Correlation between paleosol-soil magnetic signal and climate

Earth, Planets and Space

Volumn 58, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1373-1380

  Orgeira, Maria Julia ^a,b   Compagnucci, R H ^a,b  

^a Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Environmental magnetism; Late Cenozoic; Loess and paleosol sequences; Paleoclimate

Indexed keywords

CENOZOIC; GEOMAGNETISM; MAGNETIC MINERAL; MAGNETIC PROPERTY; PALEOCLIMATE; PALEOMAGNETISM; PALEOSOL;

ARGENTINA; ASIA; CHINA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; SOUTH AMERICA;

EID: 33846049718     PISSN: 13438832     EISSN: 18805981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/BF03352633     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ameghino, F., Contribución al conocimiento de los mamíferos fósiles de la República Argentina, Academia Nacional de Ciencias, VI, 1-1027, Córdoba, 1889.
2. Ameghino, F., Las formaciones sedimentarias de la región litoral de Mar del Plata y Chapadmalal, An. Museo Nac. Histor. Nat., 10, 343-428, 1908.
3. Appelo, C. A. J. and D. Postma, Geochestry, Groundwater and Pollution, Balkema, Rotterdam, 1993.
4. Banerjee, S. K. and C. Hunt, Separation of local signals from the regional paleomonsoon record of the Chinese loess plateau. A rock-magnetic approach, Geophy. Res. Lett., 20, 843-846, 1993.
5. Bloemendal, J. and X. Liu, Rock magnetism and geochemistry of two pliopleistocene Chinese loess-paleosols sequences- implications for quantitative paleoprecipitation reconstruction, Paleogeograph. Paleoclimatol. Paleoecol., 226, 149-166, 2005.
6. Canfield, D. E. and R. A. Berner, Dissolution and pyritization of magnetite in anoxic marine sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 51, 645-659, 1987.
7. Claperton, C., Quaternary Geology and Geomorphology of South America, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1993.
8. Dunne, T. and L. B. Leopold, Water in Environmental Planning, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1978.
9. Evans, M. E. and F. Heller, Environmental Magnetism. Principles and Applications of Enviromagnetics, Academic press, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2003.
10. Fang, X.-M., J.-J. Li, S. K. Banerjee, M. Jackson, E. Oches, and R. van der Von, Millennial-scale climatic change during the last interglacial period: superparamagnetic sediment proxy from paleosol S1, western Chinese Loess Plateau, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2485-2488, 1999.
11. Fidalgo, F., Provincia de Buenos Aires. Continental. CADINQUA, edited by M. Iriondo, El Holoceno en la Argentina, vol. 1, pp. 23-38, 1992.
12. Fidalgo, F., F. De Francesco, and R. Pascual, Geologia Superficial de la Llanura Bonaerense. In: Geologia de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, VI Congreso Geologico Argentino, Relatorio, Bahá Blanca, 103-138, 1975.
13. Fidalgo, E, J. C. Riggi, R. O. Gentile, H. A. Correa, and N. Porro, Los "Sedimentos Postpampeanos" continentales en el ámbito sur bonaerense, Rev. Asoc. Geol. Argentina, 46, 239-256, 1991.
14. Florindo, F., A. P. Roberts, and M. R. Palmer, Mangetite dissolution in sili-ceous sediments, Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems, 4, 2003.
15. Freeze, R. A. and J. A. Cherry, Groundwater, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1979.
16. Frenguelli, J., Observaciones geológicas en la región costanera Sur de la Provincia. de Buenos Aires, Univers. Nac. Litoral. Fac. Cienc. Educac., An. II, 1-145, 1928.
17. Frenguelli, J., El Platense y sus diatomeas. Museo de la Plata Rev. II (nueva ser.), Geol. 1 and 3 Paleontológica, 287-311 and 77-221, 1945.
18. Frenguelli, J., Rasgos generales de la morfología y geología de la provincia de Buenos Aires. Provincia de Buenos aires, Ministerio de Obras Públicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Lab. Ensayos Materiales Invest. Tecnol. (LEMIT) Ser. II, 33, 1-72, 1950.
19. Frenguelli, J., Loess y limos pampeanos. Serie Técnica y didáctica No. 7 Ministerio de Educación de la Nación, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo de La Plata, 1955.
20. Frenguelli, J., Neozoico. En Geografía de la República Argentina II (3), 1-218, GAEA, Soc. Argentina Estud. Geográf, Buenos Aires, 1957.
21. Han, J., H. Lu, N. Wu, and Z. Guo, Magnetic susceptibility of modern soils in China and climate conditions, Stud. Geophys. Geodet., 40, 262-275, 1996.
22. Heller, F., X. Liu, T. S. Wu, and T. C. Xu, Magnetic susceptibility of loess in China, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 103, 301-310, 1991.
23. Heller, F., C. D. Shen, J. Beer, X. M. Liu, T. S. Liu, and A. Bronger, Quantitative estimates and paleoclimatic, implications of pedogenic ferromagnetic mineral formation in Chinese loess, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 114, 385-390, 1993.
24. Liu, Q., S. Banerjee, M. J. Jackson, F. Chen, Y. Pan, and R. Zhu, Determining the climatic boundary between the Chinese loess and palaeosol: evidence from aeolian coarse-grained magnetite, Geophys. J. Int. Volcanol., 156, 267-274, 2004.
25. Liu, X., J. Shaw, T. Liu, F. Heller, and B. Yuan, Magnetic mineralogy of Chinese Loess and its significance, Quaternary Research, 42, 162-165, 1992.
26. Liu, X., T. Rolph, J. Bloemendal, J. Shaw, and T. S. Liu, Quantitative estimates of paleoprecipitation at Xinfeng, in the Loess Plateau of China, Paleogeograph. Paleoclimatol. Paleoecol., 13, 243-248, 1995.
27. MacBride, J., Environmental Chemistry of Soils, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994.
28. Maher, B. A., Characterization of soils by mineral magnetic measurements, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 42, 76-92, 1986.
29. Maher, B., Magnetic properties of modern soils and Quaternary loessic paleosols: paleoclimatic implications, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 137, 25-54, 1998.
30. Maher, B. and R. Taylor, Formation of ultrafine-grained magnetite in soils, Nature, 336, 368-379, 1988.
31. Maher, B. and R. Thompson, Mineral magnetic record of the Chinese loess and paleosols, Geology, 19, 3-6, 1991.
32. Maher, B. and R. Thompson, Pedogenesis and paleoclimate. Interpretation of the magnetic susceptibility record of Chinese loess-paleosol sequences, Geology, 22, 857-859, 1994.
33. Maher, B. A. and R. Thompson, Paleorainfall reconstruction from pedogenic magnetic susceptibility variations in the Chinese loess and paleosols, Quat. Res., 44, 383-391, 1995.
34. Maher, B. A. and R. Thompson (eds.), Quaternary Climates, Environments and Magnetism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
35. Maher, B. A., A. Alekseev, and T. Alekseeva, Magnetic mineralogy of soils across the Russian Steppe: climatic dependence of pedogenic magnetite formation, Palaeogeograph. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeocol., 201, 321-341, 2003.
36. Mullins, C. E., Magnetic susceptibility of the soil and its significance in soil sequence - a review, J. Soil Sci., 28, 223-246, 1977.
37. Nicolli, H. B., A. Tineo, J. W. García, C.M. Falcón, M. H. Merino, M. C. Etchechurry, M. S. Alonso, and O. R. Tófalo, The role of loess in groundwater at salí River Basin, Argentina, in Water-rock Interation, vol. 2, edited by R. W. Wanty and R. R. Seal II, 1591-1595, Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, 2004.
38. Orgeira, M. J., A. M. Walther, C. A. Vásquez, I. Di Tommaso, S. Alonso, G. Sherwood, Yuang Hu, and J. F. A. Vilas, Mineral magnetic record of paleoclimate variation in loess and paleosol from the Buenos Aires formation (Buenos Aires, Argentina), J. South Am. Earth Sci., 11, 561-570, 1998.
39. Orgeira, M. J., A. M. Walther, R. Tófalo, C. A. Vásquez, T. Berquó, C. Favier Dubois, and H. Bhonel, Environmental magnetism in fluvial and loessic Holocene sediments and paleosols from the Chacopampean Plain (Argentina), J. South Am. Earth Sci., 16, 259-274, 2003.
40. Orgeira, M. J., F. X. Pereyra, C. Vásquez, E. Castañeda, and R. Compagnucci, Señal magnética en suelos actuales de la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina: su relación con el clima, Rev. Espan. Geo-Temas, 6, 311-314, 2004.
41. Orgeira, M. J., F. X. Pereyra, C. Vásquez, E. Castañeda, and R. Compagnucci, Environmental magnetism in present soils, Buenos Aires province, Argentina, J. South Am. Earth Sci., 2006 (in press).
42. Parodi, L. J. and R. Parodi Bustos, Apuntes para la geología de la costa Atlántica de la provincia de Buenos Aires, con descripción de la Formación Malacara, An. Soc. Científ. Argentina, 153, 139-156, 1952.
43. Pascual, R., E. Ortega Hinojosa, D. Gordar, and E. Tonni, Las edades del Cenozoico mamalífero de la Argentina con especial atención a aquellos del territorio bonaerense, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Com. Invest. Científ. An., 6, 165-193, 1965.
44. Stumm, W., Chemestry of the solid-water interface. Processes at the mineral-water and particle-water interface in natural systems, Wiley-Interscience, John Wiley and Sons, New Yorkp, 1992.
45. Teruggi, M. E., The nature and origin of the Argentinian loess, J. Sediment. Petrol., 27, 322-332, 1957.
46. Thornthwaite, C. W., An approach toward a rational classification of climate, Geograph. Rev., 38, 55-94, 1948.
47. Vásquez, C. A., A. M. Walther, M. J. Orgeira, I. Di Tommaso, S. Alonso, and J. F. A. Vilas, Magnetic properties and environmental conditions: study of a paleosol of Chacopampean plain (Argentina), Quat. South Am. Antarctic Peninsula, 11, 195-206, 1998.
48. Walther, A. M., M. J. Orgeira, and H. F. Lippai, Magnetismo de rocas en sedimentos cenozoicos tardíos en San Antonio de Areco provincia de Buenos Aires, Rev. Asoc. Geolog. Argentina, 59, 433-442, 2004.
49. Zhou, L. P., F. Oldfield, A. G. Whintle, S. G. Robinson, and J. T. Wang, Partly pedogenic origin of magnetic variations in Chinese loess, Nature, 346, 737-739, 1990.