C4d: A Marker for Hepatic Transplant Rejection

Transplantation Proceedings

Volumn 38, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 2333-2334

  Lorho, R ^a   Turlin, B ^a   Aqodad, N ^a   Triki, N ^a   de Lajarte Thirouard, A S ^a   Camus, C ^a   Lakehal, M ^a   Compagnon, P ^a   Dupont Bierre, E ^a   Meunier, B ^a   Boudjema, K ^a   Messner, M ^a  

^a PONTCHAILLOU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; COMPLEMENT COMPONENT C4D;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEPATITIS C; HEPATITIS C VIRUS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HUMORAL IMMUNITY; LIVER BIOPSY; LIVER GRAFT REJECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ACUTE DISEASE; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BIOPSY; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPLEMENT C4B; GRAFT REJECTION; HEPATITIS C; HUMANS; LIVER CIRRHOSIS; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS;

EID: 33846115622     PISSN: 00411345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.06.120     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Maluf D.G., Stravitz R.T., and Cotterell A.H. Adult living donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation: a 6-year single center experience. Am J Transplant 5 (2005) 149
2. Pageaux G.P., Calmus Y., and Boillot O. Steroid withdrawal at day 14 after liver transplantation: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Liver Transpl 10 (2004) 1454
3. Regev A., Molina E., and Moura R. Reliability of histopathologic assessment for the differentiation of recurrent hepatitis C from acute rejection after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 10 (2004) 1233
4. Schmeding M., Neumann U., Dankof A., et al. C4d as a marker for acute rejection following liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 5 suppl 11 (2005) 391
5. Dankof A., Schmeding M., and Morawietz L. Portal capillary C4d deposits and increased infiltration by macrophages indicate humorally mediated mechanisms in acute cellular liver allograft rejection. Virchows Arch 447 (2005) 87
6. Feucht H.E. Significance of donor-specific antibodies in acute rejection. Transplant Proc 37 (2005) 3693