Electrode independence in intraneural cochlear nerve stimulation

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 16-24

  Badi, Arunkumar N ^a,b   Owa, Anthony O ^c,d   Shelton, Clough ^c   Normann, Richard A ^a,e  

^a Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

^b MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d ROYAL NATIONAL THROAT NOSE AND EAR HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e BPRB   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory nerve; Auditory neuroprosthesis; Channel independence; Cochlear implants; Microelectrodes

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CAT; COCHLEAR NERVE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; MASKING; MECHANICAL PROBE; NERVE CONDUCTION; NERVE STIMULATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; CATS; COCHLEAR NERVE; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; NERVE FIBERS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; RECRUITMENT DETECTION, AUDIOLOGIC; REFRACTORY PERIOD, ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33846001359     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000244368.70190.38     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Badi AN, Hillman T, Shelton C, et al. A technique for implantation of a 3-dimensional penetrating electrode array in the modiolar nerve of cats and humans. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:1019-25.
2. Badi AN, Kertesz T, Gurgel R, et al. Development of a novel VIII nerve intraneural auditory neuroprosthesis. Laryngoscope 2003;113:833-42.
3. Jones KE, Campbell PK, Normann RA. A glass/silicon composite intracortical electrode array. Ann Biomed Eng 1992;20:423-37.
4. Campbell PK, Jones KE, Huber RJ, et al. A silicon-based, three-dimensional neural interface: Manufacturing processes for an intracortical electrode array. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1991;38:758-68.
5. Campbell PK, Normann RA, Horch KW, et al. A chronic intracortical electrode array: Preliminary results. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:245-59.
6. Normann RA, Maynard EM, Rousche PJ, et al. A neural interface for a cortical vision prosthesis. Vision Res 1999;39:2577-87.
7. Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Robinson BK. Response properties of the refractory cochlear nerve fiber. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2001;2:216-32.
8. Abbas PJ, Brown CJ. Electrically evoked brainstem potentials in cochlear implant patients with multi-electrode stimulation. Hear Res 1988;36:153-62.
9. Rousche PJ, Normann RA. A method for pneumatically inserting an array of penetrating electrodes into cortical tissue. Ann Biomed Eng 1992;20:413-22.
10. Matsuoka AJ, Rubinstein JT, Abbas PJ, et al. The effects of interpulse interval on stochastic properties of electrical stimulation: Models and measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2001;48:416-24.
11. Matsuoka AJ, Abbas PJ, Rubinstein JT, et al. The neuronal response to electrical constant-amplitude pulse train stimulation: Additive Gaussian noise. Hear Res 2000;149:129-37.
12. Lutkenhoner B, Hoke M, Bappert E. Influence of refractory properties on the response of single cochlear nerve fibres to sinusoidal stimuli. Hear Res 1980;2:565-72.
13. Parkins CW. Temporal response patterns of cochlear nerve fibers to electrical stimulation in deafened squirrel monkeys. Hear Res 1989;41:137-68.
14. Beitel RE, Snyder RL, Schreiner CE, et al. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: Comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds. J Neurophysiol 2000;83:2145-62.
15. Stypulkowski PH, van den Honert C. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated cochlear nerve. I. Compound action potential recordings. Hear Res 1984;14:205-23.
16. van den Honert C, Stypulkowski PH. Characterization of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) in cats and humans. Hear Res 1986;21:109-26.
17. van den Honert C, Stypulkowski PH. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated cochlear nerve. II. Single fiber recordings. Hear Res 1984;14:225-43.
18. Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Brown PJ. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response to stimulation of different sites in the cochlea. Hear Res 1993;66:130-42.
19. Achor LJ, Starr A. Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. I. Intracranial and extracranial recordings. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980;48:154-73.
20. Achor LJ, Starr A. Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. II. Effects of lesions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980;48:174-90.
21. Mino H, Rubinstein JT, Miller CA, et al. Effects of electrode-to-fiber distance on temporal neural response with electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004;51:13-20.
22. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: parametric data from the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;88:2205-10.
23. Shannon RV. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the cochlear nerve in man. II. Channel interaction. Hear Res 1983;12:1-16.
24. Chatterjee M, Shannon RV. Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;103:2565-72.
25. Arnesen AR, Osen KK. The cochlear nerve in the cat: Topography, cochleotopy, and fiber spectrum. J Comp Neurol 1978;178:661-78.
26. Sando I. The anatomical interrelationships of the cochlear nerve fibers. Acta Otolaryngol 1965;59:417-36.
27. Popper AN, Fay RR. The Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neurophysiology. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1992.
28. Clopton BM, Spelman FA, Miller JM. Estimates of essential neural elements for stimulation through a cochlear prosthesis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1980;89:S5-7.
29. Pfingst BE. Comparisons of psychophysical and neurophysiological studies of cochlear implants. Hear Res 1988;34:243-51.
30. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Fryauf-Bertschy H, et al. Intraoperative and postoperative electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses in nucleus cochlear implant users: implications for the fitting process. Ear Hear 1994;15:168-76.
31. Brown CJ, Hughes ML, Lopez SM, et al. Relationship between EABR thresholds and levels used to program the CLARION speech processor. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;177:S50-7.
32. Branner A, Stein RB, Normann RA. Selective stimulation using a slanted microelectrode array. J Neurophysiol 2001;85:1585-94.
33. Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Nourski KV, et al. Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties. Hear Res 2003;175:200-14.