Newborn screening: Toward a uniform screening panel and system - Executive summary

Pediatrics

Volumn 117, Issue 5, 2006, Pages

  Watson, Michael S ^a,e   Mann, Marie Y ^e   Lloyd Puryear, Michele A ^e   Rinaldo, Piero ^q   Howell, R Rodney ^c   Cordero, Jose ^b   Edwards, E Steven ^c   Howse, Jennifer L ^d   Mullaley, Tricia ^e   Van Dyck, Peter ^f   Becker, William ^g   Boyle, Coleen ^b   Cunningham, George C ^h   DeBaun, Michael R ⁱ   Downs, Stephen M ^j   Goldman, Edward ^k   Goodman, Stephen I ^l   Guerra, Fernando ^e   Hannon, W Harry ^b   Hanson, James ^m   Larson, Cecilia ⁿ   McLean, Scott ^o   Randhawa, Gurvaneet ^p   Robertson, Derek ^e   Rothstein, Mark ^r   Steiner, Robert D ^s   Suter, Sonia ^t   Therrell, Bradford ^u   Tonniges, Thomas ^e   Yazzie, Wanda ^e   Bailey, Donald ^v   Kaye, Celia I ^u   Kemper, Alex R ^w   Pass, Kenneth ^x   Puck, Jennifer M ^y   Desposito, Franklin ^z   Hoffman, Gary ^aa   Stagni, Kathy ^ab   Strauss, Arnold ^ac   Trotter, Tracy ^e   Willey, Anne M ^x   Levy, Harvey L ^ad   Eckman, James R ^ae   Lorey, Fred ^h   Marsden, Deborah L ^ad   Miller, Julie ^af   Laraque, Danielle ^ag   Leight, Kelly R ^ah   Yawn, Barbara ^ai   Goldman, Edward B ^l   Dozier, Beverly ^e   Fleisher, Lynn D ^e   more..

^a Hlth Rsrc/Service Administration   (United States)

^b CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d March of Dimes Birth Defects Organization

^e Genetic Alliance ^*

^f Maternal and Child Health Bureau   (United States)

^g OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

ⁱ WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^j INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HOSPITALS   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^m EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

ⁿ New England Newborn Screening Program   (United States)

^o U S ARMY   (United States)

^p AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY   (United States)

^q Mayo Clinic   (United States)

^r UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

^s OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^t GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^u UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^v UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^w UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^x NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH   (United States)

^y NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^z UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

^aa WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE   (United States)

^ab Organic Acidemia Association

^ac VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^ad BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^ae EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^af Nebraska Department of Health   (United States)

^ag MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^ah CARES Foundation   (United States)

^ai AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Congenital; Genetics; Newborn; Panel; Public health; Screening

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NEWBORN SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 33846082765     PISSN: 00314005     EISSN: 02105721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-2633I     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Blood Collection on Filter Paper for Newborn Screening Programs: Approved Standard. 4th ed. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2003
2. American Academy of Pediatrics, Newborn Screening Task Force. Serving the family from birth to the medical home: newborn screening: a blueprint for the future. Pediatrics. 2000;106:389-427
3. National Academy of Sciences. Genetic Screening: Programs, Principles, and Research. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 1975
4. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Data and methods used in OTA's cost-effectiveness analysis of strategies for newborn screening. In: Healthy Children: Investing in the Future. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1988:236-241. Publication OTA-H-345. Available at: www.wws.princeton.edu/ota/ns20/alpha_f.html
5. McCabe ERB. Principle of newborn screening for metabolic disease. Perinatol Neonatol. 1982;6:63-73
6. Therrell BL, Panny SR, Davidson A, et al. US newborn screening system guidelines: statement of the Council of Regional Networks for Genetic Services. Screening. 1992;1:135-147