The Record as a Formative Tool: A Study of Immanent Pedagogy in the Practice of Vocational Guidance

Qualitative Social Work

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 431-449

  Mäkitalo, Åsa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

documentation; immanent pedagogy; institutional talk; socialization; vocational guidance

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846076870     PISSN: 14733250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473325005058645     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Agar, M.(1985) Institutional discourse, Text 5(3): 147-168.
2. Antaki, C.(1994) Explaining and Arguing: The Social Organization ofAccounts. London: Sage.
3. Bergmann, J.(1992) ‘Veiled Morality: Notes on Discretion inPsychiatry’, in P. Drew and J. Heritage(eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in InstitutionalSettings, pp.137-162. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bergmann, J.(1998) ‘Introduction: Morality in Discourse’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(3-4): 279-294.
5. Bergmann, J. and Linell, P.(1998) ‘Morality in Discourse’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(3-4): 279-473.
6. Billig, M.(1996) Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical View of SocialPsychology, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Bowker, G. and Star, S. L.(2000) Sorting Things Out: Classification and itsConsequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Buttny, R.(1993) Social Accountability in Communication. London: Sage.
9. Cedersund, E.(1992) Talk, Text and Institutional Order: A Study ofCommunication in Social Welfare Bureaucracies. Linköping, Sweden: LinköpingStudies in Arts and Science.
10. Cook-Gumperz, J. and Messerman, L.(1999) ‘Local Identities and InstitutionalPractices: Constructing the Record of ProfessionalCollaboration’, in S. Sarangi and C. Roberts(eds) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical,Mediation and Management Settings, pp. 146-181. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
11. Drew, P. and Heritage, J.(1992) Talk at Work: Interaction in InstitutionalSettings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Feinberg, J.(1970) ‘Action andResponsibility’, in Doing and Deserving, pp.119-151. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Foucault, M.(1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.
14. Goffman, E.(1952) ‘On Cooling the Mark Out: Some Aspects of Adaptation to Failure’, Psychiatry 15(4): 451-463.
15. Goffman, E.(1983) ‘Felicity's Condition’, American Journal of Sociology 89(1): 1-53.
16. Goodman, N.(1978) Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
17. Hall, C., Juhila, K., Parton, N. and Pösö, T.(eds) (2003) Constructing Clienthood in Social Work and HumanServices: Interaction, Identities and Practices. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
18. Hall, C., Sarangi, S. and Slembrouck, S.(1997) ‘Moral Construction in Social WorkDiscourse’, in B. Gunnarsson, P. Linell and B. Nordberg(eds) The Construction of Professional Discourse, pp.265-291. London: Longman.
19. Hall, C., Sarangi, S. and Slembrouck, S.(1999) ‘The Legitimation of the Client and theProfession: Identities and Roles in Social Work Discourse’,in S. Sarangi and C. Roberts(eds) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical,Mediation and Management Settings, pp. 293-322. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
20. Heath, C.(1992) ‘The Delivery and Reception of Diagnosisin the General-practice Consultation’, in P. Drew and J. Heritage(eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, pp.235-267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Jokinen, A., Juhila, K. and Pösö, T.(1999) Constructing Social Work Practices. Aldershot: Ashgate.
22. Jönsson, L., Linell, P. and Säljö, R.(1991) ‘Formulating the Past: Remembering in the Police-interrogation’, Activity Theory 9(10): 5-11.
23. Levinson, S.(1992) ‘Activity Types andLanguage’, in P. Drew and J. Heritage(eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, pp.66-100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Lindh, G.(1998) Samtalet i Studie-ochYrkesvägledningsprocessen [The Interview in the Career CounsellingProcess]. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.
25. Linell, P. and Fredin, E.(1995) ‘Negotiating Terms in Social WelfareOffice Talk’, in A. Firth(ed.) The Discourse of Negotiation, pp.299-318. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
26. Lipsky, M.(1980) Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individualin Public Services. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27. Longman, J. and Mercer, N.(1993) ‘Forms for Talk and Talk for Forms: Oral and Literate Dimensionsof Language use in Employment Training Interviews’, Text 13(1): 91-116.
28. Mäkitalo, Å.(2002) Categorizing Work: Knowing, Arguing, and SocialDilemmas in Vocational Guidance. Göteborg, Sweden: ACTA Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
29. Mäkitalo, Å. (2003) ‘Accounting Practices as Situated Knowing: Dilemmas and Dynamicsin Institutional Categorization’, Discourse Studies 5(4): 495-516.
30. Mäkitalo, Å. and Säljö, R.(2002) ‘Invisible People: Institutional Reasoning and Reflexivity in theProduction of Services and “Social Facts” in PublicEmployment Agencies’, Mind, Culture, and Activity 9(3): 160-178.
31. Mattsson, K.(1984) Yrkesvalsfrågan: Idéer ochIdétraditioner Inom den Statliga Yrkesvägledningenför Ungdom[The Issue of Vocational Choice: Ideas and Traditions ofIdeas of Public Vocational Guidance for the Young]. Malmö, Sweden: Liber Förlag.
32. Mehan, H.(1996) Constructing School Success: The Consequences ofUntracking Low Achieving Students. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Mehan, H., Hertweck, A. and Meihls, J. L.(1986) Handicapping the Handicapped: Decision Making inStudents’ Educational Careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
34. Mercer, N. and Longman, J.(1992) ‘Accounts and the Development of Shared Understanding inEmployment Training Interviews’, Text 12(1): 103-125.
35. Olesen, S. P.(2001) ‘Discourses of Activation at DanishEmployment Offices’, in M. Seltzer, C. Kullberg, S. P. Olesen and I. Rostila(eds) Listening to the Welfare State, pp.103-137. Aldershot: Ashgate.
36. Prottas, J. M.(1979) People-Processing: The Street-level Bureaucrat inPublic Service Bureaucracies. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
37. Ravotas, R. and Berkenkotter, C.(1998) ‘Voices in the Text: The Uses of Reported Speech in aPsychotherapist's Notes and Initial Assessments’, Text 18(2): 211-240.
38. Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C.(eds) (1999) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse inMedical, Mediation and Management Settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
39. Sarangi, S. and Slembrouck, S.(1996) Language, Bureaucracy and Social Control. London: Longman.
40. Shapiro, M.(1988) The Politics of Representation: Writing Practices inBiography, Photography and Policy Analysis. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
41. Shotter, J.(1991) ‘The Rhetorical-responsive Nature ofMind: A Social Constructionist Account’, in A. Still and A. Costall(eds) Against Cognitivism, pp. 55-79. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
42. Smith, D.(1984) ‘Textually Mediated Social Organization’, International Social Science Journal 36(1): 59-75.
43. Smith, D.(1990) The Conceptual Practices of Power: A FeministSociology of Knowledge. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
44. Super, D.(1957) The Psychology of Careers. New York: Harper & Row.
45. Vehviläinen, S.(1999) Structures of Counselling Interaction: A ConversationAnalytic Study of Counselling Encounters in Career Guidance Training. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
46. White, S.(2003) ‘The Social Worker as Moral Judge: Blame,Responsibility and Case Formulation’, in C. Hall, K. Juhila, N. Parton and T. Pösö(eds) Constructing Client-hood in Social Work and Human Services:Interaction, Identities and Practices, pp. 177-192. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.