Pseudo-polar drive patterns for brain electrical impedance tomography

Physiological Measurement

Volumn 27, Issue 11, 2006, Pages

  Shi, Xuetao ^a   Dong, Xiuzhen ^a   Shuai, Wanjun ^a   You, Fusheng ^a   Fu, Feng ^a   Liu, Ruigang ^a  

^a FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Drive pattern; Electrical impedance tomography; Resistivity distribution

Indexed keywords

CEREBROSPINAL FLUID; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENT; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY;

BRAIN TISSUE; CROSS POLARS; DRIVE PATTERNS; DYNAMIC RANGE; ELECTRICAL IMPE DANCE TOMOGRAPHY (EIT); HIGH RESISTANCE; LOW RESISTANCE; PERFORMANCE; RESISTIVITY DISTRIBUTIONS; SINGLE SOURCE;

ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE;

ARTICLE; BRAIN ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; BRAIN TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NOISE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

BRAIN; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33846033598     PISSN: 09673334     EISSN: 13616579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/27/11/002     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. AAMI 1993 American National Standard, Safe Current Limits for Electromedical Apparatus (Arlington, VA: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation) (ANSI/AAMI ES1-1993)
2. Avis N J and Barber D C 1992 Adjacent or polar drive?: image reconstruction implications in electrical impedance tomography systems employing filtered back projection Proc. Ann. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 14 1689-90
3. Avis N J 1993 Image reconstruction for electrical impedance tomography PhD Thesis University of Sheffield
4. Avis N J and Barber D C 1994 Image reconstruction using non-adjacent drive configurations Physiol. Meas. 15 A153-60
5. Baumann S B, Wozny D R, Kelly S K and Meno F M 1997 The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44 220-3
6. Bayford R H, Boone K G, Hanquan Y and Holder D S 1996 Improvement of the positional accuracy of EIT images of the head using a Lagrange multiplier reconstruction algorithm with diametric excitation Physiol. Meas. 17 A49-A57
7. Cheney M, Isaacson D, Newell J C, Simske S and Goble J 1990 NOSER-an algorithm for solving the inverse conductivity problem Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 2 66-75
8. Cheney M and Isaacson D 1992 Distinguishability in impedance imaging IEEE Transn. Biomed. Imaging 39 852-60
9. Demidenko E, Hartov A, Soni N and Paulsen K D 2005 On optimal current patterns for electrical impedance tomography IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 52 238-48
10. Eyöboǧlu B M and Pilkington T C 1993 Comment on distinguishability in electrical- impedance imaging IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 40 1328-30
11. Gisser D G, Isaacson D and Newel J C 1987 Current topics in impedance imaging Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. A 8 39-46
12. Gisser D G, Isaacson D and Newell J C 1988 Theory and performance of an adaptive current tomography system Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 9 35-41
13. Isaacson D 1986 Distinguishability of conductivities by electric current computed tomography IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 5 91-5
14. Lattikka J, Kuurne T and Eskola H 2001 Conductivity of living intracranial tissues Phys. Med. Biol. 46 1611-6
15. Lionheart W B, Kaipio J and McLeod C N 2000 Generalized optimal current patterns and electrical safety in EIT Preprint physics/0003094 3 1-6
16. Oostendorp T, Delbeke J and Stegeman D 2000 The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47 1487-92
17. Schuessler T F and Bates J T 1998 Current patterns and electrode types for single source electrical impedance tomography of the thorax Ann. Biomed. Eng. 26 253-9
18. Yamamoto T and Yamamoto Y 1976 Electrical properties of the epidermal stratum corneum Med. Biol. Eng. 14 151-8