The decision-making process: Allograft versus autograft

Neurosurgery

Volumn 60, Issue 1 SUPPL., 2007, Pages

  Deutsch, Harel ^a   Haid, Regis ^b   Rodts Jr , Gerald ^c   Mummaneni, Praveen V ^d  

^a RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Atlanta Brain and Spine Care   (United States)

^c EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Allograft; Autograft; Cervical arthrodesis; Cervical spondylosis

Indexed keywords

BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN; POLYETHER DERIVATIVE; RECOMBINANT BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN 2;

ALLOGRAFT; ARTHRODESIS; AUTOGRAFT; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; BONE GRAFT; BONE MATRIX; BONE MINERALIZATION; BONE SWELLING; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CERVICAL SPINE; CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DONOR SITE; DYSPHAGIA; FREEZE DRYING; HEMATOMA; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; ILIAC BONE; MERALGIA PARESTHETICA; NERVE INJURY; OPERATING ROOM; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPINE FUSION; WOUND INFECTION; ALLOTRANSPLANTATION; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; BONE SCREW; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; DECISION MAKING; METHODOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPINE DISEASE;

BONE TRANSPLANTATION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPINAL DISEASES; SPINAL FUSION; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS; TRANSPLANTATION, HOMOLOGOUS;

EID: 33846106793     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000249221.50085.AD     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. An HS, Simpson JM, Glover JM, Stephany J: Comparison between allograft plus demineralized bone matrix versus autograft in anterior cervical fusion: A prospective multicenter study. Spine 20:2211-2216, 1995.
2. Asselmeier MA, Caspari RB, Bottenfield S: A review of allograft processing and sterilization techniques and their role in transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus. Am J Sports Med 21:170-175, 1993.
3. Bailey RW, Bagley CE: Stabilization of the cervical spine by anterior fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 42:565-594, 1960.
4. Baskin DS, Ryan P, Sonntag V, Westmark R, Widmayer MA: A prospective, randomized, controlled cervical fusion study using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 with the CORNERSTONE-SR allograft ring and the ATLANTIS anterior cervical plate. Spine 28:1219-1225, 2003.
5. Bishop RC, Moore KA, Hadley MN: Anterior cervical interbody fusion using autogenic and allogenic bone graft substrate: A prospective comparative analysis. J Neurosurg 85:206-210, 1996.
6. Brown MD, Malinin TI, Davis PB: A roentgenographic evaluation of frozen allografts versus autografts in anterior cervical spine fusions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 119:231-236, 1976.
7. Caspar W, Geisler FH, Pitzen T, Johnson TA: Anterior cervical plate stabilization in one- and two-level degenerative disease: Overtreatment or benefit? J Spinal Disord 11:1-11, 1998.
8. Cloward RB: The anterior approach for the removal of ruptured cervical discs. J Neurosurg 15:602-614, 1958.
9. Cloward RB: Gas-sterilized cadaver bone grafts for spinal fusion operations: A simplified bone bank. Spine 5:4-10, 1980.
10. Enneking WF, Mindell ER: Observations on massive retrieved human allografts. J Bone Joint Surg 73:1123-1140, 1991.
11. Floyd T, Ohnmeiss D: A meta-analysis of autograft versus allograft in anterior cervical fusion. Eur Spine J 9:398-403, 2000.
12. Goldberg VM, Stevenson S: Natural history of autografts and allografts. Clin Orthop 225:7-16, 1987.
13. Gore DR, Sepic SB: Anterior cervical fusion for degenerative or protruded discs: A review of one hundred forty-six patients. Spine 9:667-671, 1984.
14. Hanley EN, Harvell JC, Shapiro DE, Kraus DR: Use of allograft bone in cervical spine surgery. Semin Spine Surg 1:262-270, 1989.
15. Heary RF, Schlenk RP, Sacchieri TA, Barone D, Brotea C: Persistent iliac crest donor site pain: Independent outcome assessment. Neurosurgery 50:510-516, 2002.
16. Kaiser MG, Haid RW Jr, Subach BR, Barnes B, Rodts GE Jr: Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft. Neurosurgery 50:229-236, 2002.
17. Malloy KM, Hilibrand AS: Autograft versus allograft in degenerative cervical disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 394:27-38, 2002.
18. Martin GJ, Haid RW Jr, MacMillan M, Rodts GE Jr, Berkman R: Anterior cervical discectomy with freeze-dried fibula allograft. Spine 24:852-858, 1999.
19. Pelker RR, Friedlaender GE: Biomechanical aspects of bone autografts and allografts. Orthop Clin North Am 18:235-239, 1987.
20. Robinson RA, Smith GW: Anterolateral cervical disc removal and interbody fusion for cervical disc syndrome. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 96:223-224, 1955.
21. Deleted in proof.
22. Tye G, Graham SR, Broaddus W, Young H: Graft subsidence after instrument-assisted anterior cervical fusion. J Neurosurg 97 [Suppl 2]:186-192, 2002.
23. Vaccaro AR, Singh K, Haid R, Kitchel S, Wuisman P, Taylor W, Branch C, Garfin S: The use of bioabsorbable implants in the spine. Spine J 3:227-237, 2003.
24. Wang JC, McDonough PW, Endow KK, Delamarter RB: Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 25:41-45, 2000.
25. Young WF, Rosenwasser RH: An early comparative analysis of the use of fibular allograft versus autologous iliac crest graft for interbody fusion after anterior cervical discectomy. Spine 18:1123-1124, 1993.
26. Zdeblick TA, Ducker TB: The use of freeze-dried allograft bone for anterior cervical fusions. Spine 16:726-729, 1991.
27. Zdeblick TA, Ghanayem AJ, Rapoff AJ, Swain C, Bassett T, Cooke ME, Markel M: Cervical interbody fusion cages: An animal model with and without bone morphogenetic protein. Spine 23:758-765, 1998.