Toxicant exposure in cigarette reducers versus light smokers

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

Volumn 15, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2355-2358

  Hatsukami, Dorothy K ^a   Le, Chap T ^a   Zhang, Ying ^a   Joseph, Anne M ^a   Mooney, Marc E ^a   Carmella, Steven G ^a   Hecht, Stephen S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

4 (METHYLNITROSAMINO) 1 (3 PYRIDYL) 1 BUTANOL; 4 (METHYLNITROSAMINO) 1 (3 PYRIDYL) 1 BUTANONE; GLUCURONIDE; TOBACCO SMOKE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CIGARETTE SMOKING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NICOTINE REPLACEMENT THERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SMOKING CESSATION; SMOKING HABIT; URINE LEVEL;

ADMINISTRATION, CUTANEOUS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CHEWING GUM; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NICOTINE; NITROSAMINES; PYRIDINES; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION;

EID: 33846018015     PISSN: 10559965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0240     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. McMorrow MJ, Foxx RM. Nicotine's role in smoking: an analysis of nicotine regulation. Psychol Bull 1983;93:302-27.
2. National Cancer Institute. Risks associated with smoking cigarettes with low machine-measured yields of tar and nicotine. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No 13. Bethesda (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2001.
3. Scherer G. Smoking behaviour and compensation: a review of the literature. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1999;145:1-20.
4. Stephen AM, Frost C, Thompson S, Wald NJ. Estimating extent of compensatory smoking. In: Wald NJ, Froggatt P, editors. Nicotine, smoking, and the low tar programme. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989.
5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking: nicotine addiction. A report of the Surgeon General. Rockville (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1988.
6. Hatsukami DK, Slade J, Benowitz NL, et al. Reducing tobacco harm: research challenges and issues. Nicotine Tob Res 2002;4 Suppl 2:S89-101.
7. Hecht SS, Murphy SE, Carmella SG, et al. Effects of reduced cigarette smoking on the uptake of a tobacco-specific lung carcinogen. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:107-15.
8. Godtfredsen NS, Prescott E, Osler M. Effect of smoking reduction on lung cancer risk. JAMA 2005;294:1505-10.
9. Fant RV, Schuh KJ, Stitzer ML. Response to smoking as a function of prior smoking amounts. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1995;119:385-90.
10. Perez-Stable EJ, Herrera B, Jacob P III, Benowitz NL. Nicotine metabolism and intake in black and white smokers. JAMA 1998;280:152-6.
11. Harris JE. Incomplete compensation does not imply reduced harm: yields of 40 smoke toxicants per milligram nicotine in regular filter versus low-tar cigarettes in the 1999 Massachusetts Benchmark Study. Nicotine Tob Res 2004;6:797-807.
12. Godtfredsen NS, Vestbo J, Osler M, Prescott E. Risk of hospital admission for COPD following smoking cessation and reduction: a Danish population study. Thorax 2002;57:967-72.
13. Godtfredsen NS, Osler M, Vestbo J, Andersen I, Prescott E. Smoking reduction, smoking cessation, and incidence of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction in Denmark 1976-1998: a pooled cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003;57:412-6.
14. Bjartveit K, Tverdal A. Health consequences of smoking 1-4 cigarettes per day. Tob Control 2005;14:315-20.
15. Godtfredsen NS, Holst C, Prescott E, Vestbo J, Osler M. Smoking reduction, smoking cessation, and mortality: a 16-year follow-up of 19,732 men and women from The Copenhagen Centre for Prospective Population Studies. Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:994-1001.
16. Joseph AM, Hecht SS, Murphy SE, et al. Relationships between cigarette consumption and biomarkers of tobacco toxin exposure. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:2963-8.
17. Perkins KA. Individual variability in responses to nicotine. Behav Genet 1995;25:119-32.
18. Perkins KA. Sex differences in nicotine versus nonnicotine reinforcement as determinants of tobacco smoking. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 1996;4:166-77.
19. Woodward M, Tunstall-Pedoe H. Self-titration of nicotine: evidence from the Scottish Heart Health Study. Addiction 1993;88:821-30.
20. Hatsukami D, Skoog K, Allen S, Bliss R. Gender and the effects of different doses of nicotine gum on tobacco withdrawal symptoms. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 1995;3:163-73.
21. Hecht SS, Murphy SE, Carmella SG, et al. Similar uptake of lung carcinogens by smokers of regular, light, and ultralight cigarettes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:693-8.
22. Hecht SS. Carcinogen derived biomarkers: applications in studies of human exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke. Tob Control 2004;13:i48-56.