On grandiosity in personality psychology

American Psychologist

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 60-61

  McAdams, Dan P ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846068829     PISSN: 0003066X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/003-066X62.1.60     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Epstein, S. (2007). Problems with McAdams and Pals's (2006) proposal of a framework for an integrative theory of personality. American Psychologist. 62, 59-60.
2. Hogan, R. (1982). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In M. M. Page (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 30. Personality: Current theory and research (pp. 55-89). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
3. Maddi, S. R. (1968). Personality theories: A comparative analysis. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
4. Maddi, S. R. (2007). Personality theories facilitate integrating the five principles and deducing hypotheses for testing. American Psychologist, 62, 58-59.
5. McAdams, D. P. (2006). The person: A new introduction to personality psychology (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.
6. McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204-217.
7. Wood, A., & Joseph, S. (2007). Grand theories of personality cannot be integrated. American Psychologist, 62, 57-58.