Laminar and turbulent comparisons for channel flow and flow control

Journal of Fluid Mechanics

Volumn 570, Issue , 2007, Pages 467-477

  Marusic, Ivan ^a   Joseph, D D ^a   Mahesh, Krishnan ^a  

^a University of Minnesota   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; DRAG; FLOW CONTROL; FRICTION; LAMINAR FLOW; PRESSURE DROP; REYNOLDS NUMBER; TURBULENT FLOW;

CROSSFLOW APPROACH; LAMINAR-POISEUILLE-FLOW; VOLUME FLUX;

CHANNEL FLOW;

CHANNEL FLOW; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; DRAG; FLOW CONTROL; FRICTION; LAMINAR FLOW; PRESSURE DROP; REYNOLDS NUMBER; TURBULENT FLOW;

CHANNEL FLOW; DRAG; FLOW CONTROL; LAMINAR FLOW; PRESSURE GRADIENT; REYNOLDS NUMBER; TURBULENT FLOW;

EID: 33846006934     PISSN: 00221120     EISSN: 14697645     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022112006003247     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. del Álamo, J. C. & Jiménez, J. 2003 Spectra of the very large anisotropic scales in turbulent channels. Phys. Fluids 15(6), L41-L44.
2. del Álamo, J. C., Jiménez, J., Zandonade, P. & Moser, R. D. 2004 Scaling of the energy spectra of turbulent channels. J. Fluid Mech. 500, 135-144.
3. Barenblatt, G. I. 2005 Applied mechanics: An age old science perpetually in rebirth. ASME Timoshenko Medal Acceptance Speech.
4. Barenblatt, G. I., Chorin, A. J. & Prostokishin, V. M. 2005 A note concerning the Lighthill 'sandwich model' of tropical cyclones. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 102, 11148-11150.
5. Bewley, T. R. 2001 Flow control: New challenges for a new renaissance. Prog. Aerospace Sci. 37, 21.
6. Bewley, T. R. & Aamo, O. M. 2004 A 'win-win' mechanism for low-drag transients in controlled two-dimensional channel flow and its implications for sustained drag reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 499, 183-196.
7. Busse, F. H. 1970 Bounds for turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 219-240.
8. Choi, H., Moin, P. & Kim, J. 1994 Active turbulence control for drag reduction in wall-bounded flows. J. Fluid Mech. 262, 75-110.
9. Cortelezzi, L., Lee, K. H., Kim, J. & Speyer, J. L. 1998 Skin-friction drag reduction via robust reduced-order linear feedback control. Intl J. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 11, 79-92.
10. Dean, R. B. 1978 Reynolds number dependence of skin friction and other bulk flow variables in two-dimensional rectangular duct flow. Trans. ASME: J. Fluids Engng 100, 215-223.
11. van Doorne, C. W. H. 2004 Stereoscopic PIV on transition in pipe flow. PhD thesis, TU-Delft, Netherlands.
12. Fukagata, K., Iwamoto, K. & Kasagi, N. 2002 Contribution of Reynolds stress distribution to the skin friction in wall-bounded flows. Phys. Fluids 14(11), L73-L76.
13. Gore, R. & Crowe, C. 1989 Effect of particle size on modulating turbulent intensity. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 15, 279-285.
14. Howard, L. N. 1972 Bounds on flow quantities. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 4, 473-494.
15. τ = 2003. Phys. Fluids 18, 011702.
16. Iwamoto, K., Fukagata, K., Kasagi, N. & Suzuki, Y. 2005 Friction drag reduction achievable by near-wall turbulence manipulation at high Reynolds number. Phys. Fluids 17, 011702.
17. Joseph, D. D. 1974 Response curves for plane Poiseuille flow. Adv. Appli. Mech. 14, 241-278.
18. McKeon, B., Li, J., Jiang, W., Morrison, J. & Smits, A. 2004 Further observations on the mean velocity in fully-developed pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 501, 135-147.
19. McKeon, B., Zagarola, M. & Smits, A. 2005 A new friction factor relationship for fully developed pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 538, 429-443.
20. Min, T., Kang, S., Speyer, J. L. & Kim, J. 2006 Sustained sub-laminar drag in a fully developed channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 558, 309-318.
21. Muppidi, S. & Mahesh, K. 2005 Study of trajectories of jets in crossflow using direct numerical simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 530, 81-100.
22. Perry, A. E., Marusic, I. & Jones, M. B. 2002 On the streamwise evolution of turbulent boundary layers in arbitrary pressure gradients. J. Fluid Mech. 461, 61-91.
23. Thomas, T. Y. 1942 Qualitative analysis of the flow of fluids in pipes. Am. J. Maths 64, 754-767.