The influence of polyphony on the dynamical modelling of musical timbre

Pattern Recognition Letters

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 654-661

  Aucouturier, Jean Julien ^a   Pachet, Francois ^b  

^a Graduate School of Arts and Sciences   (Japan)

^b SONY COMPUTER SCIENCE LABORATORY   (France)

Author keywords

Dynamics; Music; Polyphony; Segmentation; Similarity; Timbre

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MARKOV PROCESSES; MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

INSTRUMENT NOTES; POLYPHONY; SEGMENTATION; TIMBRE;

COMPUTER MUSIC;

EID: 33846044298     PISSN: 01678655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2006.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ASA, 1960. Acoustical terminology, s.1.1-1960. American standards association.
2. Aucouturier J.J., and Pachet F. Representing musical genre: A state of the art. J. New Music Res. 32 1 (2003)
3. Aucouturier J.-J., and Pachet F. Improving timbre similarity: How high's the sky?. J. Negative Results Speech Audio Sci. 1 1 (2004)
4. Aucouturier, J.-J., Pachet, F., Hanappe, P., 2004. From sound sampling to song sampling. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), Barcelona, Spain.
5. Aucouturier, J.-J., Aurnhammer, M., Pachet, F., submitted for publication. Sound textures: An investigation of image texture analysis for audio timbre similarity. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.
6. Crochemore M., and Rytter W. Text Algorithms (1994), Oxford University Press
7. Dannenberg R., and Hu N. Pattern discovery techniques for music audio. J. New Music Res. 32 2 (2003) 153-164
8. Daudet L. Sparse and structured decompositions of signals with the molecular matching pursuit. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process 14 5 (2006) 1808-1826
9. Dubnov, S., Fine, S., 1999. Stochastic modeling and recognition of solo instruments using harmonic and multi band noise features. Technical report, HUJI Israel. Available from .
10. Eronen, A., 2003. Musical instrument recognition using ICA-based transform of features and discriminatively trained HMMs. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Signal Processing and its Applications (ISSPA), Paris, France. pp. 133-136.
11. Essid, S., Richard, G., David., B., 2005. Instrument recognition in polyphonic music. In: Proc. Internat. Conf. on Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. (ICASSP), Philadelphia (USA).
12. Flexer, A., Pampalk, E., Widmer, G., 2005. Hidden markov models for spectral similarity of songs In: Proc. 8th Internat. Conf. on Digital Audio Effects (DAFX'05), Madrid, Spain.
13. Furui S. Speaker-independent isolated word recognition using dynamic features of speech spectrum. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 34 1 (1986) 52-59
14. Georgiev P.G., Theis F., and Cichocki A. Sparse component analysis and blind source separation of underdetermined mixtures. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 16 4 (2005) 992-996
15. Gouyon F., and Dixon S. A review of automatic rhythm description systems. Comput. Music J. 29 1 (2005) 34-54
16. Grey J.M. Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 61 (1977) 1270-1277
17. Herrera-Boyer P., Peeters G., and Dubnov S. Automatic classification of musical instrument sounds. J. New Music Res. 32 2 (2003) 3-21
18. Iverson P., and Krumhansl C.L. Isolating the dynamic attributes of musical timbre. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 94 (1993) 2595-2603
19. Jehan, T., 2004. Perceptual segment clustering for music description and time-axis redundancy cancellation. In: Proc. Internat. Symp. on Music Inform. Retrieval (ISMIR). Barcelona, Spain.
20. McAdams S., Winsberg S., Donnadieu S., De Soete G., and Krimphoff J. Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: Common dimensions, specificities, and latent subject classes. Psychol. Res. 58 (1995) 177-192
21. Peeters, G., LaBurthe, A., Rodet, X., 2002. Toward automatic music audio summary generation from signal analysis. In: Proc. 3rd Internat. Conf. on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), Paris (France).
22. Rabiner L. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc. IEEE 77 2 (1989)
23. Rabiner L., and Juang B. Fundamentals of Speech Recognition (1993), Prentice-Hall
24. Scaringella, N., Zoia, G., 2005. On the modelling of time information for automatic genre recognition systems in audio signals. In: Proc. Internat. Symp. on Music Inform. Retrieval, London, UK.
25. Schroeder M.R., Atal B.S., and Hall J.L. Optimizing digital speech coders by exploiting masking properties of the human ear. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 66 6 (1979) 1647-1652
26. Smith L., McNab R., and Witten I. Sequence-based melodic comparison: A dynamic programming approach. Comput. Musicol. 11 (1998) 101-117
27. Tzanetakis G., and Cook P. Musical genre classification of audio signals. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 10 5 (2002)
28. Vinet, H., Herrera, P., Pachet., F., 2002. The Cuidado project. In: Proc. 3rd Internat. Conf. on Music Inform. Retrieval (ISMIR), Paris (France).
29. Voorhes, E., Harman, D., 1999. Overview of the eighth text retrieval conference. In: Proc. 8th Text Retrieval Conf. (TREC), Gaithersburg, MD, USA.