Removing non-linear environmental influences from structural features

Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop - Structural Health Monitoring 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 635-642

  Kullaa, J ^a  

^a HELSINKI METROPOLIA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DAMAGE-SENSITIVE FEATURES; ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES; LATENT VARIABLE MODELS; NONLINEAR EFFECT; NUMERICAL STUDIES; OPERATIONAL VARIABLES; STRUCTURAL FEATURE;

DAMAGE DETECTION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 33846102544     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Kullaa, J. 2002. Elimination of environmental influences from damage-sensitive features in a structural health monitoring system. First European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Paris, July 10-12, 2002. Onera. DEStech Publications. 742-749.
2. Manson, G. 2002. Identifying damage sensitive, environment insensitive features for damage detection. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Identification in Engineering Systems, Swansea, April 15-17, 2002. Institute of Physics Publishing. 187-197.
3. Yan, A.-M, Kerschen, G., De Boe, P. and Golinval, J.-C. 2005. Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions-Part I: A linear analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 19 (2005), 847-864.
4. Vanlanduit, S., Parloo, E., Cauberghe, B., Guillaume, P. and Verboven, P. 2004. A robust singular value decomposition for damage detection under changing operational conditions and structural uncertainties. Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 284 (2005), 1033-1050.
5. Kullaa, J. 2004. Latent variable models to eliminate the environmental effects in structural health monitoring. Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Structural Control. Volume II. R. Flesch, H. Irschik and M. Krommer (eds.). Vienna, Austria, July 12-15, 2004. Vienna University of Technology, S5-55-S5-58.
6. Kullaa, J. 2005. Damage detection under a varying environment using the missing data concept.
7. Kullaa, J. 2003. Is temperature measurement essential in structural health monitoring? Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. Stanford, CA. September 15-17, 2003. Stanford University. DEStech. 717-724.
8. Yan, A.-M., Kerschen, G., De Boe, P. and Golinval, J.-C. 2005. Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions-Part II: local PCA for non-linear cases. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 19 (2005), 865-880.
9. Sohn, H., Worden, K., and Farrar, C.R. 2003. Statistical damage classification under changing environmental and operational conditions. Journal of Intelligent Materials Systems and Structures, Vol. 13, No. 9, 561-574.
10. Kramer, M.A. 1991. Nonlinear principal component analysis using autoassociative neural networks. AIChE Journal, Vol. 37, No. 2, 233-243.
11. Ghahramani, Z. and Hinton, G.E. 1996. The EM-algorithm for mixtures of factor analyzers. University of Toronto. Technical Report CRG-TR-96-1.
12. Sharma, S. 1996. Applied multivariate techniques. New York. John Wiley & Sons. 493 p.
13. Montgomery, D.C. 1997. Introduction to statistical quality control. 3rd ed. New York. John Wiley & Sons. 728 p.
14. Peeters, B. 2000. System ídentification and damage detection in civil engineering. Dissertation. KU. Leuven. 238 p.