Tracking new directions in the evaluation of postgraduate supervision

Innovative Higher Education

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 127-147

  Aspland, Tania ^a   Edwards, Helen ^a   O'Leary, Jane ^b   Ryan, Yoni ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b Affirmative Action Agency   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846026060     PISSN: 07425627     EISSN: 15731758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:IHIE.0000008150.75564.b3     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aspland, T., & O'Donoghue, T. (1994). Quality in supervising overseas students? In O. Zuber-Skerritt & Y. Ryan (Eds.), Quality in postgraduate education (pp. 59-76). London: Kogan Page.
2. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of the disciplines. Milton Keynes: SRHE and Open University Press.
3. Bernard, J.M., & Goodyear, R.K. (1992). Fundamentals of clinical supervision. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
4. Cesa, I.L., & Fraser, S.C. (1989). A method for encouraging the development of good mentor-protege relationships. Teaching of psychology, 16 (3), 125-128.
5. Commonwealth Tertiary Education Commission (1986). Review of efficiency and effectiveness in higher education. Report of the Committee of Enquiry. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
6. Cullen, D.J., Pearson, M., Saha, L.J., & Spear, R.H. (1994). Establishing effective Ph.D. supervision. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
7. Descy, D.E. (1991). Media educators and the development of an instrument to measure attitude towards advisors: The Descy attitude towards advisors scale. International Journal of Instructional Media, 18, 55-61.
8. Department of Employment, Education and Training (1996). Diversity in Australian higher education institutions, 1994. DEET Report No. 26. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
9. Edwards H., Aspland, T., Litster, D., O'Leary, J., Ryan, Y., Southey, G., & Timms, P. (1996). The development of a process for student evaluation of postgraduate supervision (Final Report to Teaching & Learning Committee). Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.
10. Edwards H., Aspland, T., O'Leary, J., Ryan, Y., Southey, G., & Timms, P. (1995). Tracking postgraduate supervison. Brisbane: Academic Staff Development Unit, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
11. Elphinstone, L. (1994). Manual for supervisors of postgraduate students. Melbourne: Educational Quality Assurance, Research and Development, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology.
12. Grant, B., & Graham, A. (1994). Guidelines for discussion: A tool for managing postgraduate supervision. In O. Zuber-Skerritt & Y. Ryan (Eds.), Quality in postgraduate education (pp. 165-174). London: Kogan Page.
13. Gruetzemacher, R.R., & Morris, R.J. (1992). A factor analytic study of graduate education students' ratings of research methods instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Education Research Association. Knoxville, TN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 353 326)
14. Hill, W.C. (1981). Student perceptions of advanced studies: A research to date summary. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 232 505).
15. Hockey, J. (1991). The Social Science PhD: A literature review. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 319-332.
16. Ibrahim, E.Z., McEwan, E.M., & Pitblado, R. (1980). Doctoral supervision at Sydney University: Hindrance or help? Vestes, 23(1), 18-22.
17. Moses, I. (1985). Supervising postgraduates. Kensington: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia [HERDSA]. HERDSA Green Guide No 3
18. Moses, I. (1984). Supervision of higher degree students: Problem areas and possible solutions. Higher Education Research and Development, 3, 153-165.
19. Mullins, G., & Hejka, E. (1994). The evaluation of postgraduate supervision. Proceedings of the HERDSA Conference. Canberra: HERDSA.
20. Parry, S., & Hayden, M. (1994). Supervising higher degrees research students. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
21. Phillips, E. (1994). Avoiding communication breakdowns. In O. Zuber-Skerritt & Y. Ryan (Eds.), Quality in postgraduate education (pp. 134-142). London: Kogan Page.
22. Phillips, E., & Pugh, D. (1994). How to get a Ph.D.: A handbook for students and supervisors (2nd ed). Buckingham: Open University Press.
23. Powles, M. (1988). Know your Ph.D. students and how to help them. Melbourne:Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne.
24. Ryan, Y. (1994). Contracts and checklists: Practical propositions for postgraduate supervision. In O. Zuber-Skerritt & Y. Ryan (Eds.), Quality in postgraduate education (pp. 156-164). London: Kogan Page.
25. Ryan, Y., & Whittle, J. (1997). Adapted the original Moses schema at a Workshop in the Third Conference on Postgraduate Supervision, Gold Coast, Australia.
26. Williams, B.A., Van Nort, J.J., & Titus, T.G. (1993). Factors that measure supervision effectiveness: A comparison of the SQ and SQ-R. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association. Atlanta, GA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 363 830)
27. Zuber-Skerritt, O. (Ed.) (1992). Starting research - supervision and training. Brisbane: Tertiary Education Institute, University of Queensland.