The effects of comprehensive school reform models in reading for Urban middle school students with disabilities

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 322-328

  Shippen, Margaret E ^a,b   Houchins, David E ^c   Calhoon, Mary Beth ^c   Furlow, Carolyn F ^c   Sartor, Donya L ^d  

^a Department of Rehabilitation ^*  (United States)

^b AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Clayton County Schools   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846107370     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/07419325060270060101     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adams, G., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on direct instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.
2. American Institutes for Research. (1999). An educator's guide to schoolwide reform. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
3. Arroyo, A. A., & Rhoad, R. (1999). Meeting diverse needs in urban schools: Research-based recommendations for school personnel. Preventing School Failure, 43, 145-158.
4. Berends, M. (2004). In the wake of a nation at risk: New American schools' private sector school reform initiative. Peabody Journal of Education, 79, 130-163.
5. Borman, G. D., Hewes, G. M., Overman, L. T., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73, 125-230.
6. Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., Kame'enui, E. J., & Tarver, S. G. (2004). Direct instruction reading (4th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. DiMarco, M. (1998). Measurement and reform. In W. M. Evers (Ed.), What's gone wrong in American classrooms (pp. 155-164). Stanford, CA: Hoover Press.
8. Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. New York: Irvington.
9. Fletcher, J. M., & Lyon, G. R. (1998). Reading: A research-based approach. In W. M. Evers (Ed.), What's gone wrong in America's classrooms (pp. 49-90). Stanford, CA: Hoover Press.
10. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27-48.
11. Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., & Fuchs, D. (1997). Monitoring basic skills progress (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
12. Glennan, T. K. (1998). New American Schools after six years. Santa Monica. CA: RAND Corp.
13. Hirsch, E. D. (2001, May 2). The latest dismal NAEP scores. Education Week, 20. Retrieved from http://www.educationweek.org/
14. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
15. Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (1998, Sept.-Oct.). America's next achievement test: Closing the Black-White test score gap. American Prospect, 44-53.
16. Kame'enui, E. J., & Carnine, D. W. (1998). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17. Kauffman, J. M. (2002). Education deform: Bright people sometimes say stupid things about education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
18. Kauffman, J. M. (2005, March) Waving to Ray Charles: Missing the meaning of disabilities. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 520-524.
19. Kauffman, J. M., & Hallahan, D. P. (2005). Special education: What it is and why we need it. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20. Lyon, G. R. (2003, Spring). Reading disability: Why do some children have difficulty learning to read? What can be done about it? Perspective, 18-19.
21. Lyon, G. R., & Moats, L. C. (1997). Critical conceptual and methodological considerations in reading intervention research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 578-588.
22. Madden, N. A., Slavin, R. E., Karweit, N. L., Dolan, L. J., & Wasik, B. A. (1993). Success for all: Longitudinal effects of a restructuring program for inner-city elementary schools. Educational Research Journal, 30, 123-148.
23. McLaughlin, M. J., & Thurlow, M. (2003). Educational accountability and students with disabilities: Issues and challenges. Educational Policy, 17, 431-451.
24. National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1998). School poverty and academic performance: NAEP achievement in high-poverty schools-A special evaluation report for the national assessment of Title I. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
25. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 701 et seq.
26. Reid, K. S. (2003). Achievement rising in urban districts, report finds. Education Week, 22(29), 3.
27. Shippen, M. E., Houchins, D. E., & Steventon, C. (2003). Reading assessment and instruction for students at risk. In R. Colarusso & C. O'Rourke (Eds.), Special education for all teachers (3rd ed., pp. 275-311). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
28. Shippen, M. E., Houchins, D. E., Steventon, C., & Sartor, D. L. (2005). A comparison of two direct instruction reading programs for urban middle school students. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 175-182.
29. Slavin, R. E. (1989). The PET and the pendulum. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 752-758.
30. Slavin, R. E. (2004). Built to last: Long-term maintenance of success for all. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 61-66.
31. Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Dolan, L. J., & Wasik, B. A. (1996). Every child, every school: Success for all. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
32. Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Dolan, L. J., Wasik, B. A., Ross, B. A., Smith, L., et al. (1996). Success for all: A summary of research. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1, 41-76.
33. Southern Regional Education Board. (2005). High schools that work. Retrieved September 26, 2005, from http://www.sreb.org/programs/hstw/ background/backgroundindex.asp
34. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of learning to read. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
35. Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Swanson, H., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford Press.
37. Torgesen, J. K. (1997). The prevention and remediation of reading disabilities: Evaluating what we know from research. Journal of Academic Language Therapy, 1(11), 11-47.
38. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Comprehensive school reform program. Retrieved May 31, 2004. from http://www.ed.gov/programs/ compreform/2pager.html
39. Washington, J. A. (2001). Early literacy skills in African-American children: Research considerations. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 213-221.
40. Wiederholt, J. L., & Bryant, B. R. (2001). Gray oral reading tests (4th ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
41. Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.