Spectral and physiological uniqueness of perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium)

Weed Science

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1051-1062

  Andrew, Margaret E ^a   Ustin, Susan L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Airborne Visible Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS); Classification and regression trees (CART); HyMap; Hyperspectral; Physiological indexes; Remote sensing; Spectral indexes

Indexed keywords

FLOWERING; HERB; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; PERENNIAL PLANT; PHENOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE; VEGETATION MAPPING; WEED;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA; SAN FRANCISCO BAY; UNITED STATES;

LEPIDIUM; LEPIDIUM LATIFOLIUM;

EID: 33846070724     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WS-06-063R1.1     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Asner, G. P. and P. M. Vitousek. 2005. Remote analysis of biological invasion and biogeochemical change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:4383-4386.
2. Barnes, J. D., L. Balaguer, E. Manrique, S. Elvira, and A. W. Davison. 1992. A reappraisal of the use of DMSO for the extraction and determination of chlorophylls a and b in lichens and higher plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 32:85-100.
3. Blank, R. R., R. G. Quails, and J. A. Young. 2002. Lepidium latifolium: plant nutrient competition-soil interactions. Biol. Fertil. Soils 35:458-464.
4. Blank, R. R. and J. A. Young. 2002. Influence of the exotic invasive crucifer, Lepidium latifolium, on soil properties and elemental cycling. Soil Sci. 167:821-829.
5. Breiman, L., J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone. 1998. Classification and Regression Trees. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
6. Cochrane, M. A. 2000. Using vegetation reflectance variability for species level classification of hyperspectral data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 21:2075-2087.
7. Cocks, T., R. Jennsen, A. Stewart, I. Wilson, and T. Shields. 1998. The HyMap airborne hyperspectral sensor: the system, calibration and performance. Pages 37-42 in M. Schaepman, D. Schlapfer, and F. I. Itten, eds. Proceedings of the 1st EARSEL Workshop on Imaging Spectroscopy, Zurich, Switzerland. Paris: European Association of Remote Sensing Laboratories.
8. De'ath, G. and K. E. Fabricius. 2000. Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81:3178-3192.
9. Drewitz, J. 2000. Conium maculatum L. Pages 120-123 in C. C. Bossard, J. M. Randall, and M. C. Hoshovsky, eds. Invasive Plants of California's Wildlands. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
10. Elmore, A. J., J. F. Mustard, S. J. Manning, and D. B. Lobell. 2000. Quantifying vegetation change in semiarid environments: precision and accuracy of spectral mixture analysis and the normalized difference vegetation index. Remote Sens. Environ. 73:87-102.
11. Everitt, J. H. and C. J. Deloach. 1990. Remote sensing of Chinese tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis) and associated vegetation. Weed Sci. 38:273-278.
12. Fuentes, D. A., J. A. Gamon, H.-L. Qiu, D. A. Sims, and D. A. Roberts. 2001. Mapping Canadian boreal forest vegetation using pigment and water absorption features derived from the AVIRIS sensor. J. Geophys. Res. 106:33565-33577.
13. Gao, B.-C. 1996. NDWI-a normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sens. Environ. 58:257-266.
14. Garcia, M. and S. L. Ustin. 2001. Detection of interannual vegetation responses to climatic variability using AVIRIS data in a coastal savanna in California. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 39:1480-1490.
15. Gillham, J. H., A. L. Hild, J. H. Johnson, E. R. Hunt, and T. D. Whitson. 2004. Weed invasion susceptibility prediction (WISP) model for use with geographic information systems. Arid Land Res. Manag. 18:1-12.
16. Green, R. O., M. L. Eastwood, C. M. Sarture, et al. 1998. Imaging spectroscopy and the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS). Remote Sens. Environ. 65:227-248.
17. Herold, M., D. A. Roberts, M. E. Gardner, and P. E. Dennison. 2004. Spectrometry for urban area remote sensing-development and analysis of a spectral library from 350 to 2,400 nm. Remote Sens. Environ. 91:304-319.
18. Howald, A. 2000. Lepidium latifolium L. Pages 222-227 in C. C. Bossard, J. M. Randall, and M. C. Hoshovsky, eds. Invasive Plants of California's Wildlands. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
19. Jacquemoud, S. and F. Baret. 1990. PROSPECT: A model of leaf optical properties spectra. Remote Sens. Environ. 34:75-91.
20. Laba, M., F. Tsai, D. Ogurcak, S. Smith, and M. E. Richmond. 2005. Field determination of optimal dates for the discrimination of invasive wetland plant species using derivative spectral analysis. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 71:603-611.
21. Lewis, M., V. Jooste, and A. A. de Gasparis. 2001. Discrimination of arid vegetation with airborne multispectral scanner hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 39:1471-1479.
22. Lichtenthaler, H. K., M. Lang, M. Sowinska, F. Heisel, and J. A. Miehe. 1996. Detection of vegetation stress via a new high resolution fluorescence imaging system. J. Plant Physiol. 148:599-612.
23. Lu, D., M. Batistella, and E. Moran. 2004. Multitemporal spectral mixture analysis for Amazonian land-cover change detection. Can. J. Remote Sens. 30:87-100.
24. Mack, R. N., D. Simberloff, W. M. Lonsdale, H. Evans, M. Clout, and F. A. Bazzaz. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 10:689-710.
25. Nagler, P. L., C.S.T. Daughtry, and S. N. Coward. 2000. Plant litter and soil reflectance. Remote Sens. Environ. 71:207-215.
26. Okin, G. S., D. A. Roberts, B. Murray, and W. J. Okin. 2001. Practical limits on hyperspectral vegetation discrimination in arid and semiarid environments. Remote Sens. Environ. 77:212-225.
27. Peña-Barragan, J. M., F. Lopez-Granados, M. Jurado-Exposito, and L. Garcia-Torres. 2006. Spectral discrimination of Ridolfia segetum and sunflower as affected by phenological stage. Weed Res. 46:10-21.
28. Peñuelas, J., F. Baret, and I. Filella. 1995a. Semi-empirical indices to assess carotenoids/chlorophyll a ratio from leaf spectral reflectance. Photosynthetica 31:221-230.
29. Peñuelas, J., I. Filella, P. Lloret, F. Muñoz, and M. Vilajeliu. 1995b. Reflectance assessment of mite effects on apple trees. Int. J. Remote Sens. 16:2727-2733.
30. Peñuelas, J., J. Pinol, R. Ogaya, and I. Filella. 1997. Estimation of plant water concentration by the reflectance Water Index WI (R900/R970). Int. J. Remote Sens. 18:2869-2875.
31. Price, J. C. 1994. How unique are spectral signatures? Remote Sens. Environ. 49:181-186.
32. Rahman, A. F., J. A. Gamon, D. A. Fuentes, D. A. Roberts, and D. Prentiss. 2001. Modeling spatially distributed ecosystem flux of boreal forest using hyperspectral indices from AVIRIS imagery. J. Geophys. Res. 106:33579-33591.
33. Roberts, D. A., G. T. Batista, J.L.G. Pereira, E. K. Waller, and B. W. Nelson. 1998. Change identification using multitemporal spectral mixture analysis: applications in Eastern Amazonia. Pages 137-161 in R. S. Lunetta and C. D. Elvidge, eds. Remote Sensing Change Detection: Environmental Monitoring Methods and Applications. Chelsea, MI: Ann Arbor.
34. Roberts, D. A., R. O. Green, and J. B. Adams. 1997. Temporal and spatial patterns in vegetation and atmospheric properties from AVIRIS. Remote Sens. Environ. 62:223-240.
35. Rogan, J., J. Franklin, and D. A. Roberts. 2002. A comparison of methods for monitoring multitemporal vegetation change using Thematic Mapper imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 80:143-156.
36. Root, R., S. Ustin, P. Zarco-Tejada, et al. 2002. Comparison of AVIRIS and EO-1 Hyperion for classification and mapping of invasive leafy spurge in Theodore Roosevelt National Park. Proceedings of the 11th Earth Science Airborne Workshop. Pasadena, CA: Jet Propulsion Laboratory. (http:popo.jlp.nasa.gov/pub/ docs/workshops/02-docs/toc.html).
37. Rosenfield, G. H. and K. Fitzpatrick-Lins. 1986. A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 52:223-227.
38. Schmid, T., M. Koch, and J. Gumuzzio. 2005. Multisensor approach to determine changes of wetland characteristics in semiarid environments (Central Spain). IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 43:2516-2525.
39. Schmidt, K. S. and A. K. Skidmore. 2003. Spectral discrimination of vegetation types in a coastal wetland. Remote Sens. Environ. 85:92-108.
40. Serrano, L., J. Peñuelas, and S. L. Ustin. 2002. Remote sensing of nitrogen and lignin in Mediterranean vegetation from AVIRIS data: decomposing biochemical from structural signals. Remote Sens. Environ. 81:355-364.
41. Tucker, C. J. 1979. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens. Environ. 8:127-150.
42. Underwood, E., S. Ustin, and D. DiPietro. 2003. Mapping nonnative plants using hyperspectral imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 86:150-161.
43. Underwood, E., S. L. Ustin, and C. M. Ramirez. 2006. A comparison of spatial and spectral image resolution for mapping invasive plants in coastal California. Environ. Manag. In press.
44. Ustin, S. L., S. S. Rajapakse, S. Khanna, et al. 2005. Mapping Invasive Plant Species in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Region Using Hyperspectral Imagery: Report Submitted to California Department of Boating and Waterways, Davis, CA: University of California. Williamson, M. 1999. Invasions. Ecography 22:5-12.
45. Young, J. A., D. E. Palmquist, and R. R. Blank. 1998. The ecology and control of perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium L.). Weed Technol. 12:402-405.
46. Young, J. A., D. E. Palmquist, and S. O. Wotring. 1997. The invasive nature of Lepidium latifolium: a review. Pages 59-68 in J. H. Brock, M. Wade, P. Pysek, and D. Green, eds. Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe. Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys.
47. Zarco-Tejada, P. J. 1998. Optical Indices as Bioindicators of Forest Sustainability: Research Evaluation Course. Toronto, Canada: York University.