Discussion across borders: Benefits for collaborative learning;Discussion par delÀ les frontières: Les bénéfices de l’apprentissage coopératif;Besprechungen über grenzen hinweg: Hilfen für gemeinschaftliches Lernen

Educational Media International

Volumn 40, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 139-152

  Whatley, Janice ^a   Bell, Frances ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846003946     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0952398032000092189     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. [Line 6323]Avison, D, Baskerville, R and Myers, M (2001) Controlling action research projects, Information Technology & People. 14, 1, 28-45.
2. [Line 6354]Baskerville, R (1999) Investigating information systems with action research, Communications of the AIS, 2, 19.
3. [Line 6380]Boddy, D and Tickner, S (1999) Barriers to electronic networking: technology, student needs or social context? Active Learning, 10, July, 39-43.
4. [Line 6410]Brown, JS, Collins, A and Duguid, S (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning, Educational Researeher, 18, 1, 32-42.
5. Checkland, P and Holwell, S (1998) Information, Systems and Information Systems: making sense of the field, Wiley, Chichester.
6. Clegg, S and Steel, J (2002) Flexibility as Myth? New Technologies and Post-Fordism in Higher Education. Paper presented at the Third International Conference in Networked Learning, Sheffield.
7. Cowan, J (1998) On becoming an innovative university teacher. Open University Press, Buckingham.
8. [Line 6508]Desanctis, G, Snyder, JR and Poole, MS (1994) The meaning of the interface a functional and holistic evaluation of a meeting software system. Decision Support Systems, 11, 4, 319-335.
9. Goodyear, P (2001) Effective networked learning in higher education: notes and guidelines, Centre for Studies in Advanced Learning Technology, Lancaster University.
10. Goodyear, P and Stone, C (1992) Domain knowledge, rpistemology and intelligent tutoring in social science. In Moyse, R and Elsom-Cook, M (eds; Knowledge Negotiation. Academic Press, London, pp. 69-96.
11. [Line 6593]Hara, N and Kling, R (1999) Students' frustration with a web-base distance education course, First Monday, 4, 12.
12. [Line 6620]Hung, DWL and Chen, D-T (2001) Situated cognition, Vygotskian thought and learning from the communities of practice perspective: implications for the design of web-based e-learning. Education Media International, 38, 1, 3-12.
13. Kolb, DA (1984) Experiential Learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
14. [Line 6671]Leadbeater. C (2000) The future of learning. Guardian Unlimited, 14 February. Available online: http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archivc/Article/0,4273,3957626,00.html (accessed 1 May 2002).
15. [Line 6695]Manheim, ML and Watson-Manheim, MB (1999) Managing virtual work: integrating reflection and action through appropriate software support, Electronic Journal of Organizational Virtualness, 1, 1, 19 42.
16. [Line 6725]Maule, RW (1997) Adult IT programs: a discourse on pedagogy strategy and the Internet, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 7, 2, 129-152.
17. [Line 6754]McKay, J and Marshall, P (2001; The dual imperatives of action research, Information Technology & People, 14, 1, 46-59.
18. Morgan, C and O'Reilly, M (1999) Assessing Open and Distance Learners, Kogan Page, London.
19. [Line 6806]Mumford. E (2001) Advice for an action researcher, Information Technology & People, 14, 1, 12-27.
20. [Line 6835]Myers, J (1992) Cooperative Learning, a personal journey. Journal of Education, 174, 2, 118.
21. NGfL (2002) National Grind for Learning, UK government portal. Available online:http://www.ngfl.gov.uk/index.jsp (accessed 1 May 2002).
22. Nightingale, P and O'Neil, M (1997) Achieving Quality Learning in Higher Education, Kogan Page, London.
23. Panitz, T (1996) A Definition of Collaborative vs Cooperative Learning, DeLiberations. Available online: http://www.lgu.ac.uk/deliberations/collab.learning/panitz2.html (accessed 15 September 2000).
24. Salmon, G (2000) E-Moderating, Kogan-Page, London.
25. Schon, D (1983) The Reflective Practitioner How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York.
26. Slavin, R (1990) Cooperative Learning: theory, research and practice, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. NJ.
27. [Line 6987]Susman, G and Evered, R (1978) An assessment of the scientific merits of action research, Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 4, 582-603.
28. Tiwari, A and Holtham, C (1998) Learning Groupware through using groupware computer supported collaborative learning with face-to-face students. Paper presented at the ITiCSE, Dublin, Ireland.
29. [Line 7042]Watson-Manheim, MB, Chudoba, KM and Crowston, K (2002) Discontinuities and continuities: a new way to understand virtual work. Information Technology & People, 15, 3, 191-209.
30. Whatley, J and Bell, F (2002) The Effect Upon Learning of Collaboration on Teamwork Projects Across Borders. Paper presented at the EUNIS2002: The Eighth Conference of European University Information Systems, Porto, Portugal.
31. Whatley, J, Bell, F and Thissen, F (2001) The effect upon learning of collaboration on teamwork projects across borders. Paper presented at the ALT-C 2001: Changing Learning Environments, University of Edinburgh.