Is educational inequality protective? [1]

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 97, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 8-9

  Moore, Spencer ^a   Daniel, Mark ^a   Kestens, Yan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFACT; BIVARIATE ANALYSIS; CANADA; EDUCATION; LETTER; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; INFANT, LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; INFANT, NEWBORN; NEW YORK CITY; QUEBEC; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 33846035845     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.101618     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Galea S, Ahern J. Distribution of education and population health: an ecological analysis of New York City neighborhoods. Am J Public Health. 2005;95: 2198-2205.
2. Weinberg C. Toward a clearer definition of confounding. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:1-8.
3. Greenland S, Morgenstern H. Ecological bias, confounding, and effect modification. Int J Epidemiol. 1989;18:269-274.