Native Mediterranean Pyrus rootstock, P. amygdaliformis and P. elaeagrifolia, present higher tolerance to salinity stress compared with Asian natives

Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

Volumn 75, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 450-457

  Matsumoto, Kazuhiro ^a   Tamura, Fumio ^a   Chun, Jong Pil ^b   Tanabe, Kenji ^a  

^a TOTTORI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Chungnam National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Ion uptake; Photosynthesis; Pyrus betulaefolia; Salt tolerance

Indexed keywords

CITRUS MAXIMA; PYRUS; PYRUS AMYGDALIFORMIS; PYRUS BETULAEFOLIA; PYRUS COMMUNIS; PYRUS ELAEAGRIFOLIA; PYRUS PYRIFOLIA; PYRUS PYRIFOLIA VAR. CULTA;

EID: 33846033197     PISSN: 18823351     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2503/jjshs.75.450     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bell, R. L. 1991. Pears (Pyrus). Genetic resources of temperate fruit and nut crops 2. Acta Hort. 290: 657-697.
2. Bernstein, L. 1965. Salt tolerance of fruit crops. USDA Info. Bul. 292.
3. Bernstein, N., M. Ioffe and M. Zilberstaine. 2001. Salt-stress effects on avocado rootstock growth. I. Establishing criteria for determination of shoot growth sensitivity to the stress. Plant Soil 233: 1-11.
4. Bernstein, N. and U. Kafkafi. 2002. Root growth under salinity stress. p. 787-805. In: Y. Waisel, A. Eshel and U. Kafkafi (eds.). Plant roots. Hidden half. 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York.
5. Boland, A. M., P. Jerie and E. Maas. 1997. Long-term effects of salinity on fruit trees. Acta Hort. 449: 599-606.
6. Fisarakis, I., K. Chartzoulakis and D. Stavrakas. 2001. Response of Sultana vines (V. vinifera L.) on six rootstocks to NaCl salinity exposure and recovery. Agr. Water Manage. 51: 13-27.
7. 2 assimilation rate in lemon varieties on different rootstocks. Physiol. Plant. 89: 427-432.
8. Greenway, H. and R. Munns. 1980. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31: 149-190.
9. Holbrook, N. M., V. R. Shashidhar, R. A. James and R. Munns. 2002. Stomatal control in tomato with ABA-deficient roots: response of grafted plant to soil drying. J. Exp. Bot. 53: 1503-1514.
10. Iwasaki, I., S. Utsumi, K. Hagino and T. Ozawa. 1956. A spectrophotometric method for the determination of small amount of chloride using mercuric thiocyanate. J. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 29: 860-864.
11. 2 assimilation, leaf injury and growth in salt-stressed durum wheat. Funct. Plant Biol. 29: 1393-1403.
12. Kajiura, I. 2002. Studies on the recent advances and future trends of Asian pear in Japan. Acta Hort. 587: 113-124.
13. Lombard, P. B. and M. N. Westwood. 1987. Pear rootstocks. p. 145-183. In: R. C. Rom and R. F. Carlson (eds.). Rootstocks for fruit crops. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
14. Massai, R., D. Remorini and M. Tattini. 2004. Gas exchange, water relations and osmotic adjustment in two scion/ rootstock combinations of Prunus under various salinity concentrations. Plant Soil 259: 153-162.
15. Matsumoto, K., J. P. Chun, F. Tamura, Y. Kamamoto and K. Tanabe. 2006. Salt tolerance in Pyrus species is linked to levels of Na and Cl translocation from roots to leaves. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 75: 385-391.
16. McCutchan, H. and K. A. Shackel. 1992. Leaf-water potential as a sensitive indicator of water stress in Prune trees (Prunus domestica L. cv. French). J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 117: 607-611.
17. Mickelbart, M. V. and M. L. Arpaia. 2002. Rootstock influences changes in ion concentrations, growth, and photosynthesis of 'Hass' avocado trees in response to salinity. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 127: 649-655.
18. Motosugi, H., A. Sugiura and T. Tomana. 1987. Salt tolerance of various apple rootstock cultivars. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 56: 135-141 (In Japanese with English summary).
19. Munns, R. 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 25: 239-250.
20. 2 Kjeldahl digestion method. Bull. Fac. Agr. Niigata Univ. 43: 111-120. (In Japanese with English summary).
21. Ouerghi, Z., G. Cornic, M. Roudani, A. Ayadi and J. Brulfert. 2000. Effect of NaCl on photosynthesis of two wheat species (Triticum durum and T. aestivum) differing in their sensitivity to salt stress. J. Plant Physiol. 156: 335-340.
22. Procopiou, J. and A. Wallace. 2000. A wild pear native to calcareous soils that has a possible as a pear rootstock. J. Plant Nutr. 23: 1969-1972.
23. Rathore, D. S. 1991. Pears. p. 123-178. In: S. K. Mitra, T. K. Bose and D. S. Rathore (eds.). Temperate fruit. Horticulture and Allied Publishers, India.
24. Ruiz, D., V. Martinez and A. Ceroa. 1997. Citrus response to salinity: growth and nutrient uptake. Tree Physiol. 17: 141-150.
25. Storey, R. and R. R. Walker. 1999. Citrus and salinity. Sci. Hort. 78: 39-81.
26. Tardieu, F., T. Lafarge and T. Simonneau. 1996. Stomatal control by fed or endogenous xylem ABA in sunflower: Interpretation of correlations between leaf water potential and stomatal conductance in anisohydric species. Plant Cell Environ. 19: 75-84.
27. Ziska, L. H., J. R. Seemann and T. M. DeJong. 1990. Salinity induced limitation on photosynthesis in Prunus salicina, a deciduous tree species. Plant Physiol. 93: 864-870.