Safety and tolerability of transoral bravo capsule placement after transnasal manometry using a validated conversion factor

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 24-32

  Lacy, Brian E ^a   O'Shana, Tracia ^a   Hynes, Mary ^a   Kelley Jr , Maurice L ^a   Weiss, Julia E ^b   Paquette, Lisa ^a   Rothstein, Richard I ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHLOROTHALONIL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHILD; COST MINIMIZATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DRUG CAPSULE; DRUG SAFETY; DRUG TOLERABILITY; ESOPHAGOSCOPY; ESOPHAGUS MANOMETRY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOWER ESOPHAGUS SPHINCTER; MALE; PH MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK; VALIDATION PROCESS; VOLUNTEER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; ESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING; FEMALE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; NOSE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 33846105950     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00889.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Kahrilas PJ, Quigley EMM. Clinical esophageal pH recording: A technical review for practice guideline development. Gastroenterology 1996;110:1982-96.
2. Jamieson JR, Stein HJ, DeMeester TR, et al. Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: Normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:1102-11.
3. Richter JE, Bradley LA, DeMeester TR, et al. Normal 24-hr ambulatory esophageal pH values. Influence of study center, pH electrode, age, and gender. Dig Dis Sci 1992;37:849-56.
4. Mearin F, Balboa A, Dot J, et al. How standard is a standard day during a standard ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring? Scan J Gastroenterol 1998;33:583-5.
5. Fass R, Hell R, Sampliner RE, et al. Effect of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring on reflux-provoking activities. Dig Dis Sci 1999;44:2263-9.
6. Mones J, Clave P, Mearin F. Esophageal pH monitoring: Are you sure that the electrode is properly placed? Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:975-8.
7. Aksglaede K, Funch-Jensen P, Thommesen P. Intraesophageal pH probemovement during eating and talking. A videoradiographic study. Acta Radiologica 2003;44:131-5.
8. Pandolfino JE. Bravo capsule pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:8-10.
9. Pandolfino JE, Richter JE, Ours T, et al. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:740-9.
10. Wenner J, Johnsson F, Johansson J, et al. Wireless oesophageal pH monitoring: Feasibility, safety and normal values in healthy subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005;40:768-74.
11. Ward EM, Devault KR, Bouras EP, et al. Successful oesophageal pH monitoring with a catheter-free system. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;19:449-54.
12. Prakash C, Clouse RE. Value of extended recording time with wireless pH monitoring in evaluating gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;3:329-34.
13. Pandolfino JE, Schreiner MA, Lee TJ, et al. Comparison of the Bravo wireless and digitrapper catheter-based pH monitoring systems for measuring esophageal acid exposure. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:1466-76.
14. Wong WM, Bautista J, Dekel R, et al. Feasibility and tolerability of transnasal/per-oral placement of the wireless pH capsule vs. traditional 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring - a randomized trial. Aliment Pharm Ther 2005;21:155-63.
15. Ergun GA, Kahrilas PJ. Clinical applications of esophageal manometry and pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:1077-89.
16. O'Shana T, Hynes ML, Rothstein RI. Determination of a conversion factor to permit accurate transoral placement of the Bravo pH capsule following transnasal manometry. Gastroenterology 2004;126:A1381.
17. Lacy BE, O'Shana T, Rothstein RI, et al. Non-endoscopic versus endoscopic placement of the Bravo pH capsule. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:S26.
18. Weusten BLAM, Smouth AJPM. Ambulatory monitoring of esophageal pH and pressure. In: Castell DO, Richter JE, eds. The esophagus, 4th Ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2004:135-50.
19. Kahrilas PJ, Lin S, Chen J, et al. The effect of hiatus hernia on gastro-oesophageal junction pressure. Gut 1999;44:476-82.
20. American Gastroenterological Association. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: Guidelines on the use of esophageal pH recording. Gastroenterology 1996;110:1981.
21. Connor JT. The value of a p-valueless paper. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1638-40.
22. A Gallup survey on heartburn across America. Princeton, NJ: The Gallup Organization, 1988.
23. Locke GR, Talley NJ, Fett SL, et al. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: A population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology 1997;112:1448-56.
24. Wiener GJ, Morgan TM, Copper JB, et al. Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Reproducibility and variability of pH parameters. Dig Dis Sci 1988;33:1127-33.
25. Li Q, Castell JA, Castell DO. Manometric determination of esophageal length. Am J Gastroenterol 1994;89:722-5.