnier, G. (2005). Mixed logit with bounded distributions of partworths. In R. Scarpa & A. Alberini (Eds.), Applications of simulation methods in environmental resource economics (pp. 117-134). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.