The capacities and challenges of faith-based human service organizations

Public Administration Review

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 115-126

  Clerkin, Richard M ^a   Grønbjerg, Kirsten A ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846092321     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: 15406210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00701.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Brantner, Paula A. 2002. The Employment Discrimination Implications of Charitable Choice Legislation. Employee Rights Quarterly 2(4): 75-79.
2. Bromley, David G. 1998. Transformative Movements and Quasi-Religious Corporations: The Case of Amway. In Sacred Companies: Organizational Aspects of Religion and Religious Aspects of Organizations, edited by Neal J. Demerath III, 349-63. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Cameron, Helen. 2004. Typology of Religious Characteristics of Social Service and Educational Organizations and Programs - A European Response. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33(1): 146-51.
4. Carlson-Thies, Stanley. 1999. Faith-Based Institutions Cooperating with Public Welfare: The Promise of the Charitable Choice Provision. In Welfare Reform and Faith-Based Organizations, edited by Derek Davis and Barry Hankins, 29-60. Waco, TX: Baylor University, J.M. Dawson Institute of Church-State Studies.
5. Chambré, Susan M. 2001. The Changing Nature of "Faith" in Faith-Based Organizations: Secularization and Ecumenicism in Four AIDS Organizations in New York City. Social Service Review 75(3): 435-55.
6. Chaves, Mark. 1999. Religious Congregations and Welfare Reform: Who Will Take Advantage of "Charitable Choice"? American Sociological Review 64(6): 836-46.
7. _. 2001. Religious Congregations and Welfare Reform. Society 38(2): 21-28.
8. Chaves, Mark, Mary Ellen Konieczny, Kraig Beyerlein, and Emily Barman. 1999. The National Congregations Study: Background, Methods, and Selected Results. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 38(4): 458-76.
9. Cnaan, Ram A., and Stephanie C. Boddie. 2002. Charitable Choice and Faith-Based Welfare: A Call for Social Work. Social Work 47(3): 224-35.
10. De Vita, Carol J., and Sarah Wilson. 2001. Faith-Based Initiatives: Sacred Deeds and Secular Dollars. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
11. Dilulio, John J. 2002. Three Faith Factors. The Public Interest, Fall, www.brook.edu/views/articles/diiulio/pi_fall2002.htm [accessed October 15, 2006].
12. Greenberg, Anna. 2000. Doing Whose Work? Faith-Based Organizations and Government Partnerships. In Who Will Provide? The Changing Role of Religion in American Social Welfare, edited by Mary Jo Bane, Brent Coffin, and Ronald Thiemann, 178-97. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
13. Grønbjerg, Kirsten A. 2002. Evaluating Nonprofit Databases. American Behavioral Scientist 45(11): 1741-77.
14. Grønbjerg, Kirsten A., and Richard M. Clerkin. 2005. Examining the Landscape of Indiana's Nonprofit Sector: Does What You Know Depend on Where You Look? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 34(2): 232-59.
15. Grønbjerg, Kirsten A., and Brent Never. 2004. The Role of Religious Networks and Other Factors in Types of Volunteer Work. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 14(3): 263-90.
16. Grønbjerg, Kirsten A. and Lester M. Salamon. 2002. Devolution, Privatization and the Changing Shape of Government-Nonprofit Relations. In The State of the Nonprofit Sector, edited by Lester M. Salamon, 447-70. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
17. Hodgkinson, Virginia A., and Murray S. Weitzman. 1993. From Belief to Commitment: The Community Service Activities and Finances of Religious Congregations in the United States: 1993 Edition. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
18. Jeavons, Thomas. 1998. Identifying Characteristics of Religious Organizations: An Exploratory Proposal. In Sacred Companies: Organizational Aspects of Religion and Religious Aspects of Organizations, edited by Neal J. Demerath III, 79-96. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. _. 2004. Religious and Faith-Based Organizations: Do We Know One When We See One? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33(1): 140-45.
20. Kennedy, Sheik Suess. 2001. Constitutional Competence of Nonprofit Managers. Paper presented at the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action Conference, November 28-December 1, Miami, FL.
21. Kennedy, Sheila Suess, and Wolfgang Bielefeld. 2002. Government Shekels without Government Shackles? The Administrative Challenges of Charitable Choice. Public Administration Review 62(1): 4-11.
22. Lynn, Laurence E., Jr. 2002. Social Services and the State: The Public Appropriation of Private Charity. Social Service Review 76: 58-82.
23. Matsui, Elena, and Joseph Chuman. 2001. The Case against Charitable Choice. The Humanist 61(1): 31-33.
24. Monsma, Stephen V. 1996. When Sacred and Secular Mix: Religious Nonprofit Organizations and Public Money. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
25. Nathan, Richard P., and David J. Wright. 2003. Is Charitable Choice Compatible with the First Amendment? Is It a Good Idea? Does It Work? www.religionandsocialpolicy.org/publications/publication.cfm?id=42 [accessed October 15, 2006].
26. Netting, F. Ellen. 2004. Commentary on Typology of Religious Characteristics of Social Service and Educational Organizations and Programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33(1): 135-39.
27. Olasky, Marvin. 1992. The Tragedy of American Compassion. Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway.
28. Segal, Julie A. 1999. A "Holy Mistaken Zeal": The Legislative History and Future of Charitable Choice. In Welfare Reform and Faith-Based Organizations, edited by Derek Davis and Barry Hankins, 9-28. Waco, TX: Baylor University, J.M. Dawson Institute of Church-State Studies.
29. Sider, Ronald J., and Heidi R. Unruh. 2004. Typology of Religious Characteristics of Social Service and Educational Organizations and Programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33(1): 109-34.
30. Smith, Steven Rathgeb, and Michael R Sosin. 2001. The Varieties of Faith-Related Agencies. Public Administration Review 61(6): 651-70.
31. Steensland, Brian, Jerry Z. Park, Mark D. Regnerus, Lynn D. Robinson, W. Bradford Wilcox, and Robert D. Woodberry. 2000. The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art. Social Forces 79(1): 291-318.
32. Thiemann, Ronald, Samuel Herring, and Betsy Perabo. 2000. Risks and Responsibilities for Faith-Based Organizations. In Who Will Provide? The Changing Role of Religion in American Social Welfare, edited by Mary Jo Bane, Brent Coffin, and Ronald Thiemann, 51-70. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
33. Trulear, Harold D. 2000. Faith-Based Institutions and High-Risk Youth. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
34. U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 2002. Charitable Choice: Overview of Research Findings on Implementation. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. GAO-02-337. www.gao.gov/new.items/d02337.pdf [accessed October 15, 2006].
35. White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives. 2003. Rallying the Armies of Compassion, www.whitehouse.gov/news/reports/faithbased. html [accessed October 15, 2006].