Three cements used for orthodontic banding of porcelain molars

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 94-99

  Herion, Tracy ^a   Ferracane, Jack L ^b   Covell, David A ^b  

^a Willamette Dental Group   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ball mill; Bands; Compomer; Glass ionomer; Porcelain; Resin modified glass ionomer

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846034001     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/100505-350R.1     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Norris DS, McInnes-Ledoux P, Schwaninger B, Weinberg R. Retention of orthodontic bands with new fluoride-releasing cements. Am J Orthod. 1986;89:206-211.
2. Durning P, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. A laboratory investigation into cements used to retain orthodontic bands. Br J Orthod. 1994;21:27-32.
3. Millett DT, McCabe JF, Bennett TG, Carter NE, Gordon PH. The effect of sandblasting on the retention of first molar orthodontic bands cemented with glass ionomer cement. Br J Orthod. 1995;22:161-169.
4. Millett DT, Kamahli K, McColl J. Comparative laboratory investigation of dual-cured vs. conventional glass ionomer cements for band cementation. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:345-350.
5. Aggarwal M, Foley TF, Rix D. A comparison of shear-peel band strengths of 5 orthodontic cements. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:308-316.
6. Millett DT, Duff S, Morrison L, Cummings A, Gilmour WH. In vitro comparison of orthodontic band cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:15-20.
7. Millett DT, Cummings A, Letters S, Roger E, Love J. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?-an in vitro evaluation. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:609-614.
8. Saito S, Tosaki S, Hirota K. Characteristics of glass-ionomer cements. In: Davidson CL, Mjor IA, eds. Advances in Glass-Ionomer Cements. Carol Stream, Ill: Quintessence; 1999:15-50.
9. McComb D. Luting in orthodontic practice. In: Davidson CL, Mjor IA, eds. Advances in Glass-Ionomer Cements. Carol Stream, Ill: Quintessence; 1999:171-182.
10. O'Brien WJ, ed. Dental Materials and Their Selection. 3rd ed. Carol Stream, Ill: Quintessence; 2002.
11. Eliades G. Chemical and biological properties of glass-ionomer cements. In: Davidson CL, Mjor IA, eds. Advances in Glass-Ionomer Cements. Carol Stream, Ill: Quintessence; 1999:85-101.
12. Johnson N. Current products and practice - orthodontic banding cements. J Orthod. 2000;27:283-284.
13. Craig RG, Powers JM, Wataha JC. Dental Materials Properties and Manipulation. 8th ed. St Louis, Mo: CV Mosby Co; 2004.
14. Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333-340.
15. Abu Kasim NH, Millett DT, McCabe JF. The ball mill as a means of investigating the mechanical failure of dental materials. J Dent. 1996;24:117-124.
16. Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Time-dependent strength and fatigue resistance of dental direct restorative materials. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2003;14:1047-1053.