Foundations and assumptions of the scientist-practitioner model

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 766-771

  Jones, Jennifer L ^a   Mehr, Shannon L ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assumptions; Foundations; Practitioner; Scientist

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846097398     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: 15523381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002764206296454     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Baker, D. (2000). The affirmation of the scientist-practitioner: A look back at Boulder. American Psychologist, 55, 241-247.
2. Belar, C., & Perry, N. W. (1992). National conference on scientist-practitioner education and training for the professional practice of psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 71-75.
3. Benjamin, L. T., & Baker, D. B. (Eds.). (2000). History of psychology: The Boulder conference. American Psychologist, 55, 233-254.
4. Committee on Training in Clinical Psychology. (1947). Recommended graduate training program in clinical psychology. American Psychologist, 2, 539-558.
5. O'Sullivan, J. J., & Quevillon, R. P. (1992). 40 years later, is the Boulder model still alive? American Psychologist, 47, 67-70.
6. Raimy, V. C. (Ed). (1950). Training in clinical psychology (Boulder conference). New York: Prentice Hall.
7. Shapiro, D. (2002). Renewing the scientist-practitioner model. The Psychologist, 15, 232-234.
8. Shapiro, M. B. (1967). Clinical psychology as an applied science. British Journal of Psychiatry, 113, 1039-1042.
9. Shapiro, M. B. (1985). A reassessment of clinical psychology as an applied science. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 1-11.
10. Stoner, G., & Green, S. (1992). Reconsidering the scientist-practitioner model for school psychology practice. School Psychology Review, 21, 155-167.
11. Thorne, F. C. (1947). The clinical method in science. American Psychologist, 2, 159-166.