Decision method for vendor selection based on AHP/PROMETHEE/GAIA

Dalian Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Dalian University of Technology

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 926-931

  Wang, Jian Jun ^a   Wei, Cai Min ^b   Yang, Deli ^a  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b SHANTOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Geometrical analysis for interactive assistance; Preference ranking organization methods for enrichment evaluation; Vendor selection

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; EVALUATION; GEOMETRY; NUMERICAL METHODS; SELECTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; ENRICHMENT EVALUATION; GEOMETRICAL ANALYSIS; INTERACTIVE ASSISTANCE; PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION; VENDOR SELECTION;

MARKETING;

EID: 33846131607     PISSN: 10008608     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BOER L, DE LABRO E, MORLACCHI P. A review of methods supporting supplier selection[J]. Eur J Purchasing Supply Manage, 2001, 7(2): 75-89.
2. ZELENY M. Multiple Criteria Decision Making[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1982.
3. MACHARIS C, SPRINGAEL J, DE B K, et al. PROMETHEE and AHP: the design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis: strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP[J]. Eur J Oper Res, 2004, 153(2): 307-317.
4. TAM C Y, TUMMALA V M. An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system[J]. Omega, 2001, 29(2): 171-182.
5. HANDFIELD R B, WALTON S V, SROUFE R, et al. Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the analytical hierarchy process[J]. J Oper Res, 2002, 141(1): 70-87.
6. INDRANI B. On the use of information criteria in analytic hierarchy process[J]. J Oper Res, 2002, 141(1): 200-216.
7. GREGORY R E. Source selection: a matrix approach[J]. J Purchasing Mater Manage, 1986, 22(2): 24-29.
8. TIMMERMAN E. An approach to vendor performance evaluation[J]. J Purchasing Mater Manage, 1986, 22(4): 2-8.
9. DE B L, WEGEN L V, TELGEN J. Outranking methods in support of supplier selection[J]. J Purchasing Supply Manage, 1998, 4(2): 109-118.
10. WEBER C A, DESAI A. Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: a negotiation tool for buyers[J]. Eur J Oper Res, 1996, 90(1): 142-155.
11. DULMIN R, MININNO V. Supplier selection using a multi-criteria decision aid method[J]. J Purchasing Supply Manage, 2003, 9(4): 177-187.
12. GHODSYPOUR S H, BRIEN C O. The total cost of logistics in supplier selection under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint[J]. Int J Prod Econ, 2001, 73(1): 15-27.
13. WEBE C A, CURRENT J R, DESAI A. Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection[J]. Eur J Oper Res, 1998, 108(1): 208-223.
14. SAATY T L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M]. New York: McGraw Hill, 1988.
15. BRANS J P, VINCKE P. A preference ranking organization method[J]. Manage Sci, 1985, 31(6): 647-656.
16. BRANS J P, VINCKE P, MARECHAL B. How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method[J]. Eur J Oper Res, 1986, 24(2): 228-238.
17. BRANS J P, MARECHAL B. The PROMCALC and GAIA decision support system for multicriteria decision aid[J]. Decis Support Syst, 1994, 12(4/5): 297-310.