Epiphytic macrolichens of the greater Cincinnati metropolitan area - Part II: Distribution, diversity and urban ecology

Bryologist

Volumn 109, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 516-526

  Washburn, Stephen J ^a,b   Culley, Theresa M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cincinnati; Diversity; Ecology; IAP; Kentucky; Lichens; Ohio; Urban

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846103854     PISSN: 00072745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1639/0007-2745(2006)109[516:EMOTGC]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Asta, J., W. Erhardt, M. Ferretti, F. Fornasier, U. Kirschbaum, P. L. Nimis, O. W. Purvis, S. Pirintsos, C. Scheidegger, C. Van Haluwyn & V. Wirth. 2002. Mapping liehen diversity as an indicator of environmental quality, In P. L. Nimis, C. Scheidegger & P. A. Wolseley (eds.), Monitoring with Lichens - Monitoring Lichens. NATO Science Series, Sub-Series IV, Earth and Environmental Sciences 7: 273-279. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
2. - & F. Rolley. 1999. Biodiversité et bioindication lichénique: qualité de l'air dans l'agglomération Grenobloise. Bulletin de l'Association Internationale Lichénologique de France 3: 121-126.
3. Brodo, I. M. 1966. Lichen growth and cities: a study on Long Island, New York. The Bryologist 69: 427-449.
4. -, S. D. Sharnoff & S. Sharnoff. 2001. Lichens of North America. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
5. Delendick, T. J. 1994. Notes on the lichens of eastern New York City: Kings and Queens counties, Long Island, New York. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 12: 188-193.
6. Flenniken, D. G. 1999. The Macrolichens in West Virginia. Carlisle Printing, Sugar Creek, Ohio.
7. Gries, C. 1996. Lichens as indicators of air pollution. Pages 240-254. In T. H. Nash III (ed.), Lichen Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. HAMILTON COUNTY AUDITOR (2005). County Auditor On-Line. http://64.56.97.9/realestate2/.
9. Holopainen, T. H. 1984. Cellular injuries in epiphytic lichens transplanted to air polluted areas. Nordic Journal of Botany 4: 393-408.
10. LeBlanc, F. & J. De Sloover. 1970. Relation between industrialization and the distribution and growth of epiphytic lichens and mosses in Montreal. Canadian Journal of Botany 48: 1485-1496.
11. - & D. N. Rao. 1973. Evaluation of the pollution and drought hypotheses in relation to lichens and bryophytes in urban environments. The Bryologist 76: 1-19.
12. McCune, B. 1988. Lichen communities along O3 and SO2 gradients in Indianapolis. The Bryologist 91: 223-228.
13. -. 2000. Lichen communities as indicators of forest health. The Bryologist 103: 353-356.
14. - & J. B. Grace. 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, U.S.A.
15. - & M. J. Mefford. 1999. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 4.36 MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, U.S.A.
16. Meininger, C. A., G. W. Uetz & J. A. Snider. 1985. Variation in epiphytic microcommunities (tardigrade-lichen-bryophyte assemblages) of the Cincinnati, Ohio area. Urban Ecology 9: 45-61.
17. OKI. 2004. Traffic Data and Maps. Ohio Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments, Cincinnati, OH. http://www.oki.org/maps/transportation/traffic. html.
18. Scutari, N. C. & N. I. Theinhardt. 2001. Identification of urban lichens in the field: a case study for Buenos Aires City (Argentina). Mycotaxon 80: 427-445.
19. Showman, R. E. & D. G. Flenniken. 2004. The macrolichens of Ohio. Bulletin of the Ohio Biological Survey, New Series 14(3): i-iv, 1-279.
20. Sigal, L. L. & T. H. Nash III. 1983. Lichen communities on conifers in southern California mountains: an ecological survey to oxidant air pollution. Ecology 64: 1343-1354.
21. SPSS. 1998. SYSTAT, Version 9. SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, U.S.A.
22. Stephenson, W. R. & H. G. Merriam. 1975. Some effects of urban impact on the structure of lichen communities on trees in three deciduous woodlot types. Urban Ecology 1: 311-323.
23. UNITED NATIONS. 2003. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2003 Revision Database, http://esa.un.org/unup.
24. U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. 2005. Census 2000 Summary File 1. Washington DC 20233 http://www.census.gov/.
25. Washburn, S. J. 2005. Lichens of the greater Cincinnati metropolitan area-part I: species lists and new county records. Evansia 22: 138-149.
26. Zambrano, A. & T. H. Nash III. 2000. Lichen responses to short-term transplantation in Desierto de los Leones, Mexico City. Environmental Pollution 107: 407-412.
27. Zambrano García, A., T. H. Nash III & M. A. Herrera-Campos. 2000. Lichen decline in Desierto de los Leones (Mexico City). The Bryologist 103: 428-441.