Chiropractic's Current State: Impacts for the Future

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-3

  Mootz, Robert D ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS ETHICS; CHIROPRACTIC; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; RESEARCH PRIORITY; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

CHIROPRACTIC; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; MANIPULATION, CHIROPRACTIC; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33846043125     PISSN: 01614754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.12.018     Document Type: Editorial

References (12)

1. Barnes P., Powell-Griner E., McFann K., and Nahin R. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. Adv Data (2004) 1-19
2. Eisenberg D., Davis R., Ettner S., Appel S., Wilkey S., Van Rompay M., and Kessler R. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA 280 (1998) 1569-1575
3. Tindle H., Davis R., Phillips R., and Eisenberg D. Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults: 1997-2002. Altern Ther Health Med 11 (2005) 42-49
4. Ernst E., and Canter P. A systematic review of systematic reviews of spinal manipulation. J R Soc Med 99 (2006) 192-196
5. Bronfort G., Haas M., Moher D., Bouter L., van Tulder M., Triano J., Assendelft W., Evans R., Dagenais S., and Rosner A. Review conclusions by Ernst and Canter regarding spinal manipulation refuted. Chiropr Osteopat 14 (2006) 14
6. Institute for Alternative Futures: the future of chiropractic revisited: 2005-2015 (2005), Institute for Alternative Futures, Alexandria (VA) 117
7. UK BEAM Trial Team. United Kingdom Back Pain Exercise and Manipulation (UK BEAM) randomized trial. Effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care. BMJ 329 (2004) 1377
8. UK BEAM Trial Team. United Kingdom Back Pain Exercise and Manipulation (UK BEAM) randomized trial. Cost effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care. BMJ 329 7479 (2004) 1381
9. Wickizer T., Franklin G., Mootz R., Fulton-Kehoe D., Plaeger-Brockway R., Drylie D., Turner J., and Smith-Weller T. A communitywide intervention to improve outcomes and reduce disability among injured workers in Washington State. Milbank Q 82 (2004) 547-567
10. Petersen L., Woodard L., Urech T., Daw C., and Sookanan S. Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care?. Ann Intern Med 145 (2006) 265-272
11. Nelson C., Lawrence D., Triano J., Bronfort G., Perle S., Metz R., Hegetschweiler K., and LaBrot T. Chiropractic as spine care: a model for the profession. Chiropr Osteopat 13 (2005) 9
12. Mootz R., Cherkin D., Odegard C., Eisenberg D., Barassi J., and Deyo R. Characteristics of chiropractic practitioners, patients, and encounters in Massachusetts and Arizona. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 28 (2005) 645-653